 Connection
Russell Glasgow to Self Care
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Russell Glasgow has written about Self Care.
|
|
| |
Connection Strength |
|
 |
|
 |
| |
9.271 |
|
|
|
-
Glasgow RE, Strycker LA, King DK, Toobert DJ. Understanding who benefits at each step in an internet-based diabetes self-management program: application of a recursive partitioning approach. Med Decis Making. 2014 02; 34(2):180-91.
Score: 0.359
-
Glasgow RE, Dickinson P, Fisher L, Christiansen S, Toobert DJ, Bender BG, Dickinson LM, Jortberg B, Estabrooks PA. Use of RE-AIM to develop a multi-media facilitation tool for the patient-centered medical home. Implement Sci. 2011 Oct 21; 6:118.
Score: 0.318
-
Glasgow RE, Kurz D, King D, Dickman JM, Faber AJ, Halterman E, Woolley T, Toobert DJ, Strycker LA, Estabrooks PA, Osuna D, Ritzwoller D. Twelve-month outcomes of an Internet-based diabetes self-management support program. Patient Educ Couns. 2012 Apr; 87(1):81-92.
Score: 0.315
-
Toobert DJ, Strycker LA, Barrera M, Osuna D, King DK, Glasgow RE. Outcomes from a multiple risk factor diabetes self-management trial for Latinas: ?Viva Bien! Ann Behav Med. 2011 Jun; 41(3):310-23.
Score: 0.309
-
Glasgow RE, Christiansen SM, Kurz D, King DK, Woolley T, Faber AJ, Estabrooks PA, Strycker L, Toobert D, Dickman J. Engagement in a diabetes self-management website: usage patterns and generalizability of program use. J Med Internet Res. 2011 Jan 25; 13(1):e9.
Score: 0.302
-
Glasgow RE. Interactive media for diabetes self-management: issues in maximizing public health impact. Med Decis Making. 2010 Nov-Dec; 30(6):745-58.
Score: 0.297
-
Glasgow RE, Kurz D, King D, Dickman JM, Faber AJ, Halterman E, Wooley T, Toobert DJ, Strycker LA, Estabrooks PA, Osuna D, Ritzwoller D. Outcomes of minimal and moderate support versions of an internet-based diabetes self-management support program. J Gen Intern Med. 2010 Dec; 25(12):1315-22.
Score: 0.293
-
Glasgow RE, Strycker LA, Kurz D, Faber A, Bell H, Dickman JM, Halterman E, Estabrooks PA, Osuna D. Recruitment for an internet-based diabetes self-management program: scientific and ethical implications. Ann Behav Med. 2010 Aug; 40(1):40-8.
Score: 0.292
-
Glasgow RE, Edwards LL, Whitesides H, Carroll N, Sanders TJ, McCray BL. Reach and effectiveness of DVD and in-person diabetes self-management education. Chronic Illn. 2009 Dec; 5(4):243-9.
Score: 0.278
-
McCormack LA, Williams-Piehota PA, Bann CM, Burton J, Kamerow DB, Squire C, Fisher E, Brownson CA, Glasgow RE. Development and validation of an instrument to measure resources and support for chronic illness self-management: a model using diabetes. Diabetes Educ. 2008 Jul-Aug; 34(4):707-18.
Score: 0.253
-
Glasgow RE, Peeples M, Skovlund SE. Where is the patient in diabetes performance measures? The case for including patient-centered and self-management measures. Diabetes Care. 2008 May; 31(5):1046-50.
Score: 0.250
-
Williams GC, Lynch M, Glasgow RE. Computer-assisted intervention improves patient-centered diabetes care by increasing autonomy support. Health Psychol. 2007 Nov; 26(6):728-734.
Score: 0.241
-
Fisher L, Glasgow RE. A call for more effectively integrating behavioral and social science principles into comprehensive diabetes care. Diabetes Care. 2007 Oct; 30(10):2746-9.
Score: 0.240
-
Brownson CA, Miller D, Crespo R, Neuner S, Thompson J, Wall JC, Emont S, Fazzone P, Fisher EB, Glasgow RE. A quality improvement tool to assess self-management support in primary care. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2007 Jul; 33(7):408-16.
Score: 0.236
-
Glasgow RE, Fisher L, Skaff M, Mullan J, Toobert DJ. Problem solving and diabetes self-management: investigation in a large, multiracial sample. Diabetes Care. 2007 Jan; 30(1):33-7.
Score: 0.228
-
King DK, Estabrooks PA, Strycker LA, Toobert DJ, Bull SS, Glasgow RE. Outcomes of a multifaceted physical activity regimen as part of a diabetes self-management intervention. Ann Behav Med. 2006 Apr; 31(2):128-37.
Score: 0.216
-
Glasgow RE, Strycker LA, King DK, Toobert DJ, Rahm AK, Jex M, Nutting PA. Robustness of a computer-assisted diabetes self-management intervention across patient characteristics, healthcare settings, and intervention staff. Am J Manag Care. 2006 Mar; 12(3):137-45.
