Connection
Aimee Gardner to Curriculum
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Aimee Gardner has written about Curriculum.
|
|
| |
Connection Strength |
|
 |
|
 |
| |
1.746 |
|
|
|
-
Gardner AK, Timberlake MD, Dunkin BJ. Faculty Development for the Operating Room: An Examination of the Effectiveness of an Intraoperative Teaching Course for Surgeons. Ann Surg. 2019 01; 269(1):184-190.
Score: 0.346
-
Gardner AK, D'Onofrio BC, Dunkin BJ. Can We Get Faculty Interviewers on the Same Page? An Examination of a Structured Interview Course for Surgeons. J Surg Educ. 2018 Jan - Feb; 75(1):72-77.
Score: 0.314
-
Seifman MA, Woodward-Kron R, Kagan RY, Dalrymple K, Gardner AK, Incoll I, Konge L, Paige JT, Nestel D. The Anatomy of Change: A Scoping Review of Surgical Curriculum Renewal Processes. Perspect Med Educ. 2025; 14(1):956-973.
Score: 0.140
-
Barnett M, Pillow MT, Carnell J, Rohra A, DeSandro S, Gardner AK. Informing the Revolution: A Needs Assessment of Ultrasound Knowledge and Skills Among Graduating Physician Assistant Students. J Physician Assist Educ. 2018 Sep; 29(3):173-176.
Score: 0.085
-
Gardner AK, Lim G, Minard CG, Guffey D, Pillow MT. A Cross-Specialty Examination of Resident Error Disclosure and Communication Skills Using Simulation. J Grad Med Educ. 2018 Aug; 10(4):438-441.
Score: 0.084
-
Ritter EM, Lineberry M, Hashimoto DA, Gee D, Guzzetta AA, Scott DJ, Gardner AK. Simulation-based mastery learning significantly reduces gender differences on the Fundamentals of Endoscopic Surgery performance exam. Surg Endosc. 2018 12; 32(12):5006-5011.
Score: 0.084
-
AbdelFattah KR, Spalding MC, Leshikar D, Gardner AK. Team-based simulations for new surgeons: Does early and often make a difference? Surgery. 2018 04; 163(4):912-915.
Score: 0.080
-
Franklin BR, Placek SB, Gardner AK, Korndorffer JR, Wagner MD, Pearl JP, Ritter EM. Preparing for the American Board of Surgery Flexible Endoscopy Curriculum: Development of multi-institutional proficiency-based training standards and pilot testing of a simulation-based mastery learning curriculum for the Endoscopy Training System. Am J Surg. 2018 07; 216(1):167-173.
Score: 0.079
-
Ritter EM, Taylor ZA, Wolf KR, Franklin BR, Placek SB, Korndorffer JR, Gardner AK. Simulation-based mastery learning for endoscopy using the endoscopy training system: a strategy to improve endoscopic skills and prepare for the fundamentals of endoscopic surgery (FES) manual skills exam. Surg Endosc. 2018 01; 32(1):413-420.
Score: 0.078
-
Nassour I, Spalding MC, Hynan LS, Gardner AK, Williams BH. The surgeon-performed ultrasound: a curriculum to improve residents' basic ultrasound knowledge. J Surg Res. 2017 06 01; 213:51-59.
Score: 0.076
-
Gardner AK, Waters V, McLaughlin RJ. What Do Faculty in Health Professions Need to be Competent Educators? Results from a School-Wide Needs Assessment. J Allied Health. 2017; 46(4):e77-e80.
Score: 0.075
-
Gardner AK, Steffes CP, Nepomnayshy D, Nicholas C, Widmann WD, Fitzgibbons SC, Dunkin BJ, Jones DB, Paige JT. Selection bias: Examining the feasibility, utility, and participant receptivity to incorporating simulation into the general surgery residency selection process. Am J Surg. 2017 Jun; 213(6):1171-1177.
Score: 0.074
-
Vyasa P, Willis RE, Dunkin BJ, Gardner AK. Are General Surgery Residents Accurate Assessors of Their Own Flexible Endoscopy Skills? J Surg Educ. 2017 Jan - Feb; 74(1):23-29.
Score: 0.073
-
Gardner AK, Scott DJ, Willis RE, Van Sickle K, Truitt MS, Uecker J, Brown KM, Marks JM, Dunkin BJ. Is current surgery resident and GI fellow training adequate to pass FES? Surg Endosc. 2017 01; 31(1):352-358.
Score: 0.072
-
Gardner AK, Willis RE, Dunkin BJ, Van Sickle KR, Brown KM, Truitt MS, Uecker JM, Gentry L, Scott DJ. What do residents need to be competent laparoscopic and endoscopic surgeons? Surg Endosc. 2016 07; 30(7):3050-9.
Score: 0.069
-
Gomez PP, Willis RE, Schiffer BL, Gardner AK, Scott DJ. External validation and evaluation of an intermediate proficiency-based knot-tying and suturing curriculum. J Surg Educ. 2014 Nov-Dec; 71(6):839-45.
Score: 0.016
|
Connection Strength
The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.
Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.
|