Connection
Kurt Beam to Protein Binding
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Kurt Beam has written about Protein Binding.
|
|
Connection Strength |
|
![](https://profiles.ucdenver.edu/Framework/Images/connection_left.gif) |
|
![](https://profiles.ucdenver.edu/Framework/Images/connection_right.gif) |
|
0.358 |
|
|
|
-
Polster A, Nelson BR, Papadopoulos S, Olson EN, Beam KG. Stac proteins associate with the critical domain for excitation-contraction coupling in the II-III loop of CaV1.1. J Gen Physiol. 2018 04 02; 150(4):613-624.
Score: 0.103
-
Ohrtman JD, Romberg CF, Moua O, Bannister RA, Levinson SR, Beam KG. Apparent lack of physical or functional interaction between CaV1.1 and its distal C terminus. J Gen Physiol. 2015 Apr; 145(4):303-14.
Score: 0.084
-
Lorenzon NM, Beam KG. Accessibility of targeted DHPR sites to streptavidin and functional effects of binding on EC coupling. J Gen Physiol. 2007 Oct; 130(4):379-88.
Score: 0.050
-
Leuranguer V, Papadopoulos S, Beam KG. Organization of calcium channel beta1a subunits in triad junctions in skeletal muscle. J Biol Chem. 2006 Feb 10; 281(6):3521-7.
Score: 0.044
-
Nakai J, Sekiguchi N, Rando TA, Allen PD, Beam KG. Two regions of the ryanodine receptor involved in coupling with L-type Ca2+ channels. J Biol Chem. 1998 May 29; 273(22):13403-6.
Score: 0.026
-
Polster A, Perni S, Filipova D, Moua O, Ohrtman JD, Bichraoui H, Beam KG, Papadopoulos S. Junctional trafficking and restoration of retrograde signaling by the cytoplasmic RyR1 domain. J Gen Physiol. 2018 02 05; 150(2):293-306.
Score: 0.025
-
Ohrtman J, Ritter B, Polster A, Beam KG, Papadopoulos S. Sequence differences in the IQ motifs of CaV1.1 and CaV1.2 strongly impact calmodulin binding and calcium-dependent inactivation. J Biol Chem. 2008 Oct 24; 283(43):29301-11.
Score: 0.013
-
Sheridan DC, Takekura H, Franzini-Armstrong C, Beam KG, Allen PD, Perez CF. Bidirectional signaling between calcium channels of skeletal muscle requires multiple direct and indirect interactions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Dec 26; 103(52):19760-5.
Score: 0.012
|
Connection Strength
The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.
Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.
|