 Connection
Ihab Kamel to Liver Diseases
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Ihab Kamel has written about Liver Diseases.
|
|
| |
Connection Strength |
|
 |
|
 |
| |
2.752 |
|
|
|
-
Khoshpouri P, Hazhirkarzar B, Ameli S, Pandey A, Ghadimi M, Rezvani Habibabadi R, Aliyari Ghasabeh M, Pandey P, Shaghaghi M, Kamel IR. Quantitative spleen and liver volume changes predict survival of patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis. Clin Radiol. 2019 Sep; 74(9):734.e13-734.e20.
Score: 0.502
-
Pozzessere C, Porter KK, Kamel IR. Surveillance liver MRI for monitoring patients with known or suspected chronic liver disease. Clin Radiol. 2017 Jan; 72(1):93.e7-93.e13.
Score: 0.415
-
Bonekamp S, Jolepalem P, Lazo M, Gulsun MA, Kiraly AP, Kamel IR. Hepatocellular carcinoma: response to TACE assessed with semiautomated volumetric and functional analysis of diffusion-weighted and contrast-enhanced MR imaging data. Radiology. 2011 Sep; 260(3):752-61.
Score: 0.290
-
Kamel IR, Liapi E, Fishman EK. Incidental nonneoplastic hypervascular lesions in the noncirrhotic liver: diagnosis with 16-MDCT and 3D CT angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006 Sep; 187(3):682-7.
Score: 0.207
-
Kamel IR, Liapi E, Fishman EK. Liver and biliary system: evaluation by multidetector CT. Radiol Clin North Am. 2005 Nov; 43(6):977-97, vii.
Score: 0.195
-
Kamel IR, Lawler LP, Fishman EK. Comprehensive analysis of hypervascular liver lesions using 16-MDCT and advanced image processing. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004 Aug; 183(2):443-52.
Score: 0.179
-
Arif-Tiwari H, Porter KK, Kamel IR, Bashir MR, Fung A, Kaplan DE, McGuire BM, Russo GK, Smith EN, Solnes LB, Thakrar KH, Vij A, Wahab SA, Wardrop RM, Zaheer A, Carucci LR. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Abnormal Liver Function Tests. J Am Coll Radiol. 2023 11; 20(11S):S302-S314.
Score: 0.170
-
Towbin AJ, Ye W, Huang S, Karmazyn BW, Molleston JP, Masand P, Leung DH, Chang S, Narkewicz MR, Alazraki AL, Freeman AJ, Otto RK, Green N, Kamel IR, Karnsakul WW, Magee JC, Tkach J, Palermo JJ. Prospective study of quantitative liver MRI in cystic fibrosis: feasibility and comparison to PUSH cohort ultrasound. Pediatr Radiol. 2023 10; 53(11):2210-2220.
Score: 0.167
-
Kamel IR, Choti MA, Horton KM, Braga HJ, Birnbaum BA, Fishman EK, Thompson RE, Bluemke DA. Surgically staged focal liver lesions: accuracy and reproducibility of dual-phase helical CT for detection and characterization. Radiology. 2003 Jun; 227(3):752-7.
Score: 0.165
-
Meng X, Chen X, Shen Y, Hu X, Tang H, Hu D, Li Z, Kamel IR. Proton-density fat fraction measurement: A viable quantitative biomarker for differentiating adrenal adenomas from nonadenomas. Eur J Radiol. 2017 Jan; 86:112-118.
Score: 0.105
-
Wagner D, Büttner S, Kim Y, Gani F, Xu L, Margonis GA, Amini N, Kamel IR, Pawlik TM. Clinical and morphometric parameters of frailty for prediction of mortality following hepatopancreaticobiliary surgery in the elderly. Br J Surg. 2016 Jan; 103(2):e83-92.
Score: 0.098
-
Spolverato G, Anders R, Kamel I, Pawlik TM. Segmental atrophy of the liver: an uncommon and often unrecognized pseudotumor. Dig Dis Sci. 2014 Dec; 59(12):3122-5.
Score: 0.088
-
Bonekamp D, Bonekamp S, Geiger B, Kamel IR. An elevated arterial enhancement fraction is associated with clinical and imaging indices of liver fibrosis and cirrhosis. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2012 Nov-Dec; 36(6):681-9.
Score: 0.079
-
Aziz H, Hamad A, Afyouni S, Kamel IR, Pawlik TM. Management of Mucinous Cystic Neoplasms of the Liver. J Gastrointest Surg. 2023 09; 27(9):1963-1970.
Score: 0.041
-
Horowitz JM, Kamel IR, Arif-Tiwari H, Asrani SK, Hindman NM, Kaur H, McNamara MM, Noto RB, Qayyum A, Lalani T. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Chronic Liver Disease. J Am Coll Radiol. 2017 May; 14(5S):S103-S117.
Score: 0.027
-
Margonis GA, Amini N, Buettner S, Ghasebeh MA, Besharati S, Kim Y, Gani F, Sobhani F, Samaha M, Kamel IR, Pawlik TM. Impact of Perioperative Phosphorus and Glucose Levels on Liver Regeneration and Long-term Outcomes after Major Liver Resection. J Gastrointest Surg. 2016 07; 20(7):1305-16.
Score: 0.025
|
Connection Strength
The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.
Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.
|