Connection
Aimee Gardner to Clinical Competence
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Aimee Gardner has written about Clinical Competence.
|
|
| |
Connection Strength |
|
 |
|
 |
| |
6.543 |
|
|
|
-
Gardner AK, Costa P. Predicting Surgical Resident Performance With Situational Judgment Tests. Acad Med. 2024 08 01; 99(8):884-888.
Score: 0.457
-
Gardner AK, Dunkin BJ. Pursuing Excellence: The Power of Selection Science to Provide Meaningful Data and Enhance Efficiency in Selecting Surgical Trainees. Ann Surg. 2019 07; 270(1):188-192.
Score: 0.331
-
Miller M, Mullen A, Gardner A. What clinical rotation factors have an impact on trainee success? Clin Teach. 2019 06; 16(3):263-268.
Score: 0.313
-
Ritter EM, Lineberry M, Hashimoto DA, Gee D, Guzzetta AA, Scott DJ, Gardner AK. Simulation-based mastery learning significantly reduces gender differences on the Fundamentals of Endoscopic Surgery performance exam. Surg Endosc. 2018 12; 32(12):5006-5011.
Score: 0.309
-
Gardner AK, Dunkin BJ. Evaluation of Validity Evidence for Personality, Emotional Intelligence, and Situational Judgment Tests to Identify Successful Residents. JAMA Surg. 2018 05 01; 153(5):409-416.
Score: 0.305
-
Timberlake MD, Stefanidis D, Gardner AK. Examining the impact of surgical coaching on trainee physiologic response and basic skill acquisition. Surg Endosc. 2018 10; 32(10):4183-4190.
Score: 0.303
-
Joshi K, Hernandez J, Martinez J, AbdelFattah K, Gardner AK. Should they stay or should they go now? Exploring the impact of team familiarity on interprofessional team training outcomes. Am J Surg. 2018 Feb; 215(2):243-249.
Score: 0.295
-
Gardner AK, Grantcharov T, Dunkin BJ. The Science of Selection: Using Best Practices From Industry to Improve Success in Surgery Training. J Surg Educ. 2018 Mar - Apr; 75(2):278-285.
Score: 0.289
-
Ritter EM, Taylor ZA, Wolf KR, Franklin BR, Placek SB, Korndorffer JR, Gardner AK. Simulation-based mastery learning for endoscopy using the endoscopy training system: a strategy to improve endoscopic skills and prepare for the fundamentals of endoscopic surgery (FES) manual skills exam. Surg Endosc. 2018 01; 32(1):413-420.
Score: 0.288
-
Gardner AK, Ujiki MB, Dunkin BJ. Passing the fundamentals of endoscopic surgery (FES) exam: linking specialty choice and attitudes about endoscopic surgery to success. Surg Endosc. 2018 Jan; 32(1):225-228.
Score: 0.287
-
Gardner AK, AbdelFattah K. Comparison of simulation-based assessments and faculty ratings for general surgery resident milestone evaluation: Are they telling the same story? Am J Surg. 2017 Sep; 214(3):547-553.
Score: 0.271
-
Vyasa P, Willis RE, Dunkin BJ, Gardner AK. Are General Surgery Residents Accurate Assessors of Their Own Flexible Endoscopy Skills? J Surg Educ. 2017 Jan - Feb; 74(1):23-29.
Score: 0.271
-
Gardner AK, Scott DJ, Willis RE, Van Sickle K, Truitt MS, Uecker J, Brown KM, Marks JM, Dunkin BJ. Is current surgery resident and GI fellow training adequate to pass FES? Surg Endosc. 2017 01; 31(1):352-358.
Score: 0.268
-
Gardner AK, Scott DJ. Repaying in Kind: Examination of the Reciprocity Effect in Faculty and Resident Evaluations. J Surg Educ. 2016 Nov - Dec; 73(6):e91-e94.
Score: 0.266
-
Gardner AK, Russo MA, Jabbour II, Kosemund M, Scott DJ. Frame-of-reference training for simulation-based intraoperative communication assessment. Am J Surg. 2016 Sep; 212(3):548-551.e2.
Score: 0.266
-
Gardner AK, Willis RE, Dunkin BJ, Van Sickle KR, Brown KM, Truitt MS, Uecker JM, Gentry L, Scott DJ. What do residents need to be competent laparoscopic and endoscopic surgeons? Surg Endosc. 2016 07; 30(7):3050-9.
Score: 0.256
-
Gardner AK, Jabbour IJ, Williams BH, Huerta S. Different Goals, Different Pathways: The Role of Metacognition and Task Engagement in Surgical Skill Acquisition. J Surg Educ. 2016 Jan-Feb; 73(1):61-5.
Score: 0.255
-
Gardner AK, Scott DJ, Hebert JC, Mellinger JD, Frey-Vogel A, Ten Eyck RP, Davis BR, Sillin LF, Sachdeva AK. Gearing up for milestones in surgery: Will simulation play a role? Surgery. 2015 Nov; 158(5):1421-7.
