 Connection
David Huber to Humans
This is a "connection" page, showing publications David Huber has written about Humans.
|
|
| |
Connection Strength |
|
 |
|
 |
| |
0.487 |
|
|
|
-
Sadil P, Cowell RA, Huber DE. The push-pull of serial dependence effects: Attraction to the prior response and repulsion from the prior stimulus. Psychon Bull Rev. 2024 Feb; 31(1):259-273.
Score: 0.024
-
Sadil P, Cowell RA, Huber DE. A modeling framework for determining modulation of neural-level tuning from non-invasive human fMRI data. Commun Biol. 2022 11 14; 5(1):1244.
Score: 0.023
-
Huber DE, Cohen AL, Staub A. A 'compensatory selection' effect with standardized tests: Lack of correlation between test scores and success is evidence that test scores are predictive of success. PLoS One. 2022; 17(5):e0265459.
Score: 0.022
-
Aenugu S, Huber DE. Asymmetric Weights and Retrieval Practice in an Autoassociative Neural Network Model of Paired-Associate Learning. Neural Comput. 2021 11 12; 33(12):3351-3360.
Score: 0.022
-
Jacob LPL, Potter KW, Huber DE. A neural habituation account of the negative compatibility effect. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2021 Dec; 150(12):2567-2590.
Score: 0.021
-
Wessel JR, Huber DE. Frontal cortex tracks surprise separately for different sensory modalities but engages a common inhibitory control mechanism. PLoS Comput Biol. 2019 07; 15(7):e1006927.
Score: 0.019
-
Hopper WJ, Huber DE. Testing the primary and convergent retrieval model of recall: Recall practice produces faster recall success but also faster recall failure. Mem Cognit. 2019 05; 47(4):816-841.
Score: 0.018
-
Huber DE, Potter KW, Huszar LD. Less "story" and more "reliability" in cognitive neuroscience. Cortex. 2019 04; 113:347-349.
Score: 0.018
-
Rusconi P, Huber DE. The perceptual wink model of non-switching attentional blink tasks. Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Oct; 25(5):1717-1739.
Score: 0.017
-
Potter KW, Huszar LD, Huber DE. Does inhibition cause forgetting after selective retrieval? A reanalysis and failure to replicate. Cortex. 2018 07; 104:26-45.
Score: 0.017
-
Potter KW, Donkin C, Huber DE. The elimination of positive priming with increasing prime duration reflects a transition from perceptual fluency to disfluency rather than bias against primed words. Cogn Psychol. 2018 03; 101:1-28.
Score: 0.017
-
Rieth CA, Huber DE. Comparing different kinds of words and word-word relations to test an habituation model of priming. Cogn Psychol. 2017 06; 95:79-104.
Score: 0.016
-
Huber DE. Using continual flash suppression to investigate cognitive aftereffects. Conscious Cogn. 2015 Sep; 35:30-2.
Score: 0.014
-
Hopper WJ, Finklea KM, Winkielman P, Huber DE. Measuring sexual dimorphism with a race-gender face space. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2014 Oct; 40(5):1779-88.
Score: 0.013
-
Tian X, Huber DE. Playing "Duck Duck Goose" with neurons: change detection through connectivity reduction. Psychol Sci. 2013 Jun; 24(6):819-27.
Score: 0.012
-
Rieth CA, Huber DE. Implicit learning of spatiotemporal contingencies in spatial cueing. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2013 Aug; 39(4):1165-80.
Score: 0.012
-
Gupta N, Jang Y, Mednick SC, Huber DE. The road not taken: creative solutions require avoidance of high-frequency responses. Psychol Sci. 2012 Mar; 23(3):288-94.
Score: 0.011
-
Jang Y, Wixted JT, Pecher D, Zeelenberg R, Huber DE. Decomposing the interaction between retention interval and study/test practice: the role of retrievability. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2012; 65(5):962-75.
Score: 0.011
-
Davelaar EJ, Tian X, Weidemann CT, Huber DE. A habituation account of change detection in same/different judgments. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2011 Dec; 11(4):608-26.
Score: 0.011
-
Jang Y, Wallsten TS, Huber DE. A stochastic detection and retrieval model for the study of metacognition. Psychol Rev. 2012 Jan; 119(1):186-200.
Score: 0.011
-
Jang Y, Wixted JT, Huber DE. The diagnosticity of individual data for model selection: comparing signal-detection models of recognition memory. Psychon Bull Rev. 2011 Aug; 18(4):751-7.
Score: 0.011
-
Tian X, Poeppel D, Huber DE. TopoToolbox: using sensor topography to calculate psychologically meaningful measures from event-related EEG/MEG. Comput Intell Neurosci. 2011; 2011:674605.
Score: 0.010
-
Huber DE, Cowell RA. Theory-driven modeling or model-driven theorizing? Comment on McClelland et al. and Griffiths et al. Trends Cogn Sci. 2010 Aug; 14(8):343-4.
Score: 0.010
-
Rieth CA, Huber DE. Priming and habituation for faces: Individual differences and inversion effects. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2010 Jun; 36(3):596-618.
Score: 0.010
-
Tian X, Huber DE. Testing an associative account of semantic satiation. Cogn Psychol. 2010 Jun; 60(4):267-90.
Score: 0.010
-
Jang Y, Wixted JT, Huber DE. Testing signal-detection models of yes/no and two-alternative forced-choice recognition memory. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2009 May; 138(2):291-306.
