 Connection
Jordan Karlitz to Colonoscopy
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Jordan Karlitz has written about Colonoscopy.
|
|
| |
Connection Strength |
|
 |
|
 |
| |
3.614 |
|
|
|
-
Greene M, Stieber B, Ozbay AB, Anderson J, LeMaster J, Dore M, Stukalin I, Arroyo J, Ebner DW, Fendrick AM, Karlitz JJ. Multitarget Stool DNA Versus Fecal Immunochemical Testing: A National Assessment of Follow-Up Colonoscopy by Race and Ethnicity. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2026 Jul; 24(7).
Score: 0.800
-
Greene M, Stieber B, LeMaster JW, Idriss R, Stukalin I, Zapatier J, Arroyo J, Anderson J, Karlitz JJ. Closing the loop in colorectal cancer screening: real-world adherence to follow-up colonoscopy after positive mt-sDNA vs FIT/FOBT, stratified by payer type. Curr Med Res Opin. 2025 Sep; 41(9):1629-1639.
Score: 0.763
-
Molmenti CL, Kolb JM, Karlitz JJ. Advanced Colorectal Polyps on Colonoscopy: A Trigger for Earlier Screening of Family Members. Am J Gastroenterol. 2020 03; 115(3):311-314.
Score: 0.516
-
Karlitz JJ. The effectiveness of colonoscopy in reducing mortality from colorectal cancer. Ann Intern Med. 2009 Jun 02; 150(11):816; author reply 819-20.
Score: 0.245
-
Greene M, Camardo M, Karlitz JJ, Nowd P, Wang W, Anderson J, Kisiel J, Ebner D. Real-world adherence to multi-target stool DNA testing and its association with time to follow-up colonoscopy: a health-system analysis from Massachusetts General Hospital. Curr Med Res Opin. 2026 Feb; 42(2):205-219.
Score: 0.196
-
Greene M, Camardo M, Karlitz JJ, Nowd P, Son J, Fuerstein J, Li J, Rittner S. Adherence to multi-target stool DNA test and time to follow-up colonoscopy: real-world analysis of patients from the Beth Israel Lahey Health. Curr Med Res Opin. 2025 Oct; 41(10):1811-1823.
Score: 0.192
-
Greene M, Le QA, Ozbay AB, Karlitz JJ, Fendrick AM. Completing the colorectal cancer screening process: impact of eliminating cost-sharing for follow-up colonoscopy. Curr Med Res Opin. 2025 Sep; 41(9):1697-1703.
Score: 0.191
-
Greene M, Gohil S, Stieber B, Ozbay AB, Le QA, Kakuturu R, LeMaster JW, Dore M, Fendrick AM, Anderson JC, Karlitz JJ. Utilization of colorectal cancer screening modalities in the United States (2017-2023): a national multi-payer claims database analysis. Curr Med Res Opin. 2025 Sep; 41(9):1619-1628.
Score: 0.190
-
Fendrick AM, Fisher DA, Saoud L, Ozbay AB, Karlitz JJ, Limburg PJ. Impact of Patient Adherence to Stool-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening and Colonoscopy Following a Positive Test on Clinical Outcomes. Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2021 09; 14(9):845-850.
Score: 0.140
-
Montminy EM, Jang A, Conner M, Karlitz JJ. Screening for Colorectal Cancer. Med Clin North Am. 2020 Nov; 104(6):1023-1036.
Score: 0.135
-
Karlitz JJ, Tepler IA, Tanaka KE. Endometriosis with colonic wall invasion. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007 Mar; 5(3):A30.
Score: 0.050
-
Greene M, Anderson J, LeMaster J, Arroyo J, Zapatier J, Bingham J, Kakuturu R, Karlitz JJ, Le Q. Real-World Adherence to Repeat Colorectal Cancer Screening With the Multi-Target Stool DNA Test in a Large, Insured, and Average-Risk Population. Cancer Med. 2025 Nov; 14(21):e71314.
Score: 0.048
-
Gohil S, D'Attilio D, Paladiya R, Ganguly A, Vergara CM, Karlitz JJ, Greene M. Adherence to multi-target stool DNA colorectal cancer screening and clinical follow-up in the Hartford HealthCare system. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2025 Sep 16; 40(1):200.
Score: 0.047
-
Yen T, Scolaro J, Montminy E, Karlitz JJ, Wani S, Patel SG. Spectrum of Advanced Colorectal Neoplasia and Anticipated Yield of Average-Risk Screening in Veterans Under Age 50. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023 03; 21(3):827-829.e3.
Score: 0.036
-
Fisher DA, Karlitz JJ, Jeyakumar S, Smith N, Limburg P, Lieberman D, Fendrick AM. Real-world cost-effectiveness of stool-based colorectal cancer screening in a Medicare population. J Med Econ. 2021 Jan-Dec; 24(1):654-664.
Score: 0.034
-
Montminy EM, Karlitz JJ, Landreneau SW. Progress of colorectal cancer screening in United States: Past achievements and future challenges. Prev Med. 2019 03; 120:78-84.
Score: 0.030
|
Connection Strength
The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.
Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.
|