 Connection
David Huber to Attention
This is a "connection" page, showing publications David Huber has written about Attention.
|
|
| |
Connection Strength |
|
 |
|
 |
| |
3.102 |
|
|
|
-
Junker M, Huber D. Banishing "Attention" from the study of temporal attention. Behav Brain Sci. 2025 Nov 26; 48:e144.
Score: 0.716
-
Huber DE. Using continual flash suppression to investigate cognitive aftereffects. Conscious Cogn. 2015 Sep; 35:30-2.
Score: 0.345
-
Rieth CA, Huber DE. Implicit learning of spatiotemporal contingencies in spatial cueing. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2013 Aug; 39(4):1165-80.
Score: 0.291
-
Davelaar EJ, Tian X, Weidemann CT, Huber DE. A habituation account of change detection in same/different judgments. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2011 Dec; 11(4):608-26.
Score: 0.272
-
Rieth CA, Huber DE. Priming and habituation for faces: Individual differences and inversion effects. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2010 Jun; 36(3):596-618.
Score: 0.245
-
Huber DE. Immediate priming and cognitive aftereffects. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2008 May; 137(2):324-47.
Score: 0.212
-
Jang Y, Huber DE. Context retrieval and context change in free recall: recalling from long-term memory drives list isolation. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2008 Jan; 34(1):112-27.
Score: 0.207
-
Sadil P, Cowell RA, Huber DE. A modeling framework for determining modulation of neural-level tuning from non-invasive human fMRI data. Commun Biol. 2022 11 14; 5(1):1244.
Score: 0.145
-
Huber DE, Shiffrin RM, Lyle KB, Quach R. Mechanisms of source confusion and discounting in short-term priming 2: effects of prime similarity and target duration. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2002 Nov; 28(6):1120-36.
Score: 0.145
-
Huber DE, Shiffrin RM, Quach R, Lyle KB. Mechanisms of source confusion and discounting in short-term priming: 1. Effects of prime duration and prime recognition. Mem Cognit. 2002 Jul; 30(5):745-57.
Score: 0.141
-
Rusconi P, Huber DE. The perceptual wink model of non-switching attentional blink tasks. Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Oct; 25(5):1717-1739.
Score: 0.109
-
Potter KW, Donkin C, Huber DE. The elimination of positive priming with increasing prime duration reflects a transition from perceptual fluency to disfluency rather than bias against primed words. Cogn Psychol. 2018 03; 101:1-28.
Score: 0.103
-
Huber DE, Clark TF, Curran T, Winkielman P. Effects of repetition priming on recognition memory: testing a perceptual fluency-disfluency model. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2008 Nov; 34(6):1305-24.
Score: 0.055
-
Weidemann CT, Huber DE, Shiffrin RM. Prime diagnosticity in short-term repetition priming: is primed evidence discounted, even when it reliably indicates the correct answer? J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2008 Mar; 34(2):257-81.
Score: 0.052
-
Weidemann CT, Huber DE, Shiffrin RM. Confusion and compensation in visual perception: effects of spatiotemporal proximity and selective attention. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2005 Feb; 31(1):40-61.
Score: 0.042
-
Shiffrin RM, Huber DE, Marinelli K. Effects of category length and strength on familiarity in recognition. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1995 Mar; 21(2):267-87.
Score: 0.021
|
Connection Strength
The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.
Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.
|