Review Literature as Topic
"Review Literature as Topic" is a descriptor in the National Library of Medicine's controlled vocabulary thesaurus,
MeSH (Medical Subject Headings). Descriptors are arranged in a hierarchical structure,
which enables searching at various levels of specificity.
Works about published materials which provide an examination of recent or current literature. These articles can cover a wide range of subject matter at various levels of completeness and comprehensiveness based on analyses of literature that may include research findings. The review may reflect the state of the art and may also include reviews as a literary form.
Descriptor ID |
D012196
|
MeSH Number(s) |
L01.178.682.759
|
Concept/Terms |
State-of-the-Art Review- State-of-the-Art Review
- State of the Art Review
- State-of-the-Art Reviews
- Review, State-of-the-Art
- Reviews, State-of-the-Art
- State of the Art Reviews
|
Below are MeSH descriptors whose meaning is more general than "Review Literature as Topic".
Below are MeSH descriptors whose meaning is more specific than "Review Literature as Topic".
This graph shows the total number of publications written about "Review Literature as Topic" by people in this website by year, and whether "Review Literature as Topic" was a major or minor topic of these publications.
To see the data from this visualization as text, click here.
Year | Major Topic | Minor Topic | Total |
---|
1997 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 2004 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2006 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2008 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2009 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 2010 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 2011 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 2013 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 2015 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 6 | 0 | 6 | 2017 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 2018 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2019 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2020 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 2021 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2022 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2023 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
To return to the timeline, click here.
Below are the most recent publications written about "Review Literature as Topic" by people in Profiles.
-
Breslin L, Dyrbye L, Chelf C, West C. Effects of coaching on medical student well-being and distress: a systematic review protocol. BMJ Open. 2023 08 17; 13(8):e073214.
-
Chelmow D, Cejtin H, Conageski C, Farid H, Gecsi K, Kesterson J, Khan MJ, Long M, O'Hara JS, Burke W. Executive Summary of the Lower Anogenital Tract Cancer Evidence Review Conference. Obstet Gynecol. 2023 09 01; 142(3):708-724.
-
Lackey TG, Duffy JR, Green KK. A Protocol for Propofol-Infusion Drug-Induced Sleep Endoscopy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023 02; 168(2):234-240.
-
Chow SM, Nahum-Shani I, Baker JT, Spruijt-Metz D, Allen NB, Auerbach RP, Dunton GF, Friedman NP, Intille SS, Klasnja P, Marlin B, Nock MK, Rauch SL, Pavel M, Vrieze S, Wetter DW, Kleiman EM, Brick TR, Perry H, Wolff-Hughes DL. The ILHBN: challenges, opportunities, and solutions from harmonizing data under heterogeneous study designs, target populations, and measurement protocols. Transl Behav Med. 2023 01 20; 13(1):7-16.
-
Pega F, Momen NC, Gagliardi D, Bero LA, Boccuni F, Chartres N, Descatha A, Dzhambov AM, Godderis L, Loney T, Mandrioli D, Modenese A, van der Molen HF, Morgan RL, Neupane S, Pachito D, Paulo MS, Prakash KC, Scheepers PTJ, Teixeira L, Tenkate T, Woodruff TJ, Norris SL. Assessing the quality of evidence in studies estimating prevalence of exposure to occupational risk factors: The QoE-SPEO approach applied in the systematic reviews from the WHO/ILO Joint Estimates of the Work-related burden of disease and Injury. Environ Int. 2022 03; 161:107136.
-
Chen C, Scott F, Ipaktchi KR, Lauder A. Postoperative Digit and Hand Replantation Protocols: A Review of the Literature. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2021 Aug 01; 29(15):e732-e742.
-
Oldham WM, Hemnes AR, Aldred MA, Barnard J, Brittain EL, Chan SY, Cheng F, Cho MH, Desai AA, Garcia JGN, Geraci MW, Ghiassian SD, Hall KT, Horn EM, Jain M, Kelly RS, Leopold JA, Lindstrom S, Modena BD, Nichols WC, Rhodes CJ, Sun W, Sweatt AJ, Vanderpool RR, Wilkins MR, Wilmot B, Zamanian RT, Fessel JP, Aggarwal NR, Loscalzo J, Xiao L. NHLBI-CMREF Workshop Report on Pulmonary Vascular Disease?Classification: JACC State-of-the-Art Review. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021 04 27; 77(16):2040-2052.
-
Nejstgaard CH, Bero L, Hr?bjartsson A, J?rgensen AW, J?rgensen KJ, Le M, Lundh A. Association between conflicts of interest and favourable recommendations in clinical guidelines, advisory committee reports, opinion pieces, and narrative reviews: systematic review. BMJ. 2020 12 09; 371:m4234.
-
Nejstgaard CH, Bero L, Hr?bjartsson A, J?rgensen AW, J?rgensen KJ, Le M, Lundh A. Conflicts of interest in clinical guidelines, advisory committee reports, opinion pieces, and narrative reviews: associations with recommendations. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 12 08; 12:MR000040.
-
Litchman ML, Oser TK, Hodgson L, Heyman M, Walker HR, Deroze P, Rinker J, Warshaw H. In-Person and Technology-Mediated Peer Support in Diabetes Care: A Systematic Review of Reviews and Gap Analysis. Diabetes Educ. 2020 06; 46(3):230-241.
|
People  People who have written about this concept. _
Similar Concepts
People who have written about this concept.
_
Top Journals
Top journals in which articles about this concept have been published.
|