Colorado PROFILES, The Colorado Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute (CCTSI)
Keywords
Last Name
Institution

Contact Us
If you have any questions or feedback please contact us.

Connection

Carmen Lewis to Adult

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Carmen Lewis has written about Adult.

 
Connection Strength
 
 
 
0.158
 
  1. Dalton AF, Golin CE, Esserman D, Pignone MP, Pathman DE, Lewis CL. Relationship between Physicians' Uncertainty about Clinical Assessments and Patient-Centered Recommendations for Colorectal Cancer Screening in the Elderly. Med Decis Making. 2015 05; 35(4):458-66.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  2. Lewis CL, Esserman D, DeLeon C, Pignone MP, Pathman DE, Golin C. Physician decision making for colorectal cancer screening in the elderly. J Gen Intern Med. 2013 Sep; 28(9):1202-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  3. Lewis CL, Griffith J, Pignone MP, Golin C. Physicians' decisions about continuing or stopping colon cancer screening in the elderly: a qualitative study. J Gen Intern Med. 2009 Jul; 24(7):816-21.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  4. Lewis CL, Moore CG, Golin CE, Griffith J, Tytell-Brenner A, Pignone MP. Resident physicians' life expectancy estimates and colon cancer screening recommendations in elderly patients. Med Decis Making. 2008 Mar-Apr; 28(2):254-61.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  5. Morse B, Parmet T, Yoder G, Tate CE, Lewis CL, McCaffery K, Cappella JN, Hersch J, Schapira MM, Scherer LD. Evaluation of how US women react to a decision aid informing them of the harms and benefits of mammography: a qualitative study. BMJ Open. 2025 Mar 18; 15(3):e087997.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  6. Scherer LD, Lewis CL, Cappella JN, Hersch J, McCaffery K, Tate C, Smyth HL, Mosley B, Morse B, Schapira MM. Skeptical reactions to breast cancer screening benefits and harms: Antecedents, consequences, and implications for screening communication. Health Psychol. 2025 Jun; 44(6):608-619.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  7. Lewis CL, Cox CE, Garrett JM, Hanson L, Holmes GM, Howard A, Carey TS. Trends in the use of feeding tubes in North Carolina hospitals. J Gen Intern Med. 2004 Oct; 19(10):1034-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  8. Lewis CL, Kinsinger LS, Harris RP, Schwartz RJ. Breast cancer risk in primary care: implications for chemoprevention. Arch Intern Med. 2004 Sep 27; 164(17):1897-903.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  9. Scherer LD, Lewis CL, McCaffery K, Hersch J, Cappella JN, Tate C, Morse B, Arnett K, Mosley B, Smyth HL, Schapira MM. Mammography Screening Preferences Among Screening-Eligible Women in Their 40s : A National U.S. Survey. Ann Intern Med. 2024 Aug; 177(8):1069-1077.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  10. Lewis CL, Pignone MP, Sheridan SL, Downs SM, Kinsinger LS. A randomized trial of three videos that differ in the framing of information about mammography in women 40 to 49 years old. J Gen Intern Med. 2003 Nov; 18(11):875-83.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  11. Cox CE, Lewis CL, Hanson LC, Hough CL, Kahn JM, White DB, Song MK, Tulsky JA, Carson SS. Development and pilot testing of a decision aid for surrogates of patients with prolonged mechanical ventilation. Crit Care Med. 2012 Aug; 40(8):2327-34.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  12. Hoffman RM, Lewis CL, Pignone MP, Couper MP, Barry MJ, Elmore JG, Levin CA, Van Hoewyk J, Zikmund-Fisher BJ. Decision-making processes for breast, colorectal, and prostate cancer screening: the DECISIONS survey. Med Decis Making. 2010 Sep-Oct; 30(5 Suppl):53S-64S.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  13. Griffith JM, Lewis CL, Hawley S, Sheridan SL, Pignone MP. Randomized trial of presenting absolute v. relative risk reduction in the elicitation of patient values for heart disease prevention with conjoint analysis. Med Decis Making. 2009 Mar-Apr; 29(2):167-74.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  14. Watson LC, Lewis CL, Fillenbaum GG. Asking family about memory loss. Is it helpful? J Gen Intern Med. 2005 Jan; 20(1):28-32.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.

Copyright © 2025 The Regents of the University of Colorado, a body corporate. All rights reserved. (Harvard PROFILES RNS software version: 2.11.1)