Connection
Rosemary Cowell to Humans
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Rosemary Cowell has written about Humans.
|
|
| |
Connection Strength |
|
 |
|
 |
| |
0.255 |
|
|
|
-
McCarter AC, Huber DE, Cowell RA. No evidence of a visual testing effect for novel, meaningless objects. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2025 Jul; 51(7):1122-1140.
Score: 0.023
-
Sanders DMW, Cowell RA. The locus of recognition memory signals in human cortex depends on the complexity of the memory representations. Cereb Cortex. 2023 08 23; 33(17):9835-9849.
Score: 0.021
-
Jiang Z, Sanders DMW, Cowell RA. Visual and semantic similarity norms for a photographic image stimulus set containing recognizable objects, animals and scenes. Behav Res Methods. 2022 10; 54(5):2364-2380.
Score: 0.019
-
Cowell RA, Barense MD, Sadil PS. A Roadmap for Understanding Memory: Decomposing Cognitive Processes into Operations and Representations. eNeuro. 2019 Jul/Aug; 6(4).
Score: 0.016
-
Sadil P, Potter KW, Huber DE, Cowell RA. Connecting the dots without top-down knowledge: Evidence for rapidly-learned low-level associations that are independent of object identity. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2019 Jun; 148(6):1058-1070.
Score: 0.016
-
Ross DA, Sadil P, Wilson DM, Cowell RA. Hippocampal Engagement during Recall Depends on Memory Content. Cereb Cortex. 2018 08 01; 28(8):2685-2698.
Score: 0.015
-
Wilson DM, Potter KW, Cowell RA. Recognition memory shielded from semantic but not perceptual interference in normal aging. Neuropsychologia. 2018 10; 119:448-463.
Score: 0.015
-
Cowell RA, Leger KR, Serences JT. Feature-coding transitions to conjunction-coding with progression through human visual cortex. J Neurophysiol. 2017 12 01; 118(6):3194-3214.
Score: 0.014
-
Sadil PS, Cowell RA. A Computational Model of Perceptual and Mnemonic Deficits in Medial Temporal Lobe Amnesia. J Cogn Neurosci. 2017 Jun; 29(6):1075-1088.
Score: 0.013
-
Cowell RA, Cottrell GW. What evidence supports special processing for faces? A cautionary tale for fMRI interpretation. J Cogn Neurosci. 2013 Nov; 25(11):1777-93.
Score: 0.010
-
Cowell RA. Computational models of perirhinal cortex function. Hippocampus. 2012 Oct; 22(10):1952-64.
Score: 0.010
-
Cowell RA, Bussey TJ, Saksida LM. Empiricists are from Venus, modelers are from Mars: Reconciling experimental and computational approaches in cognitive neuroscience. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2012 Nov; 36(10):2371-9.
Score: 0.010
-
Cowell RA, Bussey TJ, Saksida LM. Functional dissociations within the ventral object processing pathway: cognitive modules or a hierarchical continuum? J Cogn Neurosci. 2010 Nov; 22(11):2460-79.
Score: 0.009
-
Cowell RA, Bussey TJ, Saksida LM. Components of recognition memory: dissociable cognitive processes or just differences in representational complexity? Hippocampus. 2010 Nov; 20(11):1245-62.
Score: 0.009
-
Huber DE, Cowell RA. Theory-driven modeling or model-driven theorizing? Comment on McClelland et al. and Griffiths et al. Trends Cogn Sci. 2010 Aug; 14(8):343-4.
Score: 0.008
-
Cowell RA, Bussey TJ, Saksida LM. Why does brain damage impair memory? A connectionist model of object recognition memory in perirhinal cortex. J Neurosci. 2006 Nov 22; 26(47):12186-97.
Score: 0.007
-
Savalia T, Cowell RA, Huber DE. "Leap before you look": Conditions that suppress explicit, knowledge-based learning during visuomotor adaptation. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2024 Aug; 50(8):785-807.
Score: 0.006
-
Leger KR, Cowell RA, Gutchess A. Do cultural differences emerge at different levels of representational hierarchy? Mem Cognit. 2024 02; 52(2):241-253.
Score: 0.005
-
Sadil P, Cowell RA, Huber DE. The push-pull of serial dependence effects: Attraction to the prior response and repulsion from the prior stimulus. Psychon Bull Rev. 2024 Feb; 31(1):259-273.
Score: 0.005
-
Sadil P, Cowell RA, Huber DE. A modeling framework for determining modulation of neural-level tuning from non-invasive human fMRI data. Commun Biol. 2022 11 14; 5(1):1244.
Score: 0.005
-
Sanders DMW, Cowell RA, Castillo J, Starns JJ. Boosting confidence without boosting performance: item strength creates the illusion of source accuracy. Memory. 2022 10; 30(9):1172-1191.
Score: 0.005
-
Newsome RN, Trelle AN, Fidalgo C, Hong B, Smith VM, Jacob A, Ryan JD, Rosenbaum RS, Cowell RA, Barense MD. Dissociable contributions of thalamic nuclei to recognition memory: novel evidence from a case of medial dorsal thalamic damage. Learn Mem. 2018 01; 25(1):31-44.
Score: 0.004
-
Martin CB, Cowell RA, Gribble PL, Wright J, Köhler S. Distributed category-specific recognition-memory signals in human perirhinal cortex. Hippocampus. 2016 Apr; 26(4):423-36.
Score: 0.003
-
Yeung LK, Ryan JD, Cowell RA, Barense MD. Recognition memory impairments caused by false recognition of novel objects. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2013 Nov; 142(4):1384-97.
Score: 0.003
-
Forwood SE, Cowell RA, Bussey TJ, Saksida LM. Multiple cognitive abilities from a single cortical algorithm. J Cogn Neurosci. 2012 Sep; 24(9):1807-25.
Score: 0.002
-
van Dantzig S, Cowell RA, Zeelenberg R, Pecher D. A sharp image or a sharp knife: norms for the modality-exclusivity of 774 concept-property items. Behav Res Methods. 2011 Mar; 43(1):145-54.
Score: 0.002
|
Connection Strength
The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.
Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.
|