 Connection
Chad Pearson to Chromosome Segregation
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Chad Pearson has written about Chromosome Segregation.
|
|
| |
Connection Strength |
|
 |
|
 |
| |
0.489 |
|
|
|
-
Sankaran DG, Stemm-Wolf AJ, McCurdy BL, Hariharan B, Pearson CG. A semi-automated machine learning-aided approach to quantitative analysis of centrosomes and microtubule organization. J Cell Sci. 2020 07 30; 133(14).
Score: 0.177
-
Ganapathi Sankaran D, Stemm-Wolf AJ, Pearson CG. CEP135 isoform dysregulation promotes centrosome amplification in breast cancer cells. Mol Biol Cell. 2019 05 01; 30(10):1230-1244.
Score: 0.160
-
Pearson CG, Gardner MK, Paliulis LV, Salmon ED, Odde DJ, Bloom K. Measuring nanometer scale gradients in spindle microtubule dynamics using model convolution microscopy. Mol Biol Cell. 2006 Sep; 17(9):4069-79.
Score: 0.067
-
Jones MH, Huneycutt BJ, Pearson CG, Zhang C, Morgan G, Shokat K, Bloom K, Winey M. Chemical genetics reveals a role for Mps1 kinase in kinetochore attachment during mitosis. Curr Biol. 2005 Jan 26; 15(2):160-5.
Score: 0.060
-
Sprague BL, Pearson CG, Maddox PS, Bloom KS, Salmon ED, Odde DJ. Mechanisms of microtubule-based kinetochore positioning in the yeast metaphase spindle. Biophys J. 2003 Jun; 84(6):3529-46.
Score: 0.013
-
Kosco KA, Pearson CG, Maddox PS, Wang PJ, Adams IR, Salmon ED, Bloom K, Huffaker TC. Control of microtubule dynamics by Stu2p is essential for spindle orientation and metaphase chromosome alignment in yeast. Mol Biol Cell. 2001 Sep; 12(9):2870-80.
Score: 0.012
|
Connection Strength
The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.
Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.
|