 Connection
David Huber to Adult
This is a "connection" page, showing publications David Huber has written about Adult.
|
|
| |
Connection Strength |
|
 |
|
 |
| |
0.311 |
|
|
|
-
Wessel JR, Huber DE. Frontal cortex tracks surprise separately for different sensory modalities but engages a common inhibitory control mechanism. PLoS Comput Biol. 2019 07; 15(7):e1006927.
Score: 0.038
-
Hopper WJ, Huber DE. Testing the primary and convergent retrieval model of recall: Recall practice produces faster recall success but also faster recall failure. Mem Cognit. 2019 05; 47(4):816-841.
Score: 0.037
-
Rusconi P, Huber DE. The perceptual wink model of non-switching attentional blink tasks. Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Oct; 25(5):1717-1739.
Score: 0.036
-
Potter KW, Huszar LD, Huber DE. Does inhibition cause forgetting after selective retrieval? A reanalysis and failure to replicate. Cortex. 2018 07; 104:26-45.
Score: 0.034
-
Rieth CA, Huber DE. Comparing different kinds of words and word-word relations to test an habituation model of priming. Cogn Psychol. 2017 06; 95:79-104.
Score: 0.032
-
Hopper WJ, Finklea KM, Winkielman P, Huber DE. Measuring sexual dimorphism with a race-gender face space. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2014 Oct; 40(5):1779-88.
Score: 0.027
-
Tian X, Huber DE. Playing "Duck Duck Goose" with neurons: change detection through connectivity reduction. Psychol Sci. 2013 Jun; 24(6):819-27.
Score: 0.024
-
Rieth CA, Huber DE. Implicit learning of spatiotemporal contingencies in spatial cueing. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2013 Aug; 39(4):1165-80.
Score: 0.024
-
Huber DE, Shiffrin RM, Quach R, Lyle KB. Mechanisms of source confusion and discounting in short-term priming: 1. Effects of prime duration and prime recognition. Mem Cognit. 2002 Jul; 30(5):745-57.
Score: 0.012
-
Sadil P, Potter KW, Huber DE, Cowell RA. Connecting the dots without top-down knowledge: Evidence for rapidly-learned low-level associations that are independent of object identity. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2019 Jun; 148(6):1058-1070.
Score: 0.009
-
Carr EW, Huber DE, Pecher D, Zeelenberg R, Halberstadt J, Winkielman P. The ugliness-in-averageness effect: Tempering the warm glow of familiarity. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2017 Jun; 112(6):787-812.
Score: 0.008
-
Liu J, Li J, Rieth CA, Huber DE, Tian J, Lee K. A dynamic causal modeling analysis of the effective connectivities underlying top-down letter processing. Neuropsychologia. 2011 Apr; 49(5):1177-1186.
Score: 0.005
-
Li J, Liu J, Liang J, Zhang H, Zhao J, Rieth CA, Huber DE, Li W, Shi G, Ai L, Tian J, Lee K. Effective connectivities of cortical regions for top-down face processing: a dynamic causal modeling study. Brain Res. 2010 Jun 22; 1340:40-51.
Score: 0.005
-
Liu J, Li J, Zhang H, Rieth CA, Huber DE, Li W, Lee K, Tian J. Neural correlates of top-down letter processing. Neuropsychologia. 2010 Jan; 48(2):636-41.
Score: 0.005
-
Li J, Liu J, Liang J, Zhang H, Zhao J, Huber DE, Rieth CA, Lee K, Tian J, Shi G. A distributed neural system for top-down face processing. Neurosci Lett. 2009 Feb 13; 451(1):6-10.
Score: 0.005
-
Zhang H, Liu J, Huber DE, Rieth CA, Tian J, Lee K. Detecting faces in pure noise images: a functional MRI study on top-down perception. Neuroreport. 2008 Jan 22; 19(2):229-33.
Score: 0.004
-
Schacher M, Haemmerle B, Woermann FG, Okujava M, Huber D, Grunwald T, Kr?mer G, Jokeit H. Amygdala fMRI lateralizes temporal lobe epilepsy. Neurology. 2006 Jan 10; 66(1):81-7.
Score: 0.004
-
Shiffrin RM, Huber DE, Marinelli K. Effects of category length and strength on familiarity in recognition. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1995 Mar; 21(2):267-87.
Score: 0.002
|
Connection Strength
The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.
Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.
|