 Researcher-Subject Relations
"Researcher-Subject Relations" is a descriptor in the National Library of Medicine's controlled vocabulary thesaurus,
MeSH (Medical Subject Headings). Descriptors are arranged in a hierarchical structure,
which enables searching at various levels of specificity.
Interaction between research personnel and research subjects.
| Descriptor ID |
D035844
|
| MeSH Number(s) |
F01.829.401.650.837
|
| Concept/Terms |
Researcher-Subject Relations- Researcher-Subject Relations
- Relations, Researcher-Subject
- Researcher Subject Relations
- Investigator-Subject Relations
- Investigator Subject Relations
- Investigator-Subject Relation
- Relation, Investigator-Subject
- Relations, Investigator-Subject
- Investigator-Subject Relationship
- Investigator Subject Relationship
- Investigator-Subject Relationships
- Relationship, Investigator-Subject
- Relationships, Investigator-Subject
- Researcher Subject Relationship
- Researcher Subject Relationships
|
Below are MeSH descriptors whose meaning is more general than "Researcher-Subject Relations".
Below are MeSH descriptors whose meaning is more specific than "Researcher-Subject Relations".
This graph shows the total number of publications written about "Researcher-Subject Relations" by people in this website by year, and whether "Researcher-Subject Relations" was a major or minor topic of these publications.
To see the data from this visualization as text, click here.
| Year | Major Topic | Minor Topic | Total |
|---|
| 2011 | 0 | 1 | 1 | | 2014 | 0 | 1 | 1 | | 2017 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
To return to the timeline, click here.
Below are the most recent publications written about "Researcher-Subject Relations" by people in Profiles.
-
Claw KG, Lippert D, Bardill J, Cordova A, Fox K, Yracheta JM, Bader AC, Bolnick DA, Malhi RS, TallBear K, Garrison NA. Chaco Canyon Dig Unearths Ethical Concerns. Hum Biol. 2017 07; 89(3):177-180.
-
Mealer M, Jones Rn J. Methodological and ethical issues related to qualitative telephone interviews on sensitive topics. Nurse Res. 2014 Mar; 21(4):32-7.
-
Cook C. Email interviewing: generating data with a vulnerable population. J Adv Nurs. 2012 Jun; 68(6):1330-9.
-
Nicholson LM, Schwirian PM, Klein EG, Skybo T, Murray-Johnson L, Eneli I, Boettner B, French GM, Groner JA. Recruitment and retention strategies in longitudinal clinical studies with low-income populations. Contemp Clin Trials. 2011 May; 32(3):353-62.
-
Shagi C, Vallely A, Kasindi S, Chiduo B, Desmond N, Soteli S, Kavit N, Vallely L, Lees S, Hayes R, Ross D. A model for community representation and participation in HIV prevention trials among women who engage in transactional sex in Africa. AIDS Care. 2008 Oct; 20(9):1039-49.
-
Vallely A, Shagi C, Kasindi S, Desmond N, Lees S, Chiduo B, Hayes R, Allen C, Ross D. The benefits of participatory methodologies to develop effective community dialogue in the context of a microbicide trial feasibility study in Mwanza, Tanzania. BMC Public Health. 2007 Jul 02; 7:133.
-
Bell SG, Newcomer SF, Bachrach C, Borawski E, Jemmott JB, Morrison D, Stanton B, Tortolero S, Zimmerman R. Challenges in replicating interventions. J Adolesc Health. 2007 Jun; 40(6):514-20.
-
Melton GB. Ethical judgments amid uncertainty: dilemmas in the AIDS epidemic. Couns Psychol. 1991 Oct; 19(4):561-5.
-
Melton GB. Certificates of confidentiality under the Public Health Service Act: strong protection but not enough. Violence Vict. 1990; 5(1):67-71.
-
Stanley B, Sieber JE, Melton GB. Empirical studies of ethical issues in research. A research agenda. Am Psychol. 1987 Jul; 42(7):735-41.
|
People  People who have written about this concept. _
Similar Concepts
People who have written about this concept.
_
Top Journals
Top journals in which articles about this concept have been published.
|