 Connection
David Huber to Cues
This is a "connection" page, showing publications David Huber has written about Cues.
|
|
| |
Connection Strength |
|
 |
|
 |
| |
2.560 |
|
|
|
-
Hopper WJ, Huber DE. Testing the primary and convergent retrieval model of recall: Recall practice produces faster recall success but also faster recall failure. Mem Cognit. 2019 05; 47(4):816-841.
Score: 0.560
-
Potter KW, Donkin C, Huber DE. The elimination of positive priming with increasing prime duration reflects a transition from perceptual fluency to disfluency rather than bias against primed words. Cogn Psychol. 2018 03; 101:1-28.
Score: 0.508
-
Rieth CA, Huber DE. Implicit learning of spatiotemporal contingencies in spatial cueing. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2013 Aug; 39(4):1165-80.
Score: 0.358
-
Rieth CA, Huber DE. Priming and habituation for faces: Individual differences and inversion effects. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2010 Jun; 36(3):596-618.
Score: 0.302
-
Huber DE, Clark TF, Curran T, Winkielman P. Effects of repetition priming on recognition memory: testing a perceptual fluency-disfluency model. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2008 Nov; 34(6):1305-24.
Score: 0.270
-
Potter KW, Huszar LD, Huber DE. Does inhibition cause forgetting after selective retrieval? A reanalysis and failure to replicate. Cortex. 2018 07; 104:26-45.
Score: 0.130
-
Gupta N, Jang Y, Mednick SC, Huber DE. The road not taken: creative solutions require avoidance of high-frequency responses. Psychol Sci. 2012 Mar; 23(3):288-94.
Score: 0.085
-
Davelaar EJ, Tian X, Weidemann CT, Huber DE. A habituation account of change detection in same/different judgments. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2011 Dec; 11(4):608-26.
Score: 0.084
-
Jang Y, Wallsten TS, Huber DE. A stochastic detection and retrieval model for the study of metacognition. Psychol Rev. 2012 Jan; 119(1):186-200.
Score: 0.083
-
Tian X, Huber DE. Testing an associative account of semantic satiation. Cogn Psychol. 2010 Jun; 60(4):267-90.
Score: 0.074
-
Huber DE. Immediate priming and cognitive aftereffects. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2008 May; 137(2):324-47.
Score: 0.065
-
Smith KA, Huber DE, Vul E. Multiply-constrained semantic search in the Remote Associates Test. Cognition. 2013 Jul; 128(1):64-75.
Score: 0.023
-
Tomlinson TD, Huber DE, Rieth CA, Davelaar EJ. An interference account of cue-independent forgetting in the no-think paradigm. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Sep 15; 106(37):15588-93.
Score: 0.018
|
Connection Strength
The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.
Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.
|