 Connection
Catherine Musselman to Protein Processing, Post-Translational
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Catherine Musselman has written about Protein Processing, Post-Translational.
|
|
| |
Connection Strength |
|
 |
|
 |
| |
1.815 |
|
|
|
-
Weaver TM, Liu J, Connelly KE, Coble C, Varzavand K, Dykhuizen EC, Musselman CA. The EZH2 SANT1 domain is a histone reader providing sensitivity to the modification state of the H4 tail. Sci Rep. 2019 01 30; 9(1):987.
Score: 0.470
-
Musselman CA, Khorasanizadeh S, Kutateladze TG. Towards understanding methyllysine readout. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2014 Aug; 1839(8):686-93.
Score: 0.337
-
Keogh MC, Almouzni G, Andrews AJ, Armache KJ, Arrowsmith CH, Baek SH, Bedford MT, Bernstein E, Côté J, David Y, Denu JM, Fierz B, Garcia BA, Glass KC, Gozani O, Helin K, Henikoff S, Jensen ON, Josefowicz SZ, Kelleher NL, Kutateladze TG, Lindner HH, Lu C, Luger K, Mallick P, Musselman CA, Muir TW, Pa?a-Tolic L, Schneider R, Shi X, Shi Y, Sidoli S, Smith LM, Tyler JK, Wolberger C, Workman JL, Strahl BD, Young NL. A needed nomenclature for nucleosomes. Mol Cell. 2025 Oct 02; 85(19):3554-3561.
Score: 0.187
-
Marunde MR, Fuchs HA, Burg JM, Popova IK, Vaidya A, Hall NW, Weinzapfel EN, Meiners MJ, Watson R, Gillespie ZB, Taylor HF, Mukhsinova L, Onuoha UC, Howard SA, Novitzky K, McAnarney ET, Krajewski K, Cowles MW, Cheek MA, Sun ZW, Venters BJ, Keogh MC, Musselman CA. Nucleosome conformation dictates the histone code. Elife. 2024 Feb 06; 13.
Score: 0.166
-
Musselman CA, Kutateladze TG. The PHD finger of Spp1 mediates histone modification cross-talk. Biochem J. 2019 08 28; 476(16):2351-2354.
Score: 0.122
-
Musselman CA, Kutateladze TG. Strategies for Generating Modified Nucleosomes: Applications within Structural Biology Studies. ACS Chem Biol. 2019 04 19; 14(4):579-586.
Score: 0.118
-
Musselman CA, Kutateladze TG. Preparation, Biochemical Analysis, and Structure Determination of Methyllysine Readers. Methods Enzymol. 2016; 573:345-62.
Score: 0.095
-
Musselman CA, Ramírez J, Sims JK, Mansfield RE, Oliver SS, Denu JM, Mackay JP, Wade PA, Hagman J, Kutateladze TG. Bivalent recognition of nucleosomes by the tandem PHD fingers of the CHD4 ATPase is required for CHD4-mediated repression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Jan 17; 109(3):787-92.
Score: 0.072
-
Musselman CA, Kutateladze TG. Handpicking epigenetic marks with PHD fingers. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011 Nov; 39(21):9061-71.
Score: 0.070
-
Garske AL, Oliver SS, Wagner EK, Musselman CA, LeRoy G, Garcia BA, Kutateladze TG, Denu JM. Combinatorial profiling of chromatin binding modules reveals multisite discrimination. Nat Chem Biol. 2010 Apr; 6(4):283-90.
Score: 0.063
-
Marunde MR, Popova IK, Hall NW, Vaidya A, Bone JR, Boone BA, Brown PJ, Ezell RJ, Firestone TM, Fuchs HA, Gibson E, Gillespie ZB, Gloor SL, Hickman AR, Howard SA, Husby NL, Hsiung VT, Johnstone AL, Khan LF, Krajewski K, Lee AS, McAnarney ET, Maier KE, Maryanski DN, McCuiston JL, Noll KE, Novitzky K, Patteson EF, Rodriguez KL, Sanchez JC, Schachner LF, Smith CE, Sun L, Taylor HF, Watson R, Willis HE, Musselman CA, Venters BJ, Cheek MA, Meiners MJ, Sun ZW, Kelleher NL, Cowles MW, Weinzapfel EN, Keogh MC, Burg JM. Nucleosome context regulates chromatin reader preference. Nucleic Acids Res. 2025 Oct 28; 53(20).
Score: 0.047
-
Tencer AH, Cox KL, Di L, Bridgers JB, Lyu J, Wang X, Sims JK, Weaver TM, Allen HF, Zhang Y, Gatchalian J, Darcy MA, Gibson MD, Ikebe J, Li W, Wade PA, Hayes JJ, Strahl BD, Kono H, Poirier MG, Musselman CA, Kutateladze TG. Covalent Modifications of Histone H3K9 Promote Binding of CHD3. Cell Rep. 2017 Oct 10; 21(2):455-466.
Score: 0.027
-
Allen HF, Daze KD, Shimbo T, Lai A, Musselman CA, Sims JK, Wade PA, Hof F, Kutateladze TG. Inhibition of histone binding by supramolecular hosts. Biochem J. 2014 May 01; 459(3):505-12.
Score: 0.021
-
Oliver SS, Musselman CA, Srinivasan R, Svaren JP, Kutateladze TG, Denu JM. Multivalent recognition of histone tails by the PHD fingers of CHD5. Biochemistry. 2012 Aug 21; 51(33):6534-44.
Score: 0.019
|
Connection Strength
The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.
Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.
|