Connection
Andrew Lac to Surveys and Questionnaires
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Andrew Lac has written about Surveys and Questionnaires.
|
|
Connection Strength |
|
 |
|
 |
|
1.350 |
|
|
|
-
Lac A, Donaldson CD. Comparing the predictive validity of the four-factor and five-factor (bifactor) measurement structures of the drinking motives questionnaire. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2017 12 01; 181:108-115.
Score: 0.234
-
Lac A, Donaldson CD. Higher-Order and Bifactor Models of the Drinking Motives Questionnaire. Assessment. 2017 Mar; 24(2):222-231.
Score: 0.215
-
Kisley MA, Beblo T, Lac A. Emotion Acceptance Questionnaire (EAQ): Factor Analysis and Psychometric Evaluation. J Pers Assess. 2025 Jul-Aug; 107(4):516-529.
Score: 0.097
-
Lac A, Luk JW. The Alcohol Relief Questionnaire: Development and validation of a multidimensional scale to measure the psychological, interpersonal, sleep, and physical relief effects of drinking. Psychol Assess. 2023 Jun; 35(6):533-545.
Score: 0.086
-
Lac A, Donaldson CD. Sensation seeking versus alcohol use: Evaluating temporal precedence using cross-lagged panel models. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2021 02 01; 219:108430.
Score: 0.073
-
Lac A, Luk JW. Testing the Amotivational Syndrome: Marijuana Use Longitudinally Predicts Lower Self-Efficacy Even After Controlling for Demographics, Personality, and Alcohol and Cigarette Use. Prev Sci. 2018 02; 19(2):117-126.
Score: 0.060
-
Lac A, Brack N. Alcohol expectancies longitudinally predict drinking and the alcohol myopia effects of relief, self-inflation, and excess. Addict Behav. 2018 Feb; 77:172-179.
Score: 0.059
-
Lac A, Handren L, Crano WD. Conceptualizing and Measuring Weekend versus Weekday Alcohol Use: Item Response Theory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis. Prev Sci. 2016 10; 17(7):872-81.
Score: 0.055
-
Lac A, Donaldson CD. Alcohol attitudes, motives, norms, and personality traits longitudinally classify nondrinkers, moderate drinkers, and binge drinkers using discriminant function analysis. Addict Behav. 2016 10; 61:91-8.
Score: 0.053
-
Kenney SR, Lac A, Hummer JF, LaBrie JW. Development and validation of the Hookup Motives Questionnaire (HMQ). Psychol Assess. 2014 Dec; 26(4):1127-37.
Score: 0.047
-
Lac A, Crano WD, Berger DE, Alvaro EM. Attachment theory and theory of planned behavior: an integrative model predicting underage drinking. Dev Psychol. 2013 Aug; 49(8):1579-90.
Score: 0.042
-
LaBrie JW, Hummer JF, Pedersen ER, Lac A, Chithambo T. Measuring college students' motives behind prepartying drinking: development and validation of the prepartying motivations inventory. Addict Behav. 2012 Aug; 37(8):962-9.
Score: 0.040
-
Grant SP, LaBrie JW, Hummer JF, Lac A. Underestimations of blood alcohol concentration predict event-specific negative consequences. Subst Use Misuse. 2011; 46(10):1309-17.
Score: 0.038
-
Grant S, LaBrie JW, Hummer JF, Lac A. How drunk am I? Misperceiving one's level of intoxication in the college drinking environment. Psychol Addict Behav. 2012 Mar; 26(1):51-8.
Score: 0.038
-
LaBrie JW, Hummer JF, Lac A. Comparing injunctive marijuana use norms of salient reference groups among college student marijuana users and nonusers. Addict Behav. 2011 Jul; 36(7):717-20.
Score: 0.037
-
Labrie JW, Migliuri S, Kenney SR, Lac A. Family history of alcohol abuse associated with problematic drinking among college students. Addict Behav. 2010 Jul; 35(7):721-5.
Score: 0.035
-
LaBrie JW, Kenney SR, Lac A. The use of protective behavioral strategies is related to reduced risk in heavy drinking college students with poorer mental and physical health. J Drug Educ. 2010; 40(4):361-78.
Score: 0.034
-
Lac A, Alvaro EM, Crano WD, Siegel JT. Pathways from parental knowledge and warmth to adolescent marijuana use: an extension to the theory of planned behavior. Prev Sci. 2009 Mar; 10(1):22-32.
Score: 0.032
-
Napper LE, Kenney SR, Lac A, Lewis LJ, LaBrie JW. A cross-lagged panel model examining protective behavioral strategies: are types of strategies differentially related to alcohol use and consequences? Addict Behav. 2014 Feb; 39(2):480-6.
Score: 0.011
-
Labrie JW, Hummer JF, Ghaidarov TM, Lac A, Kenney SR. Hooking up in the college context: the event-level effects of alcohol use and partner familiarity on hookup behaviors and contentment. J Sex Res. 2014; 51(1):62-73.
Score: 0.010
-
LaBrie JW, Hummer J, Kenney S, Lac A, Pedersen E. Identifying factors that increase the likelihood for alcohol-induced blackouts in the prepartying context. Subst Use Misuse. 2011; 46(8):992-1002.
Score: 0.009
-
Labrie JW, Lac A, Kenney SR, Mirza T. Protective behavioral strategies mediate the effect of drinking motives on alcohol use among heavy drinking college students: gender and race differences. Addict Behav. 2011 Apr; 36(4):354-61.
Score: 0.009
-
LaBrie JW, Huchting KK, Lac A, Tawalbeh S, Thompson AD, Larimer ME. Preventing risky drinking in first-year college women: further validation of a female-specific motivational-enhancement group intervention. J Stud Alcohol Drugs Suppl. 2009 Jul; (16):77-85.
Score: 0.008
-
Labrie JW, Cail J, Hummer JF, Lac A, Neighbors C. What men want: the role of reflective opposite-sex normative preferences in alcohol use among college women. Psychol Addict Behav. 2009 Mar; 23(1):157-62.
Score: 0.008
-
Siegel JT, Alvaro EM, Crano WD, Skenderian J, Lac A, Patel N. Influencing inhalant intentions by changing socio-personal expectations. Prev Sci. 2008 Sep; 9(3):153-65.
Score: 0.008
-
Siegel JT, Alvaro EM, Lac A, Crano WD, Dominick A. Intentions of becoming a living organ donor among Hispanics: a theory-based approach exploring differences between living and nonliving organ donation. J Health Commun. 2008 Jan-Feb; 13(1):80-99.
Score: 0.007
-
Huchting K, Lac A, LaBrie JW. An application of the Theory of Planned Behavior to sorority alcohol consumption. Addict Behav. 2008 Apr; 33(4):538-51.
Score: 0.007
|
Connection Strength
The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.
Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.
|