 Connection
Ryan St Laurent to Moths
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Ryan St Laurent has written about Moths.
|
|
| |
Connection Strength |
|
 |
|
 |
| |
1.982 |
|
|
|
-
St Laurent RA, Carvalho APS, Earl C, Kawahara AY. Food Plant Shifts Drive the Diversification of Sack-Bearer Moths. Am Nat. 2021 11; 198(5):E170-E184.
Score: 0.665
-
Prada-Lara L, Laurent RAS, Weller S, Fagua G. Nystaleinae moths (Lepidoptera: Notodontidae): A morphological review of the subfamily. Zootaxa. 2025 Apr 23; 5622(1):1-67.
Score: 0.427
-
Rubin JJ, Campbell CJ, Carvalho APS, St Laurent RA, Crespo GI, Pierson TL, Guralnick R, Kawahara AY. Strong bat predation and weak environmental constraints predict longer moth tails. Proc Biol Sci. 2025 May; 292(2046):20242824.
Score: 0.214
-
Sondhi Y, Messcher RL, Bellantuono AJ, Storer CG, Cinel SD, Godfrey RK, Mongue AJ, Weng YM, Glass D, St Laurent RA, Hamilton CA, Earl C, Brislawn CJ, Kitching IJ, Bybee SM, Theobald JC, Kawahara AY. Day-night gene expression reveals circadian gene disco as a candidate for diel-niche evolution in moths. Proc Biol Sci. 2024 08; 291(2029):20240591.
Score: 0.204
-
Li X, Hamilton CA, St Laurent R, Ballesteros-Mejia L, Markee A, Haxaire J, Rougerie R, Kitching IJ, Kawahara AY. A diversification relay race from Caribbean-Mesoamerica to the Andes: historical biogeography of Xylophanes hawkmoths. Proc Biol Sci. 2022 02 09; 289(1968):20212435.
Score: 0.171
-
Li X, St Laurent R, Earl C, Doorenweerd C, van Nieukerken EJ, Davis DR, Johns CA, Kawakita A, Kobayashi S, Zwick A, Lopez-Vaamonde C, Ohshima I, Kawahara AY. Phylogeny of gracillariid leaf-mining moths: evolution of larval behaviour inferred from phylogenomic and Sanger data. Cladistics. 2022 06; 38(3):277-300.
Score: 0.168
-
Kawahara AY, Breinholt JW, Espeland M, Storer C, Plotkin D, Dexter KM, Toussaint EFA, St Laurent RA, Brehm G, Vargas S, Forero D, Pierce NE, Lohman DJ. Phylogenetics of moth-like butterflies (Papilionoidea: Hedylidae) based on a new 13-locus target capture probe set. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2018 10; 127:600-605.
Score: 0.133
|
Connection Strength
The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.
Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.
|