 Connection
Tessa Genders to Sensitivity and Specificity
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Tessa Genders has written about Sensitivity and Specificity.
|
|
| |
Connection Strength |
|
 |
|
 |
| |
0.308 |
|
|
|
-
Genders TS, Petersen SE, Pugliese F, Dastidar AG, Fleischmann KE, Nieman K, Hunink MG. The optimal imaging strategy for patients with stable chest pain: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2015 Apr 07; 162(7):474-84.
Score: 0.092
-
Genders TS, Spronk S, Stijnen T, Steyerberg EW, Lesaffre E, Hunink MG. Methods for calculating sensitivity and specificity of clustered data: a tutorial. Radiology. 2012 Dec; 265(3):910-6.
Score: 0.078
-
Genders TS, Meijboom WB, Meijs MF, Schuijf JD, Mollet NR, Weustink AC, Pugliese F, Bax JJ, Cramer MJ, Krestin GP, de Feyter PJ, Hunink MG. CT coronary angiography in patients suspected of having coronary artery disease: decision making from various perspectives in the face of uncertainty. Radiology. 2009 Dec; 253(3):734-44.
Score: 0.063
-
Dedic A, Genders TS, Nieman K, Hunink MG. Imaging strategies for acute chest pain in the emergency department. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013 Jan; 200(1):W26-38.
Score: 0.020
-
Neefjes LA, Rossi A, Genders TS, Nieman K, Papadopoulou SL, Dharampal AS, Schultz CJ, Weustink AC, Dijkshoorn ML, Ten Kate GJ, Dedic A, van Straten M, Cademartiri F, Hunink MG, Krestin GP, de Feyter PJ, Mollet NR. Diagnostic accuracy of 128-slice dual-source CT coronary angiography: a randomized comparison of different acquisition protocols. Eur Radiol. 2013 Mar; 23(3):614-22.
Score: 0.019
-
de Jong MC, Genders TS, van Geuns RJ, Moelker A, Hunink MG. Diagnostic performance of stress myocardial perfusion imaging for coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Radiol. 2012 Sep; 22(9):1881-95.
Score: 0.019
-
Tholen AT, de Mony? C, Genders TS, Buskens E, Dippel DW, van der Lugt A, Hunink MG. Suspected carotid artery stenosis: cost-effectiveness of CT angiography in work-up of patients with recent TIA or minor ischemic stroke. Radiology. 2010 Aug; 256(2):585-97.
Score: 0.017
|
Connection Strength
The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.
Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.
|