Peer Review, Research
"Peer Review, Research" is a descriptor in the National Library of Medicine's controlled vocabulary thesaurus,
MeSH (Medical Subject Headings). Descriptors are arranged in a hierarchical structure,
which enables searching at various levels of specificity.
The evaluation by experts of the quality and pertinence of research or research proposals of other experts in the same field. Peer review is used by editors in deciding which submissions warrant publication, by granting agencies to determine which proposals should be funded, and by academic institutions in tenure decisions.
Descriptor ID |
D017712
|
MeSH Number(s) |
F01.829.316.549.700 H01.770.644.487 I01.880.604.640.700 L01.143.865.750 L01.737.640 N03.706.700.700
|
Concept/Terms |
Peer Review, Research- Peer Review, Research
- Peer Reviews, Research
- Research Peer Review
- Research Peer Reviews
- Review, Research Peer
- Reviews, Research Peer
Peer Review, Grants- Peer Review, Grants
- Grants Peer Review
- Grants Peer Reviews
- Peer Reviews, Grants
- Review, Grants Peer
- Reviews, Grants Peer
- Grants, Peer Review
- Grant, Peer Review
- Peer Review Grant
- Peer Review Grants
- Review Grant, Peer
- Review Grants, Peer
Peer Review, Publishing- Peer Review, Publishing
- Peer Reviews, Publishing
- Publishing Peer Review
- Publishing Peer Reviews
- Review, Publishing Peer
- Reviews, Publishing Peer
|
Below are MeSH descriptors whose meaning is more general than "Peer Review, Research".
- Psychiatry and Psychology [F]
- Behavior and Behavior Mechanisms [F01]
- Psychology, Social [F01.829]
- Group Processes [F01.829.316]
- Peer Review [F01.829.316.549]
- Peer Review, Research [F01.829.316.549.700]
- Natural Sciences [H]
- Natural Science Disciplines [H01]
- Science [H01.770]
- Research [H01.770.644]
- Peer Review, Research [H01.770.644.487]
- Anthropology, Education, Sociology and Social Phenomena [I]
- Social Sciences [I01]
- Sociology [I01.880]
- Social Control, Formal [I01.880.604]
- Peer Review [I01.880.604.640]
- Peer Review, Research [I01.880.604.640.700]
- Information Science [L]
- Information Science [L01]
- Communication [L01.143]
- Scholarly Communication [L01.143.865]
- Peer Review, Research [L01.143.865.750]
- Publishing [L01.737]
- Peer Review, Research [L01.737.640]
- Health Care [N]
- Health Care Economics and Organizations [N03]
- Social Control, Formal [N03.706]
- Peer Review [N03.706.700]
- Peer Review, Research [N03.706.700.700]
Below are MeSH descriptors whose meaning is more specific than "Peer Review, Research".
This graph shows the total number of publications written about "Peer Review, Research" by people in this website by year, and whether "Peer Review, Research" was a major or minor topic of these publications.
To see the data from this visualization as text, click here.
Year | Major Topic | Minor Topic | Total |
---|
1996 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1999 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2004 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 2007 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2009 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 2011 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 2018 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2023 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
To return to the timeline, click here.
Below are the most recent publications written about "Peer Review, Research" by people in Profiles.
-
Hicks D, Manson SM, Kohn LL. Response to Nguyen et?al: "A plea for involving American Indian researchers and allies in research and manuscript reviews". J Am Acad Dermatol. 2023 08; 89(2):e103-e104.
-
Perlis RH, Kendall-Taylor J, Hart K, Ganguli I, Berlin JA, Bradley SM, Haneuse S, Inouye SK, Jacobs EA, Morris A, Ogedegbe O, Perencevich E, Shulman LN, Trueger NS, Fihn SD, Rivara FP, Flanagin A. Peer Review in a General Medical Research Journal Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic. JAMA Netw Open. 2023 01 03; 6(1):e2253296.
-
Nicholson DN, Rubinetti V, Hu D, Thielk M, Hunter LE, Greene CS. Examining linguistic shifts between preprints and publications. PLoS Biol. 2022 02; 20(2):e3001470.
-
Bobak CA, Muse M, Giffin KA, Williamson DA, Greene CS, Moore JH, Wall DP. Human Intrigue: Meta-analysis approaches for big questions with big data while shaking up the peer review process. Pac Symp Biocomput. 2022; 27:156-162.
-
Novins DK, Althoff RR, Cortese S, Drury SS, Frazier JA, Henderson SW, McCauley E, White TJH. Editors' Best of 2019. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2020 01; 59(1):8-12.
-
Cook CE, Cleland JA, Mintken PE. Manual Therapy Cures Death: I Think I Read That Somewhere. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2018 11; 48(11):830-832.
-
Novins DK. Mentors. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2018 01; 57(1):2.
-
Allen LA, Ho PM. Peer Review of a Manuscript Submission: A How-To Guide for Effective and Efficient Commentary. Circ Heart Fail. 2017 12; 10(12).
-
Padula WV, McQueen RB, Pronovost PJ. Can Economic Model Transparency Improve Provider Interpretation of Cost-effectiveness Analysis? Evaluating Tradeoffs Presented by the Second Panel on Cost-effectiveness in Health and Medicine. Med Care. 2017 11; 55(11):909-911.
-
Wright CJ, Norman M, Kirpalani H, Johansson S. EBNEO commentaries in Acta Paediatrica: a new collaboration to advance evidence-based neonatology. Acta Paediatr. 2017 Mar; 106(3):358.
|
People  People who have written about this concept. _
Similar Concepts
People who have written about this concept.
_
Top Journals
Top journals in which articles about this concept have been published.
|