Colorado PROFILES, The Colorado Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute (CCTSI)
Keywords
Last Name
Institution

Contact Us
If you have any questions or feedback please contact us.

Connection

David Huber to Models, Psychological

This is a "connection" page, showing publications David Huber has written about Models, Psychological.

 
Connection Strength
 
 
 
2.523
 
  1. Rusconi P, Huber DE. The perceptual wink model of non-switching attentional blink tasks. Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Oct; 25(5):1717-1739.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.557
  2. Rieth CA, Huber DE. Comparing different kinds of words and word-word relations to test an habituation model of priming. Cogn Psychol. 2017 06; 95:79-104.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.505
  3. Jang Y, Wallsten TS, Huber DE. A stochastic detection and retrieval model for the study of metacognition. Psychol Rev. 2012 Jan; 119(1):186-200.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.345
  4. Jang Y, Wixted JT, Huber DE. The diagnosticity of individual data for model selection: comparing signal-detection models of recognition memory. Psychon Bull Rev. 2011 Aug; 18(4):751-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.339
  5. Huber DE, Cowell RA. Theory-driven modeling or model-driven theorizing? Comment on McClelland et al. and Griffiths et al. Trends Cogn Sci. 2010 Aug; 14(8):343-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.314
  6. Huber DE. Computer simulations of the ROUSE model: an analytic simulation technique and a comparison between the error variance-covariance and bootstrap methods for estimating parameter confidence. Behav Res Methods. 2006 Nov; 38(4):557-68.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.244
  7. Hopper WJ, Huber DE. Testing the primary and convergent retrieval model of recall: Recall practice produces faster recall success but also faster recall failure. Mem Cognit. 2019 05; 47(4):816-841.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.145
  8. Tomlinson TD, Huber DE, Rieth CA, Davelaar EJ. An interference account of cue-independent forgetting in the no-think paradigm. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Sep 15; 106(37):15588-93.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.074
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.

Copyright © 2024 The Regents of the University of Colorado, a body corporate. All rights reserved. (Harvard PROFILES RNS software version: 2.11.1)