 Connection
Danielle Cooke to Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Interventional
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Danielle Cooke has written about Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Interventional.
|
|
| |
Connection Strength |
|
 |
|
 |
| |
0.881 |
|
|
|
-
Cooke DL, Levitt M, Kim LJ, Hallam DK, Ghodke B. Intraorbital access using fluoroscopic flat panel detector CT navigation and three-dimensional MRI overlay. J Neurointerv Surg. 2010 Sep; 2(3):249-51.
Score: 0.363
-
Lillaney PV, Yang JK, Losey AD, Martin AJ, Cooke DL, Thorne BR, Barry DC, Chu A, Stillson C, Do L, Arenson RL, Saeed M, Wilson MW, Hetts SW. Endovascular MR-guided Renal Embolization by Using a Magnetically Assisted Remote-controlled Catheter System. Radiology. 2016 10; 281(1):219-28.
Score: 0.133
-
Moftakhar P, Lillaney P, Losey AD, Cooke DL, Martin AJ, Thorne BR, Arenson RL, Saeed M, Wilson MW, Hetts SW. New-Generation Laser-lithographed Dual-Axis Magnetically Assisted Remote-controlled Endovascular Catheter for Interventional MR Imaging: In Vitro Multiplanar Navigation at 1.5 T and 3 T versus X-ray Fluoroscopy. Radiology. 2015 Dec; 277(3):842-52.
Score: 0.126
-
Losey AD, Lillaney P, Martin AJ, Cooke DL, Wilson MW, Thorne BR, Sincic RS, Arenson RL, Saeed M, Hetts SW. Magnetically assisted remote-controlled endovascular catheter for interventional MR imaging: in vitro navigation at 1.5 T versus X-ray fluoroscopy. Radiology. 2014 Jun; 271(3):862-9.
Score: 0.115
-
Lillaney P, Caton C, Martin AJ, Losey AD, Evans L, Saeed M, Cooke DL, Wilson MW, Hetts SW. Comparing deflection measurements of a magnetically steerable catheter using optical imaging and MRI. Med Phys. 2014 Feb; 41(2):022305.
Score: 0.115
-
Sincic RS, Caton CJ, Lillaney P, Goodfriend S, Ni J, Martin AJ, Losey AD, Shah N, Yee EJ, Evans L, Malba V, Bernhardt AF, Settecase F, Cooke DL, Saeed M, Wilson MW, Hetts SW. System architecture for a magnetically guided endovascular microcatheter. Biomed Microdevices. 2014 Feb; 16(1):97-106.
Score: 0.029
|
Connection Strength
The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.
Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.
|