Score: 0.009
-
Huber DE, Tian X, Curran T, O'Reilly RC, Woroch B. The dynamics of integration and separation: ERP, MEG, and neural network studies of immediate repetition effects. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2008 Dec; 34(6):1389-416.
Score: 0.009
-
Huber DE, Clark TF, Curran T, Winkielman P. Effects of repetition priming on recognition memory: testing a perceptual fluency-disfluency model. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2008 Nov; 34(6):1305-24.
Score: 0.009
-
Huber DE. Immediate priming and cognitive aftereffects. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2008 May; 137(2):324-47.
Score: 0.008
-
Jang Y, Huber DE. Context retrieval and context change in free recall: recalling from long-term memory drives list isolation. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2008 Jan; 34(1):112-27.
Score: 0.008
-
Tian X, Huber DE. Measures of spatial similarity and response magnitude in MEG and scalp EEG. Brain Topogr. 2008; 20(3):131-41.
Score: 0.008
-
Huber DE. Computer simulations of the ROUSE model: an analytic simulation technique and a comparison between the error variance-covariance and bootstrap methods for estimating parameter confidence. Behav Res Methods. 2006 Nov; 38(4):557-68.
Score: 0.008
-
Zhou L, Huber DE, van Antwerp B, Pennathur S. Electrooxidation of Phenol on Polyelectrolyte Modified Carbon Electrodes for Use in Insulin Pump Infusion Sets. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2024 May; 18(3):625-634.
Score: 0.006
-
Huber DE, Shiffrin RM, Quach R, Lyle KB. Mechanisms of source confusion and discounting in short-term priming: 1. Effects of prime duration and prime recognition. Mem Cognit. 2002 Jul; 30(5):745-57.
Score: 0.006
-
Sadil P, Potter KW, Huber DE, Cowell RA. Connecting the dots without top-down knowledge: Evidence for rapidly-learned low-level associations that are independent of object identity. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2019 Jun; 148(6):1058-1070.
Score: 0.005
-
Carr EW, Huber DE, Pecher D, Zeelenberg R, Halberstadt J, Winkielman P. The ugliness-in-averageness effect: Tempering the warm glow of familiarity. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2017 Jun; 112(6):787-812.
Score: 0.004
-
Smith KA, Huber DE, Vul E. Multiply-constrained semantic search in the Remote Associates Test. Cognition. 2013 Jul; 128(1):64-75.
Score: 0.003
-
Liu J, Li J, Rieth CA, Huber DE, Tian J, Lee K. A dynamic causal modeling analysis of the effective connectivities underlying top-down letter processing. Neuropsychologia. 2011 Apr; 49(5):1177-1186.
Score: 0.003
-
Pecher D, Boot I, van Dantzig S, Madden CJ, Huber DE, Zeelenberg R. The sound of enemies and friends in the neighborhood. Exp Psychol. 2011; 58(6):454-63.
Score: 0.003
-
Li J, Liu J, Liang J, Zhang H, Zhao J, Rieth CA, Huber DE, Li W, Shi G, Ai L, Tian J, Lee K. Effective connectivities of cortical regions for top-down face processing: a dynamic causal modeling study. Brain Res. 2010 Jun 22; 1340:40-51.
Score: 0.002
-
Liu J, Li J, Zhang H, Rieth CA, Huber DE, Li W, Lee K, Tian J. Neural correlates of top-down letter processing. Neuropsychologia. 2010 Jan; 48(2):636-41.
Score: 0.002
-
Tomlinson TD, Huber DE, Rieth CA, Davelaar EJ. An interference account of cue-independent forgetting in the no-think paradigm. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Sep 15; 106(37):15588-93.
Score: 0.002
-
Talasaz AH, Powell AA, Huber DE, Berbee JG, Roh KH, Yu W, Xiao W, Davis MM, Pease RF, Mindrinos MN, Jeffrey SS, Davis RW. Isolating highly enriched populations of circulating epithelial cells and other rare cells from blood using a magnetic sweeper device. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Mar 10; 106(10):3970-5.
Score: 0.002
-
Li J, Liu J, Liang J, Zhang H, Zhao J, Huber DE, Rieth CA, Lee K, Tian J, Shi G. A distributed neural system for top-down face processing. Neurosci Lett. 2009 Feb 13; 451(1):6-10.
Score: 0.002
-
Weidemann CT, Huber DE, Shiffrin RM. Prime diagnosticity in short-term repetition priming: is primed evidence discounted, even when it reliably indicates the correct answer? J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2008 Mar; 34(2):257-81.
Score: 0.002
-
Zhang H, Liu J, Huber DE, Rieth CA, Tian J, Lee K. Detecting faces in pure noise images: a functional MRI study on top-down perception. Neuroreport. 2008 Jan 22; 19(2):229-33.
Score: 0.002
-
Schacher M, Haemmerle B, Woermann FG, Okujava M, Huber D, Grunwald T, Kr?mer G, Jokeit H. Amygdala fMRI lateralizes temporal lobe epilepsy. Neurology. 2006 Jan 10; 66(1):81-7.
Score: 0.002
-
Weidemann CT, Huber DE, Shiffrin RM. Confusion and compensation in visual perception: effects of spatiotemporal proximity and selective attention. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2005 Feb; 31(1):40-61.
Score: 0.002
-
Shiffrin RM, Huber DE, Marinelli K. Effects of category length and strength on familiarity in recognition. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1995 Mar; 21(2):267-87.
Score: 0.001
|
Connection Strength
The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.
Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.
|