 Connection
Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer to Neoplasms
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer has written about Neoplasms.
|
|
| |
Connection Strength |
|
 |
|
 |
| |
0.188 |
|
|
|
-
Kirby J, Prior F, Petrick N, Hadjiski L, Farahani K, Drukker K, Kalpathy-Cramer J, Glide-Hurst C, El Naqa I. Introduction to special issue on datasets hosted in The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA). Med Phys. 2020 Dec; 47(12):6026-6028.
Score: 0.070
-
Yankeelov TE, Mankoff DA, Schwartz LH, Lieberman FS, Buatti JM, Mountz JM, Erickson BJ, Fennessy FM, Huang W, Kalpathy-Cramer J, Wahl RL, Linden HM, Kinahan PE, Zhao B, Hylton NM, Gillies RJ, Clarke L, Nordstrom R, Rubin DL. Quantitative Imaging in Cancer Clinical Trials. Clin Cancer Res. 2016 Jan 15; 22(2):284-90.
Score: 0.050
-
Kalpathy-Cramer J, Bedrick SD, Boccia K, Fuller CD. A pilot prospective feasibility study of organ-at-risk definition using Target Contour Testing/Instructional Computer Software (TaCTICS), a training and evaluation platform for radiotherapy target delineation. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2011; 2011:654-63.
Score: 0.037
-
McNitt-Gray M, Napel S, Jaggi A, Mattonen SA, Hadjiiski L, Muzi M, Goldgof D, Balagurunathan Y, Pierce LA, Kinahan PE, Jones EF, Nguyen A, Virkud A, Chan HP, Emaminejad N, Wahi-Anwar M, Daly M, Abdalah M, Yang H, Lu L, Lv W, Rahmim A, Gastounioti A, Pati S, Bakas S, Kontos D, Zhao B, Kalpathy-Cramer J, Farahani K. Standardization in Quantitative Imaging: A Multicenter Comparison of Radiomic Features from Different Software Packages on Digital Reference Objects and Patient Data Sets. Tomography. 2020 06; 6(2):118-128.
Score: 0.017
-
Bane O, Hectors SJ, Wagner M, Arlinghaus LL, Aryal MP, Cao Y, Chenevert TL, Fennessy F, Huang W, Hylton NM, Kalpathy-Cramer J, Keenan KE, Malyarenko DI, Mulkern RV, Newitt DC, Russek SE, Stupic KF, Tudorica A, Wilmes LJ, Yankeelov TE, Yen YF, Boss MA, Taouli B. Accuracy, repeatability, and interplatform reproducibility of T1 quantification methods used for DCE-MRI: Results from a multicenter phantom study. Magn Reson Med. 2018 05; 79(5):2564-2575.
Score: 0.014
|
Connection Strength
The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.
Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.
|