 Connection
Co-Authors
This is a "connection" page, showing publications co-authored by Sean Oser and Tamara Oser.
|
|
| |
Connection Strength |
|
 |
|
 |
| |
8.171 |
|
|
|
-
Oser TK, Hall TL, Dickinson LM, Callen E, Carroll JK, Nease DE, Michaels L, Oser SM. Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Primary Care: Understanding and Supporting Clinicians' Use to Enhance Diabetes Care. Ann Fam Med. 2022 Nov-Dec; 20(6):541-547.
Score: 0.831
-
Oser TK, Oser SM. Glycemic Targets and Glucose Monitoring. Prim Care. 2022 Jun; 49(2):213-223.
Score: 0.801
-
Oser TK, Litchman ML, Allen NA, Kwan BM, Fisher L, Jortberg BT, Polonsky WH, Oser SM. Personal Continuous Glucose Monitoring Use Among Adults with Type 2 Diabetes: Clinical Efficacy and Economic Impacts. Curr Diab Rep. 2021 12 09; 21(11):49.
Score: 0.781
-
Oser SM, Oser TK. Qualitative Content Analysis of Type 1 Diabetes Caregiver Blogs and Correlations With Caregiver Challenges and Successes. J Patient Exp. 2020 Dec; 7(6):957-963.
Score: 0.727
-
Oser SM, Oser TK. Diabetes Technologies: We Are All in This Together. Clin Diabetes. 2020 Apr; 38(2):188-189.
Score: 0.695
-
Oser SM, Stuckey HL, Parascando JA, McGinley EL, Berg A, Oser TK. Glycated Hemoglobin Differences Among Blog-Reading Adults With Type 1 Diabetes Compared With Those Who Do Not Read Blogs: Cross-Sectional Study. JMIR Diabetes. 2019 Apr 02; 4(2):e13634.
Score: 0.648
-
Oser TK, Minnehan KA, Wong G, Parascando J, McGinley E, Radico J, Oser SM. Using Social Media to Broaden Understanding of the Barriers and Facilitators to Exercise in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2019 05; 13(3):457-465.
Score: 0.645
-
Hall TL, Dickinson LM, Warman MK, Oser TK, Oser SM. Continuous glucose monitoring among nurse practitioners in primary care: Characteristics associated with prescribing and resources needed to support use. J Am Assoc Nurse Pract. 2025 Apr 01; 37(4):207-216.
Score: 0.246
-
Oser C, Parascando JA, Kostiuk M, Nagel KE, Oser SM, Huss K, Westfeldt E, Prince B, Oser TK. Experiences of People With Type 1 Diabetes Using the iLet Bionic Pancreas in Primary Care: A Qualitative Analysis. Clin Diabetes. 2025; 43(1):109-122.
Score: 0.237
-
Hall T, Warman MK, Oser T, Filippi MK, Manning B, Carroll JK, Nease DE, Staton EW, Oser S. Clinician-Reported Barriers and Needs for Implementation of Continuous Glucose Monitoring. J Am Board Fam Med. 2024 Jul-Aug; 37(4):671-679.
Score: 0.233
-
Filippi MK, Oser SM, Alai J, Brooks-Greisen A, Oser TK. A Team-Based Training for Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Diabetes Care: Mixed Methods Pilot Implementation Study in Primary Care Practices. JMIR Form Res. 2023 Apr 24; 7:e45189.
Score: 0.215
-
Messer LH, Vigers T, Akturk HK, Forlenza GP, Huss KB, Karami AJ, Malecha E, Oser SM, Polsky S, Pyle L, Shah VN, Wadwa RP, Oser TK. Increasing Use of Diabetes Devices: What Do Health Care Professionals Need? Clin Diabetes. 2023; 41(3):386-398.
Score: 0.213
-
Hall T, Dickinson LM, Callen E, Nease D, Carroll J, Oser T, Warman M, Michaels L, Oser S. Relationship of primary care clinician characteristics with continuous glucose monitoring use and confidence. Ann Fam Med. 2022 04 01; (20 Suppl 1).
Score: 0.199
-
O'Donovan A, Oser SM, Parascando J, Berg A, Nease DE, Oser TK. Determining the Perception and Willingness of Primary Care Providers to Prescribe Advanced Diabetes Technologies. J Patient Cent Res Rev. 2021; 8(3):272-276.
Score: 0.190
-
Oser TK, Oser SM, Parascando JA, Grisolano LA, Krishna KB, Hale DE, Litchman M, Majidi S, Haidet P. Challenges and Successes in Raising a Child With Type 1 Diabetes and Autism Spectrum Disorder: Mixed Methods Study. J Med Internet Res. 2020 06 03; 22(6):e17184.
Score: 0.176
-
Oser TK, Oser SM, Parascando JA, Hessler-Jones D, Sciamanna CN, Sparling K, Nease D, Litchman ML. Social Media in the Diabetes Community: a Novel Way to Assess Psychosocial Needs in People with Diabetes and Their Caregivers. Curr Diab Rep. 2020 02 20; 20(3):10.
Score: 0.172
-
Litchman ML, Oser TK, Wawrzynski SE, Walker HR, Oser S. The Underground Exchange of Diabetes Medications and Supplies: Donating, Trading, and Borrowing, Oh My! J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2020 11; 14(6):1000-1009.
