 Reproducibility of Results
"Reproducibility of Results" is a descriptor in the National Library of Medicine's controlled vocabulary thesaurus,
MeSH (Medical Subject Headings). Descriptors are arranged in a hierarchical structure,
which enables searching at various levels of specificity.
The statistical reproducibility of measurements (often in a clinical context), including the testing of instrumentation or techniques to obtain reproducible results. The concept includes reproducibility of physiological measurements, which may be used to develop rules to assess probability or prognosis, or response to a stimulus; reproducibility of occurrence of a condition; and reproducibility of experimental results.
| Descriptor ID |
D015203
|
| MeSH Number(s) |
E05.318.780.725 E05.337.851 N05.715.360.780.685 N06.850.520.445.725
|
| Concept/Terms |
Test-Retest Reliability- Test-Retest Reliability
- Reliabilities, Test-Retest
- Reliability, Test-Retest
- Test Retest Reliability
|
Below are MeSH descriptors whose meaning is more general than "Reproducibility of Results".
Below are MeSH descriptors whose meaning is more specific than "Reproducibility of Results".
This graph shows the total number of publications written about "Reproducibility of Results" by people in this website by year, and whether "Reproducibility of Results" was a major or minor topic of these publications.
To see the data from this visualization as text, click here.
| Year | Major Topic | Minor Topic | Total |
|---|
| 1996 | 0 | 13 | 13 | | 1997 | 0 | 18 | 18 | | 1998 | 0 | 19 | 19 | | 1999 | 0 | 26 | 26 | | 2000 | 0 | 28 | 28 | | 2001 | 0 | 16 | 16 | | 2002 | 0 | 31 | 31 | | 2003 | 0 | 43 | 43 | | 2004 | 0 | 61 | 61 | | 2005 | 1 | 54 | 55 | | 2006 | 0 | 66 | 66 | | 2007 | 0 | 70 | 70 | | 2008 | 1 | 108 | 109 | | 2009 | 1 | 79 | 80 | | 2010 | 0 | 77 | 77 | | 2011 | 0 | 114 | 114 | | 2012 | 0 | 96 | 96 | | 2013 | 0 | 111 | 111 | | 2014 | 0 | 122 | 122 | | 2015 | 0 | 132 | 132 | | 2016 | 2 | 162 | 164 | | 2017 | 3 | 127 | 130 | | 2018 | 0 | 153 | 153 | | 2019 | 1 | 144 | 145 | | 2020 | 0 | 134 | 134 | | 2021 | 2 | 145 | 147 | | 2022 | 0 | 101 | 101 | | 2023 | 0 | 104 | 104 | | 2024 | 0 | 96 | 96 | | 2025 | 1 | 81 | 82 | | 2026 | 0 | 33 | 33 |
To return to the timeline, click here.
Below are the most recent publications written about "Reproducibility of Results" by people in Profiles.
-
DunnGalvin A, Mai CL, Cooper JB, Shorten G, Mitchell JD, Saddawi-Konefka D, Blum RH. Reflective ability in medical trainees: reliability and practicality of a measurement instrument and assessment in a large cohort. Acad Med. 2026 Oct 01; 101(10):1308-1314.
-
Nerguizian D, Klein B, Abdelmawla F, Gomez J, Anderson PL, Bushman L, Brooks KM. Validation of an UHPLC-MS/MS Assay for the Quantification of Isoniazid and Four Major Metabolites in Human Plasma. Biomed Chromatogr. 2026 Sep; 40(9):e70550.
-
Sun C, Karakis I, Herlopian A, Ng MC, Osman G, Sheikh Z, Taraschenko O, Yoo JY, Appavu BL, Arcot Jayagopal L, Kaplan PW, Lee JW, Selioutski O, Haider HA, Halford JJ, Hoch DB, Lam A, Nascimento FA, Pathmanathan J, Schmitt S, De Stefano P, Fisch U, Gijs J, Castro-Lima H, Kong WY, Cervenka MC, Dhakar MB, Fatima S, Gaspard N, Gilmore EJ, Herman ST, Holmes MG, Johnson EL, Muniz CF, Rosenthal ES, Rodriguez Ruiz AA, Sarkis RA, Shafi MM, Swisher CB, Tabaeizadeh M, Benbadis SR, Chan F, Chu CJ, Dolatshahi M, Greenblatt AS, Katyal R, Nwankwo C, Amorim E, Tatum WO, Weber D, Loddenkemper T, Peters JM, Katwa U, Maski K, Thomas RJ, Hong S, Yuan D, Cash SS, Cole AJ, Goldenholz DM, Stow C, Kim JA, Zafar SF, Struck AF, Westover MB, Jing J. Toward unified and comprehensive automated electroencephalogram interpretation: a multicentre development and validation of an electroencephalogram foundation model. Lancet Digit Health. 2026 Sep; 8(9):101039.
-
Sakamoto Y, Bando H, Aoyagi Y, Sokuoka H, Misumi T, Oba K, Mori Y, Okui J, Miyazaki M, Sadatsuki Y, Koizumi K, Otake R, Yuri A, Tajima E, Ueno T, Nakamura T, Yoshihara H, Itoya K, Annaka R, Nakamura H, Okita N, Takahashi H, Kuroda T, Nakamura K, Yoshino T, Ohtsu A. Recommendations for generating real-world evidence with regulatory-grade relevance and reliability. Int J Clin Oncol. 2026 Oct; 31(10):2075-2086.
-
Hooli S, Reeder R, Cutler L, Sartori LF, Capraro G, Cheng AY, Cator A, Lipshaw MJ, Ambroggio L, Rees CA, McLaren SH, Moher J, Tzimenatos L, Walsh PS, Larsen CD, Ruddy RM, Shah SS, Kuppermann N, Florin TA. Reliability of Physical Examination Findings in Youths Diagnosed With Pneumonia. JAMA Netw Open. 2026 08 03; 9(8):e2630074.
-
Longino A, Campbell B, Grimm E, Neumeier A, Fainstad B. Beyond the checklist: development and validation of a multidimensional clinical competency assessment tool for bedside procedures. Acad Med. 2026 08 01; 101(8):948-953.
-
Ramos Arriaza L, Slovarp L, Abell BD, Galvosas M, Grandjean Lapierre S, Jetté ME. Validation Approaches for Cough Monitoring Tools: A Scoping Review. Lung. 2026 Jun 27; 204(1).
-
Garver-Apgar CE, Giano Z, Kayser AM, Morris CD. Factor structure and psychometric validation of the Work and Well-being Inventory. Front Public Health. 2026; 14:1816119.
-
Dicken S, DeLeon N, Gutierrez EJ, Trujillo JM. Evaluating the Quality of Artificial Intelligence-Generated Rubrics and Grading Reliability in Student-Written Reflection Assignments. Am J Pharm Educ. 2026 Aug; 90(8):102014.
-
Safer-Lichtenstein J, Villarreal J, Fernandez L, Troxel M. Limited Sensitivity and Specificity of the Spanish Social Communication Questionnaire in a Clinic Sample in Quito, Ecuador. Autism. 2026 Sep; 30(9):2427-2431.
|
People  People who have written about this concept. _
Similar Concepts
People who have written about this concept.
_
Top Journals
Top journals in which articles about this concept have been published.
|