Score: 0.249
-
Chen JH, Gardner AK. Going Above and Beyond With SJTs: Impact of Applicant Characteristics on Open Response SJT Participation. J Surg Educ. 2024 08; 81(8):1024-1033.
Score: 0.116
-
Gupta R, DeSandro S, Doherty NA, Gardner AK, Pillow MT. Medical and Physician Assistant Student Competence in Basic Life Support: Opportunities to Improve Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Training. West J Emerg Med. 2020 Dec 15; 22(1):101-107.
Score: 0.091
-
Costa P, Harris L, Rothstein DH, Beckman M, Flynn W, Hoffman A, Lukan J, Gardner A, Cavanaugh K, Dunkin B, Schwaitzberg SD. Dissecting a department of surgery: Exploring organizational culture and competency expectations. Am J Surg. 2021 02; 221(2):298-302.
Score: 0.091
-
Gardner AK, Cavanaugh KJ, Willis RE, Dent D, Reinhart H, Williams M, Truitt MS, Scott BG, Dunkin BJ. Great Expectations? Future Competency Requirements Among Candidates Entering Surgery Training. J Surg Educ. 2020 Mar - Apr; 77(2):267-272.
Score: 0.084
-
Ritter EM, Gardner AK, Dunkin BJ, Schultz L, Pryor AD, Feldman L. Video-based assessment for laparoscopic fundoplication: initial development of a robust tool for operative performance assessment. Surg Endosc. 2020 07; 34(7):3176-3183.
Score: 0.084
-
Gardner AK, Timberlake MD, Dunkin BJ. Faculty Development for the Operating Room: An Examination of the Effectiveness of an Intraoperative Teaching Course for Surgeons. Ann Surg. 2019 01; 269(1):184-190.
Score: 0.080
-
Gardner AK, Dunkin BJ. How We Measure Surgical Trainee Performance Matters-Reply. JAMA Surg. 2018 09 01; 153(9):865.
Score: 0.078
-
Barnett M, Pillow MT, Carnell J, Rohra A, DeSandro S, Gardner AK. Informing the Revolution: A Needs Assessment of Ultrasound Knowledge and Skills Among Graduating Physician Assistant Students. J Physician Assist Educ. 2018 Sep; 29(3):173-176.
Score: 0.078
-
AbdelFattah KR, Spalding MC, Leshikar D, Gardner AK. Team-based simulations for new surgeons: Does early and often make a difference? Surgery. 2018 04; 163(4):912-915.
Score: 0.074
-
Franklin BR, Placek SB, Gardner AK, Korndorffer JR, Wagner MD, Pearl JP, Ritter EM. Preparing for the American Board of Surgery Flexible Endoscopy Curriculum: Development of multi-institutional proficiency-based training standards and pilot testing of a simulation-based mastery learning curriculum for the Endoscopy Training System. Am J Surg. 2018 07; 216(1):167-173.
Score: 0.073
-
Nassour I, Spalding MC, Hynan LS, Gardner AK, Williams BH. The surgeon-performed ultrasound: a curriculum to improve residents' basic ultrasound knowledge. J Surg Res. 2017 06 01; 213:51-59.
Score: 0.070
-
Gardner AK, Steffes CP, Nepomnayshy D, Nicholas C, Widmann WD, Fitzgibbons SC, Dunkin BJ, Jones DB, Paige JT. Selection bias: Examining the feasibility, utility, and participant receptivity to incorporating simulation into the general surgery residency selection process. Am J Surg. 2017 Jun; 213(6):1171-1177.
Score: 0.068
-
Al Fayyadh MJ, Heller SF, Rajab TK, Gardner AK, Bloom JP, Rawlings JA, Mullen JT, Smink DS, Farley DR, Willis RE, Dent DL. Predicting Success of Preliminary Surgical Residents: A Multi-Institutional Study. J Surg Educ. 2016 Nov - Dec; 73(6):e77-e83.
Score: 0.067
-
Gardner AK, Ritter EM, Paige JT, Ahmed RA, Fernandez G, Dunkin BJ. Simulation-Based Selection of Surgical Trainees: Considerations, Challenges, and Opportunities. J Am Coll Surg. 2016 09; 223(3):530-6.
Score: 0.067
-
Gardner AK, Scott DJ, Choti MA, Mansour JC. Developing a comprehensive resident education evaluation system in the era of milestone assessment. J Surg Educ. 2015 Jul-Aug; 72(4):618-24.
Score: 0.061
-
Gomez PP, Willis RE, Schiffer BL, Gardner AK, Scott DJ. External validation and evaluation of an intermediate proficiency-based knot-tying and suturing curriculum. J Surg Educ. 2014 Nov-Dec; 71(6):839-45.
Score: 0.058
-
Weis HB, Pickett ML, Weis JJ, Dorsey O, Bailey LW, Gardner AK, Napier R, AbdelFattah KR. Faculty Emotional Intelligence Matters for Resident Education. J Surg Educ. 2020 Sep - Oct; 77(5):1132-1137.
Score: 0.022
|
Connection Strength
The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.
Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.
|