 Connection
Marie Banich to Individuality
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Marie Banich has written about Individuality.
|
|
| |
Connection Strength |
|
 |
|
 |
| |
6.629 |
|
|
|
-
Smith LL, Friedman NP, Luciana M, Banich MT. Functional connectivity patterns of the fronto-parietal and cingulo-opercular networks demonstrate distinct associations with individual differences in cognitive control during early adolescence. Neuroimage. 2025 Oct 15; 320:121454.
Score: 0.858
-
DeRosa J, Smolker HR, Kim H, Groff B, Lewis-Peacock J, Banich MT. Multivariate neural markers of individual differences in thought control difficulties. Neuroimage Clin. 2025; 47:103826.
Score: 0.843
-
Carlson KW, Smolker HR, Smith LL, Snyder HR, Hankin BL, Banich MT. Individual differences in intolerance of uncertainty is primarily linked to the structure of inferior frontal regions. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2025 Jun; 25(3):727-743.
Score: 0.822
-
Leopold DR, Kim H, Carlson KW, Rowe MA, Groff BR, Major MP, Willcutt EG, Cutting LE, Banich MT. Stimulus shapes strategy: Effects of stimulus characteristics and individual differences in academic achievement on the neural mechanisms engaged during the N-back task. Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2024 04; 66:101372.
Score: 0.775
-
Smith LL, Snyder HR, Hankin BL, Banich MT. Composite Measures of Brain Activation Predict Individual Differences in Behavioral Stroop Interference. J Cogn Neurosci. 2023 05 01; 35(5):781-801.
Score: 0.728
-
Reineberg AE, Banich MT. Functional connectivity at rest is sensitive to individual differences in executive function: A network analysis. Hum Brain Mapp. 2016 08; 37(8):2959-75.
Score: 0.449
-
Reineberg AE, Andrews-Hanna JR, Depue BE, Friedman NP, Banich MT. Resting-state networks predict individual differences in common and specific aspects of executive function. Neuroimage. 2015 Jan 01; 104:69-78.
Score: 0.402
-
de la Vega A, Brown MS, Snyder HR, Singel D, Munakata Y, Banich MT. Individual differences in the balance of GABA to glutamate in pFC predict the ability to select among competing options. J Cogn Neurosci. 2014 Nov; 26(11):2490-502.
Score: 0.389
-
Banich MT, De La Vega A, Andrews-Hanna JR, Mackiewicz Seghete K, Du Y, Claus ED. Developmental trends and individual differences in brain systems involved in intertemporal choice during adolescence. Psychol Addict Behav. 2013 Jun; 27(2):416-30.
Score: 0.363
-
Martinez-Lincoln A, Leopold DR, Groff BR, Yeo DJ, Willcutt EG, Cutting LE, Banich MT, Price GR. Individual differences in the activity of executive function brain regions during number comparison. Behav Brain Res. 2025 Oct 02; 494:115740.
Score: 0.212
-
Anokhin AP, Luciana M, Banich M, Barch D, Bjork JM, Gonzalez MR, Gonzalez R, Haist F, Jacobus J, Lisdahl K, McGlade E, McCandliss B, Nagel B, Nixon SJ, Tapert S, Kennedy JT, Thompson W. Age-related changes and longitudinal stability of individual differences in ABCD Neurocognition measures. Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2022 04; 54:101078.
Score: 0.167
-
Banich MT, Smith LL, Smolker HR, Hankin BL, Silton RL, Heller W, Snyder HR. Common and specific dimensions of internalizing disorders are characterized by unique patterns of brain activity on a task of emotional cognitive control. Int J Psychophysiol. 2020 05; 151:80-93.
Score: 0.145
-
Smith LL, Banich MT, Friedman NP. Individual differences in mixing costs relate to general executive functioning. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2019 Apr; 45(4):606-613.
Score: 0.130
-
Kaiser RH, Andrews-Hanna JR, Spielberg JM, Warren SL, Sutton BP, Miller GA, Heller W, Banich MT. Distracted and down: neural mechanisms of affective interference in subclinical depression. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2015 May; 10(5):654-63.
Score: 0.099
-
Smolker HR, Depue BE, Reineberg AE, Orr JM, Banich MT. Individual differences in regional prefrontal gray matter morphometry and fractional anisotropy are associated with different constructs of executive function. Brain Struct Funct. 2015; 220(3):1291-306.
Score: 0.096
-
Reineberg AE, Banich MT, Wager TD, Friedman NP. Context-specific activations are a hallmark of the neural basis of individual differences in general executive function. Neuroimage. 2022 04 01; 249:118845.
Score: 0.041
-
Wang K, Leopold DR, Banich MT, Reineberg AE, Willcutt EG, Cutting LE, Del Tufo SN, Thompson LA, Opfer J, Kanayet FJ, Lu ZL, Petrill SA. Characterizing and decomposing the neural correlates of individual differences in reading ability among adolescents with task-based fMRI. Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2019 06; 37:100647.
Score: 0.034
-
Belger A, Banich MT. Costs and benefits of integrating information between the cerebral hemispheres: a computational perspective. Neuropsychology. 1998 Jul; 12(3):380-98.
Score: 0.033
-
Banich MT, Elledge VC, Stolar N. Variations in lateralized processing among right-handers: effects on patterns of cognitive performance. Cortex. 1992 Jun; 28(2):273-88.
Score: 0.021
-
Steinberg L, Albert D, Cauffman E, Banich M, Graham S, Woolard J. Age differences in sensation seeking and impulsivity as indexed by behavior and self-report: evidence for a dual systems model. Dev Psychol. 2008 Nov; 44(6):1764-78.
Score: 0.017
-
Levy J, Heller W, Banich MT, Burton LA. Are variations among right-handed individuals in perceptual asymmetries caused by characteristic arousal differences between hemispheres? J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1983 Jun; 9(3):329-59.
Score: 0.003
|
Connection Strength
The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.
Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.
|