 Connection
David Huber to Reaction Time
This is a "connection" page, showing publications David Huber has written about Reaction Time.
|
|
| |
Connection Strength |
|
 |
|
 |
| |
1.142 |
|
|
|
-
Jacob LPL, Potter KW, Huber DE. A neural habituation account of the negative compatibility effect. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2021 Dec; 150(12):2567-2590.
Score: 0.148
-
Wessel JR, Huber DE. Frontal cortex tracks surprise separately for different sensory modalities but engages a common inhibitory control mechanism. PLoS Comput Biol. 2019 07; 15(7):e1006927.
Score: 0.130
-
Rusconi P, Huber DE. The perceptual wink model of non-switching attentional blink tasks. Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Oct; 25(5):1717-1739.
Score: 0.123
-
Potter KW, Donkin C, Huber DE. The elimination of positive priming with increasing prime duration reflects a transition from perceptual fluency to disfluency rather than bias against primed words. Cogn Psychol. 2018 03; 101:1-28.
Score: 0.117
-
Davelaar EJ, Tian X, Weidemann CT, Huber DE. A habituation account of change detection in same/different judgments. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2011 Dec; 11(4):608-26.
Score: 0.077
-
Tian X, Poeppel D, Huber DE. TopoToolbox: using sensor topography to calculate psychologically meaningful measures from event-related EEG/MEG. Comput Intell Neurosci. 2011; 2011:674605.
Score: 0.073
-
Rieth CA, Huber DE. Priming and habituation for faces: Individual differences and inversion effects. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2010 Jun; 36(3):596-618.
Score: 0.069
-
Tian X, Huber DE. Testing an associative account of semantic satiation. Cogn Psychol. 2010 Jun; 60(4):267-90.
Score: 0.068
-
Huber DE, Tian X, Curran T, O'Reilly RC, Woroch B. The dynamics of integration and separation: ERP, MEG, and neural network studies of immediate repetition effects. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2008 Dec; 34(6):1389-416.
Score: 0.062
-
Huber DE, Clark TF, Curran T, Winkielman P. Effects of repetition priming on recognition memory: testing a perceptual fluency-disfluency model. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2008 Nov; 34(6):1305-24.
Score: 0.062
-
Huber DE. Immediate priming and cognitive aftereffects. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2008 May; 137(2):324-47.
Score: 0.060
-
Weidemann CT, Huber DE, Shiffrin RM. Prime diagnosticity in short-term repetition priming: is primed evidence discounted, even when it reliably indicates the correct answer? J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2008 Mar; 34(2):257-81.
Score: 0.059
-
Huber DE, Shiffrin RM, Quach R, Lyle KB. Mechanisms of source confusion and discounting in short-term priming: 1. Effects of prime duration and prime recognition. Mem Cognit. 2002 Jul; 30(5):745-57.
Score: 0.040
-
Huber DE, Shiffrin RM, Lyle KB, Ruys KI. Perception and preference in short-term word priming. Psychol Rev. 2001 Jan; 108(1):149-82.
Score: 0.036
-
Pecher D, Boot I, van Dantzig S, Madden CJ, Huber DE, Zeelenberg R. The sound of enemies and friends in the neighborhood. Exp Psychol. 2011; 58(6):454-63.
Score: 0.018
|
Connection Strength
The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.
Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.
|