Score: 0.170
-
Litchman ML, Walker HR, Ng AH, Wawrzynski SE, Oser SM, Greenwood DA, Gee PM, Lackey M, Oser TK. State of the Science: A Scoping Review and Gap Analysis of Diabetes Online Communities. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2019 05; 13(3):466-492.
Score: 0.161
-
Oser TK, Oser SM, McGinley EL, Stuckey HL. A Novel Approach to Identifying Barriers and Facilitators in Raising a Child With Type 1 Diabetes: Qualitative Analysis of Caregiver Blogs. JMIR Diabetes. 2017 Oct 26; 2(2):e27.
Score: 0.147
-
Curry E, Oser TK, Oser SM. Electronic Health Record Impacts on Family Medicine Teachers: Survey of Third-Year Medical Student Clerkship Preceptors at an Academic Medical Center. Fam Med. 2017 Oct; 49(9):723-729.
Score: 0.146
-
Oser SM, Oser TK, Silvis ML. Evaluation and treatment of biking and running injuries. Prim Care. 2013 Dec; 40(4):969-86, ix.
Score: 0.111
-
Dupenloup P, Guan G, Aleppo G, Bergenstal RM, Hood K, Kruger D, McArthur T, Olson B, Oser S, Oser T, Weinstock RS, Gal RL, Kollman C, Scheinker D. Assessing the Financial Sustainability of a Virtual Clinic Providing Comprehensive Diabetes Care. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2025 May 13; 19322968251340664.
Score: 0.062
-
Weinstock RS, Raghinaru D, Gal RL, Bergenstal RM, Bradshaw A, Cushman T, Kollman C, Kruger D, Johnson ML, McArthur T, Olson BA, Oser SM, Oser TK, Beck RW, Hood K, Aleppo G. Older Adults Benefit From Virtual Support for Continuous Glucose Monitor Use But Require Longer Visits. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2024 Nov 02; 19322968241294250.
Score: 0.060
-
Hood KK, Bergenstal RM, Cushman T, Gal RL, Raghinaru D, Kruger D, Johnson ML, McArthur T, Bradshaw A, Olson BA, Oser SM, Oser TK, Kollman C, Weinstock RS, Beck RW, Aleppo G. Patient-Reported Outcomes Improve with a Virtual Diabetes Care Model that Includes Continuous Glucose Monitoring. Telemed J E Health. 2025 Jan; 31(1):75-84.
Score: 0.059
-
Aleppo G, Gal RL, Raghinaru D, Kruger D, Beck RW, Bergenstal RM, Cushman T, Hood KK, Johnson ML, McArthur T, Bradshaw A, Olson BA, Oser SM, Oser TK, Kollman C, Weinstock RS. Comprehensive Telehealth Model to Support Diabetes Self-Management. JAMA Netw Open. 2023 10 02; 6(10):e2336876.
Score: 0.055
-
Phillip M, Nimri R, Bergenstal RM, Barnard-Kelly K, Danne T, Hovorka R, Kovatchev BP, Messer LH, Parkin CG, Ambler-Osborn L, Amiel SA, Bally L, Beck RW, Biester S, Biester T, Blanchette JE, Bosi E, Boughton CK, Breton MD, Brown SA, Buckingham BA, Cai A, Carlson AL, Castle JR, Choudhary P, Close KL, Cobelli C, Criego AB, Davis E, de Beaufort C, de Bock MI, DeSalvo DJ, DeVries JH, Dovc K, Doyle FJ, Ekhlaspour L, Shvalb NF, Forlenza GP, Gallen G, Garg SK, Gershenoff DC, Gonder-Frederick LA, Haidar A, Hartnell S, Heinemann L, Heller S, Hirsch IB, Hood KK, Isaacs D, Klonoff DC, Kordonouri O, Kowalski A, Laffel L, Lawton J, Lal RA, Leelarathna L, Maahs DM, Murphy HR, N?rgaard K, O'Neal D, Oser S, Oser T, Renard E, Riddell MC, Rodbard D, Russell SJ, Schatz DA, Shah VN, Sherr JL, Simonson GD, Wadwa RP, Ward C, Weinzimer SA, Wilmot EG, Battelino T. Consensus Recommendations for the Use of Automated Insulin Delivery Technologies in Clinical Practice. Endocr Rev. 2023 03 04; 44(2):254-280.
Score: 0.053
-
Warman M, Fillippi M, Manning B, Oser T, Nease D, Hall T, Oser S, Carroll J. Continuous glucose monitoring for primary care patients with diabetes: Barriers, facilitators, & resources to support access. Ann Fam Med. 2022 04 01; (20 Suppl 1).
Score: 0.050
-
Stuckey HL, Oser SM, Miller EL, Oser TK, Peyrot M, Sharma A. "Not Today, Diabetes": Using Blog Analysis to Understand Emotional Interactions and Support Among People With Type 1 Diabetes. Front Clin Diabetes Healthc. 2020; 1:613569.
Score: 0.046
-
Gal RL, Cohen NJ, Kruger D, Beck RW, Bergenstal RM, Calhoun P, Cushman T, Haban A, Hood K, Johnson ML, McArthur T, Olson BA, Weinstock RS, Oser SM, Oser TK, Bugielski B, Strayer H, Aleppo G. Diabetes Telehealth Solutions: Improving Self-Management Through Remote Initiation of Continuous Glucose Monitoring. J Endocr Soc. 2020 Sep 01; 4(9):bvaa076.
Score: 0.044
|
Connection Strength
The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.
Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.
|