 Connection
Nicholas Cost to Prospective Studies
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Nicholas Cost has written about Prospective Studies.
|
|
| |
Connection Strength |
|
 |
|
 |
| |
0.346 |
|
|
|
-
Hecht SL, Quach A, Gao D, Brazell A, Beltran G, Holbrook S, Gore L, Iguchi N, Malykhina A, Wilcox D, Cost NG. A prospective survey study of lower urinary tract dysfunction in childhood cancer survivors after vincristine and/or doxorubicin chemotherapy. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2021 10; 68(10):e29226.
Score: 0.087
-
Cost NG, Caldwell BT, Adibi M, Raj GV, Sagalowsky AI, Margulis V. Do Referral Patterns in Adolescents and Young Adults with Testicular Cancer Impact Oncologic Outcomes? J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol. 2016 09; 5(3):248-53.
Score: 0.060
-
Cost NG, Noh PH, Devarajan P, Ivancic V, Reddy PP, Minevich E, Bennett M, Haffner C, Schulte M, DeFoor WR. Urinary NGAL levels correlate with differential renal function in patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction undergoing pyeloplasty. J Urol. 2013 Oct; 190(4 Suppl):1462-7.
Score: 0.050
-
Snodgrass WT, Bush N, Cost N. Tubularized incised plate hypospadias repair for distal hypospadias. J Pediatr Urol. 2010 Aug; 6(4):408-13.
Score: 0.041
-
Snodgrass W, Barber T, Cost N. Detrusor compliance changes after bladder neck sling without augmentation in children with neurogenic urinary incontinence. J Urol. 2010 Jun; 183(6):2361-6.
Score: 0.040
-
Snodgrass WT, Bush N, Cost N. Algorithm for comprehensive approach to hypospadias reoperation using 3 techniques. J Urol. 2009 Dec; 182(6):2885-91.
Score: 0.039
-
Geller JI, Cost NG, Chi YY, Tornwall B, Cajaiba M, Perlman EJ, Kim Y, Mullen EA, Glick RD, Khanna G, Daw NC, Ehrlich P, Fernandez CV, Dome JS. A prospective study of pediatric and adolescent renal cell carcinoma: A report from the Children's Oncology Group AREN0321 study. Cancer. 2020 12 01; 126(23):5156-5164.
Score: 0.020
-
Snodgrass W, Cost N, Nakonezny PA, Bush N. Analysis of risk factors for glans dehiscence after tubularized incised plate hypospadias repair. J Urol. 2011 May; 185(5):1845-9.
Score: 0.011
|
Connection Strength
The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.
Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.
|