 Connection
Danielle Cooke to Phantoms, Imaging
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Danielle Cooke has written about Phantoms, Imaging.
|
|
| |
Connection Strength |
|
 |
|
 |
| |
0.907 |
|
|
|
-
Mabray MC, Datta S, Lillaney PV, Moore T, Gehrisch S, Talbott JF, Levitt MR, Ghodke BV, Larson PS, Cooke DL. Accuracy of flat panel detector CT with integrated navigational software with and without MR fusion for single-pass needle placement. J Neurointerv Surg. 2016 Jul; 8(7):731-5.
Score: 0.476
-
Talbott JF, Cooke DL, Mabray MC, Larson PS, Amans MR, Hetts SW, Wilson MW, Moore T, Salegio EA. Accuracy of image-guided percutaneous injection into a phantom spinal cord utilizing flat panel detector CT with MR fusion and integrated navigational software. J Neurointerv Surg. 2018 Dec; 10(12):e37.
Score: 0.145
-
Cooke DL, Levitt MR, Kim LJ, Hallam DK, Sekhar LN, Ghodke BV. Laser-assisted flat-detector CT-guided intracranial access. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2016 Mar; 11(3):467-72.
Score: 0.120
-
Losey AD, Lillaney P, Martin AJ, Cooke DL, Wilson MW, Thorne BR, Sincic RS, Arenson RL, Saeed M, Hetts SW. Magnetically assisted remote-controlled endovascular catheter for interventional MR imaging: in vitro navigation at 1.5 T versus X-ray fluoroscopy. Radiology. 2014 Jun; 271(3):862-9.
Score: 0.109
-
Moftakhar P, Lillaney P, Losey AD, Cooke DL, Martin AJ, Thorne BR, Arenson RL, Saeed M, Wilson MW, Hetts SW. New-Generation Laser-lithographed Dual-Axis Magnetically Assisted Remote-controlled Endovascular Catheter for Interventional MR Imaging: In Vitro Multiplanar Navigation at 1.5 T and 3 T versus X-ray Fluoroscopy. Radiology. 2015 Dec; 277(3):842-52.
Score: 0.030
-
Sincic RS, Caton CJ, Lillaney P, Goodfriend S, Ni J, Martin AJ, Losey AD, Shah N, Yee EJ, Evans L, Malba V, Bernhardt AF, Settecase F, Cooke DL, Saeed M, Wilson MW, Hetts SW. System architecture for a magnetically guided endovascular microcatheter. Biomed Microdevices. 2014 Feb; 16(1):97-106.
Score: 0.027
|
Connection Strength
The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.
Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.
|