 Connection
David Simpson to Homeostasis
This is a "connection" page, showing publications David Simpson has written about Homeostasis.
|
|
| |
Connection Strength |
|
 |
|
 |
| |
3.430 |
|
|
|
-
Simpson DM, Payne SJ, Panerai RB. The INfoMATAS project: Methods for assessing cerebral autoregulation in stroke. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2022 03; 42(3):411-429.
Score: 0.589
-
Simpson D, Claassen J. CrossTalk opposing view: dynamic cerebral autoregulation should be quantified using induced (rather than spontaneous) blood pressure fluctuations. J Physiol. 2018 01 01; 596(1):7-9.
Score: 0.459
-
Mitsis GD, Simpson DM. Special issue on cerebral autoregulation: measurement and modelling. Med Eng Phys. 2014 May; 36(5):561-2.
Score: 0.354
-
Angarita-Jaimes N, Kouchakpour H, Liu J, Panerai RB, Simpson DM. Optimising the assessment of cerebral autoregulation from black box models. Med Eng Phys. 2014 May; 36(5):607-12.
Score: 0.352
-
Kouchakpour H, Allen R, Simpson DM. Nonlinear, multiple-input modeling of cerebral autoregulation using Volterra Kernel estimation. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2010; 2010:2375-8.
Score: 0.265
-
Bryant JED, Birch AA, Panerai RB, Nikolic D, Bulters D, Simpson DM. Estimating confidence intervals for cerebral autoregulation: a parametric bootstrap approach. Physiol Meas. 2021 10 29; 42(10).
Score: 0.150
-
Elting JW, Sanders ML, Panerai RB, Aries M, Bor-Seng-Shu E, Caicedo A, Chacon M, Gommer ED, Van Huffel S, Jara JL, Kostoglou K, Mahdi A, Marmarelis VZ, Mitsis GD, M?ller M, Nikolic D, Nogueira RC, Payne SJ, Puppo C, Shin DC, Simpson DM, Tarumi T, Yelicich B, Zhang R, Claassen JAHR. Assessment of dynamic cerebral autoregulation in humans: Is reproducibility dependent on blood pressure variability? PLoS One. 2020; 15(1):e0227651.
Score: 0.133
-
Sanders ML, Claassen JAHR, Aries M, Bor-Seng-Shu E, Caicedo A, Chacon M, Gommer ED, Van Huffel S, Jara JL, Kostoglou K, Mahdi A, Marmarelis VZ, Mitsis GD, M?ller M, Nikolic D, Nogueira RC, Payne SJ, Puppo C, Shin DC, Simpson DM, Tarumi T, Yelicich B, Zhang R, Panerai RB, Elting JWJ. Reproducibility of dynamic cerebral autoregulation parameters: a multi-centre, multi-method study. Physiol Meas. 2018 12 07; 39(12):125002.
Score: 0.123
-
Simpson D, Claassen J. Rebuttal from David Simpson and Jurgen Claassen. J Physiol. 2018 01 01; 596(1):13.
Score: 0.115
-
Katsogridakis E, Simpson DM, Bush G, Fan L, Birch AA, Allen R, Potter JF, Panerai RB. Coherent averaging of pseudorandom binary stimuli: is the dynamic cerebral autoregulatory response symmetrical? Physiol Meas. 2017 Nov 30; 38(12):2164-2175.
Score: 0.115
-
Mahdi A, Nikolic D, Birch AA, Olufsen MS, Panerai RB, Simpson DM, Payne SJ. Increased blood pressure variability upon standing up improves reproducibility of cerebral autoregulation indices. Med Eng Phys. 2017 09; 47:151-158.
Score: 0.111
-
Katsogridakis E, Simpson DM, Bush G, Fan L, Birch AA, Allen R, Potter JF, Panerai RB. Revisiting the frequency domain: the multiple and partial coherence of cerebral blood flow velocity in the assessment of dynamic cerebral autoregulation. Physiol Meas. 2016 07; 37(7):1056-73.
Score: 0.103
-
Claassen JA, Meel-van den Abeelen AS, Simpson DM, Panerai RB. Transfer function analysis of dynamic cerebral autoregulation: A white paper from the International Cerebral Autoregulation Research Network. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2016 Apr; 36(4):665-80.
Score: 0.101
-
Meel-van den Abeelen AS, Simpson DM, Wang LJ, Slump CH, Zhang R, Tarumi T, Rickards CA, Payne S, Mitsis GD, Kostoglou K, Marmarelis V, Shin D, Tzeng YC, Ainslie PN, Gommer E, M?ller M, Dorado AC, Smielewski P, Yelicich B, Puppo C, Liu X, Czosnyka M, Wang CY, Novak V, Panerai RB, Claassen JA. Between-centre variability in transfer function analysis, a widely used method for linear quantification of the dynamic pressure-flow relation: the CARNet study. Med Eng Phys. 2014 May; 36(5):620-7.
Score: 0.089
-
Katsogridakis E, Bush G, Fan L, Birch AA, Simpson DM, Allen R, Potter JF, Panerai RB. Random perturbations of arterial blood pressure for the assessment of dynamic cerebral autoregulation. Physiol Meas. 2012 Feb; 33(2):103-16.
Score: 0.076
-
Ramos EG, Simpson DM, Panerai RB, Nadal J, Lopes JM, Evans DH. Objective selection of signals for assessment of cerebral blood flow autoregulation in neonates. Physiol Meas. 2006 Jan; 27(1):35-49.
Score: 0.050
-
Kostoglou K, Simpson DM, Payne SJ. Point/counterpoint: We should not take the direction of blood pressure change into consideration for dynamic cerebral autoregulation quantification. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2022 12; 42(12):2354-2356.
Score: 0.040
-
Liu J, Simpson DM, Panerai RB. Point-Counterpoint: Transfer function analysis of dynamic cerebral autoregulation: To band or not to band? J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2023 09; 43(9):1628-1630.
Score: 0.039
-
Liu J, Guo ZN, Simpson D, Zhang P, Liu C, Song JN, Leng X, Yang Y. A Data-Driven Approach to Transfer Function Analysis for Superior Discriminative Power: Optimized Assessment of Dynamic Cerebral Autoregulation. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2021 04; 25(4):909-921.
Score: 0.036
-
Simpson DM, Panerai RB, Evans DH, Garnham J, Naylor AR, Bell PR. Estimating normal and pathological dynamic responses in cerebral blood flow velocity to step changes in end-tidal pCO2. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2000 Sep; 38(5):535-9.
Score: 0.035
-
Han Y, Sanford L, Simpson DM, Dowell RD, Palmer AE. Remodeling of Zn2+ homeostasis upon differentiation of mammary epithelial cells. Metallomics. 2020 03 25; 12(3):346-362.
Score: 0.034
-
Yang Y, Simpson D, Hu B, Liu J, Xiong L. Cerebrovascular Regulation in Neurological Disorders. Biomed Res Int. 2018; 2018:8140545.
Score: 0.030
-
Fan L, Bush G, Katsogridakis E, Simpson DM, Allen R, Potter J, Birch AA, Panerai RB. Adaptive feedback analysis and control of programmable stimuli for assessment of cerebrovascular function. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2013 Jun; 51(6):709-18.
Score: 0.021
-
Liu J, Simpson DM, Allen R. High spontaneous fluctuation in arterial blood pressure improves the assessment of cerebral autoregulation. Physiol Meas. 2005 Oct; 26(5):725-41.
Score: 0.012
|
Connection Strength
The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.
Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.
|