 Connection
Lisa Bero to Review Literature as Topic
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Lisa Bero has written about Review Literature as Topic.
|
|
| |
Connection Strength |
|
 |
|
 |
| |
5.857 |
|
|
|
-
Bero L. Systematic Review: A Method at Risk for Being Corrupted. Am J Public Health. 2017 Jan; 107(1):93-96.
Score: 0.563
-
Mandrioli D, Kearns CE, Bero LA. Relationship between Research Outcomes and Risk of Bias, Study Sponsorship, and Author Financial Conflicts of Interest in Reviews of the Effects of Artificially Sweetened Beverages on Weight Outcomes: A Systematic Review of Reviews. PLoS One. 2016; 11(9):e0162198.
Score: 0.556
-
Schroll J, Bero L. Regulatory agencies hold the key to improving Cochrane reviews of drugs. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Apr 20; 4:ED000098.
Score: 0.505
-
Bero L. What is in a name? Nonfinancial influences on the outcomes of systematic reviews and guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014 Nov; 67(11):1239-41.
Score: 0.481
-
Bero LA. Why the Cochrane risk of bias tool should include funding source as a standard item. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Dec 20; (12):ED000075.
Score: 0.460
-
Wolfe N, G?tzsche PC, Bero L. Strategies for obtaining unpublished drug trial data: a qualitative interview study. Syst Rev. 2013 May 16; 2:31.
Score: 0.442
-
Bero L, Busuttil G, Farquhar C, Koehlmoos TP, Moher D, Nylenna M, Smith R, Tovey D. Measuring the performance of the Cochrane library. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Nov 14; 12:ED000048.
Score: 0.426
-
Bero LA, Binder L. The Cochrane Collaboration review prioritization projects show that a variety of approaches successfully identify high-priority topics. J Clin Epidemiol. 2013 May; 66(5):472-3.
Score: 0.421
-
Bero LA, Ghersi D. Making systematic reviews global. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Feb 16; (8):ED000020.
Score: 0.378
-
Mowatt G, Shirran L, Grimshaw JM, Rennie D, Flanagin A, Yank V, MacLennan G, G?tzsche PC, Bero LA. Prevalence of honorary and ghost authorship in Cochrane reviews. JAMA. 2002 Jun 05; 287(21):2769-71.
Score: 0.207
-
Nejstgaard CH, Bero L, Hr?bjartsson A, J?rgensen AW, J?rgensen KJ, Le M, Lundh A. Association between conflicts of interest and favourable recommendations in clinical guidelines, advisory committee reports, opinion pieces, and narrative reviews: systematic review. BMJ. 2020 12 09; 371:m4234.
Score: 0.187
-
Chiu K, McDonald S, Legg T, Karanges EA, Bero L. Policies affecting the supply and access of opioid analgesics: a scoping review protocol. JBI Evid Synth. 2020 05; 18(5):1124-1134.
Score: 0.179
-
Bero LA, Jadad AR. How consumers and policymakers can use systematic reviews for decision making. Ann Intern Med. 1997 Jul 01; 127(1):37-42.
Score: 0.147
-
Lawrence M, Naude C, Armstrong R, Bero L, Covic N, Durao S, Ghersi D, Macdonald G, MacLehose H, Margetts B, Tovey D, Volmink J, Young T. A call to action to reshape evidence synthesis and use for nutrition policy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Nov 21; 11:ED000118.
Score: 0.141
-
Morgan RL, Thayer KA, Bero L, Bruce N, Falck-Ytter Y, Ghersi D, Guyatt G, Hooijmans C, Langendam M, Mandrioli D, Mustafa RA, Rehfuess EA, Rooney AA, Shea B, Silbergeld EK, Sutton P, Wolfe MS, Woodruff TJ, Verbeek JH, Holloway AC, Santesso N, Sch?nemann HJ. GRADE: Assessing the quality of evidence in environmental and occupational health. Environ Int. 2016 Jul-Aug; 92-93:611-6.
Score: 0.133
-
Formoso G, Marata AM, Magrini N, Bero L. A clearer view of evidence in treating macular degeneration: off-label policies and independent research. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Sep 15; (9):ED000090.
Score: 0.121
-
Roseman M, Turner EH, Lexchin J, Coyne JC, Bero LA, Thombs BD. Reporting of conflicts of interest from drug trials in Cochrane reviews: cross sectional study. BMJ. 2012 Aug 16; 345:e5155.
Score: 0.105
-
Hart B, Lundh A, Bero L. Effect of reporting bias on meta-analyses of drug trials: reanalysis of meta-analyses. BMJ. 2012 Jan 03; 344:d7202.
Score: 0.100
-
Odierna DH, Bero LA. Systematic reviews reveal unrepresentative evidence for the development of drug formularies for poor and nonwhite populations. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Dec; 62(12):1268-78.
Score: 0.083
-
Rochon PA, Bero LA, Bay AM, Gold JL, Dergal JM, Binns MA, Streiner DL, Gurwitz JH. Comparison of review articles published in peer-reviewed and throwaway journals. JAMA. 2002 Jun 05; 287(21):2853-6.
Score: 0.052
-
Pega F, Momen NC, Gagliardi D, Bero LA, Boccuni F, Chartres N, Descatha A, Dzhambov AM, Godderis L, Loney T, Mandrioli D, Modenese A, van der Molen HF, Morgan RL, Neupane S, Pachito D, Paulo MS, Prakash KC, Scheepers PTJ, Teixeira L, Tenkate T, Woodruff TJ, Norris SL. Assessing the quality of evidence in studies estimating prevalence of exposure to occupational risk factors: The QoE-SPEO approach applied in the systematic reviews from the WHO/ILO Joint Estimates of the Work-related burden of disease and Injury. Environ Int. 2022 03; 161:107136.
Score: 0.051
-
Nejstgaard CH, Bero L, Hr?bjartsson A, J?rgensen AW, J?rgensen KJ, Le M, Lundh A. Conflicts of interest in clinical guidelines, advisory committee reports, opinion pieces, and narrative reviews: associations with recommendations. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 12 08; 12:MR000040.
Score: 0.047
-
Trevena H, Reeve B, Bero L, Thow AM. Private food safety standards in the global food supply chain: a scoping review protocol. JBI Evid Synth. 2020 01; 18(1):97-107.
Score: 0.044
-
Mahady SE, Schlub T, Bero L, Moher D, Tovey D, George J, Craig JC. Side effects are incompletely reported among systematic reviews in gastroenterology. J Clin Epidemiol. 2015 Feb; 68(2):144-53.
Score: 0.030
|
Connection Strength
The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.
Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.
|