Score: 0.215
-
Glasgow RE, Nutting PA, Toobert DJ, King DK, Strycker LA, Jex M, O'Neill C, Whitesides H, Merenich J. Effects of a brief computer-assisted diabetes self-management intervention on dietary, biological and quality-of-life outcomes. Chronic Illn. 2006 Mar; 2(1):27-38.
Score: 0.215
-
Glasgow RE, Nelson CC, Strycker LA, King DK. Using RE-AIM metrics to evaluate diabetes self-management support interventions. Am J Prev Med. 2006 Jan; 30(1):67-73.
Score: 0.212
-
Glasgow RE, Whitesides H, Nelson CC, King DK. Use of the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC) with diabetic patients: relationship to patient characteristics, receipt of care, and self-management. Diabetes Care. 2005 Nov; 28(11):2655-61.
Score: 0.210
-
Fisher EB, Brownson CA, O'Toole ML, Shetty G, Anwuri VV, Glasgow RE. Ecological approaches to self-management: the case of diabetes. Am J Public Health. 2005 Sep; 95(9):1523-35.
Score: 0.206
-
Bull SS, Gaglio B, McKay HG, Glasgow RE. Harnessing the potential of the internet to promote chronic illness self-management: diabetes as an example of how well we are doing. Chronic Illn. 2005 Jun; 1(2):143-55.
Score: 0.204
-
Estabrooks PA, Nelson CC, Xu S, King D, Bayliss EA, Gaglio B, Nutting PA, Glasgow RE. The frequency and behavioral outcomes of goal choices in the self-management of diabetes. Diabetes Educ. 2005 May-Jun; 31(3):391-400.
Score: 0.203
-
Williams GC, McGregor HA, King D, Nelson CC, Glasgow RE. Variation in perceived competence, glycemic control, and patient satisfaction: relationship to autonomy support from physicians. Patient Educ Couns. 2005 Apr; 57(1):39-45.
Score: 0.202
-
Glasgow RE, Toobert DJ, Barrera M, Strycker LA. Assessment of problem-solving: a key to successful diabetes self-management. J Behav Med. 2004 Oct; 27(5):477-90.
Score: 0.195
-
Glasgow RE, Davis CL, Funnell MM, Beck A. Implementing practical interventions to support chronic illness self-management. Jt Comm J Qual Saf. 2003 Nov; 29(11):563-74.
Score: 0.183
-
Glasgow RE, Boles SM, McKay HG, Feil EG, Barrera M. The D-Net diabetes self-management program: long-term implementation, outcomes, and generalization results. Prev Med. 2003 Apr; 36(4):410-9.
Score: 0.175
-
Glasgow RE, Toobert DJ. Brief, computer-assisted diabetes dietary self-management counseling: effects on behavior, physiologic outcomes, and quality of life. Med Care. 2000 Nov; 38(11):1062-73.
Score: 0.148
-
Toobert DJ, Hampson SE, Glasgow RE. The summary of diabetes self-care activities measure: results from 7 studies and a revised scale. Diabetes Care. 2000 Jul; 23(7):943-50.
Score: 0.145
-
Glasgow RE. Outcomes of and for diabetes education research. Diabetes Educ. 1999 Nov-Dec; 25(6 Suppl):74-88.
Score: 0.139
-
Glasgow RE, Hampson SE, Strycker LA, Ruggiero L. Personal-model beliefs and social-environmental barriers related to diabetes self-management. Diabetes Care. 1997 Apr; 20(4):556-61.
Score: 0.116
-
Glasgow RE, Ruggiero L, Eakin EG, Dryfoos J, Chobanian L. Quality of life and associated characteristics in a large national sample of adults with diabetes. Diabetes Care. 1997 Apr; 20(4):562-7.
Score: 0.116
-
Glasgow RE, Eakin EG, Toobert DJ. How generalizable are the results of diabetes self-management research? The impact of participation and attrition. Diabetes Educ. 1996 Nov-Dec; 22(6):573-4, 581-2, 584-5.
Score: 0.113
-
Glasgow RE, Toobert DJ, Hampson SE. Effects of a brief office-based intervention to facilitate diabetes dietary self-management. Diabetes Care. 1996 Aug; 19(8):835-42.
Score: 0.111
-
Glasgow RE, Toobert DJ, Hampson SE, Noell JW. A brief office-based intervention to facilitate diabetes dietary self-management. Health Educ Res. 1995 Dec; 10(4):467-78.
Score: 0.106
-
Glasgow RE. A practical model of diabetes management and education. Diabetes Care. 1995 Jan; 18(1):117-26.
Score: 0.099
-
Ruiz S, Brady TJ, Glasgow RE, Birkel R, Spafford M. Chronic condition self-management surveillance: what is and what should be measured? Prev Chronic Dis. 2014 Jun 19; 11:E103.
Score: 0.095
-
Fisher L, Hessler D, Glasgow RE, Arean PA, Masharani U, Naranjo D, Strycker LA. REDEEM: a pragmatic trial to reduce diabetes distress. Diabetes Care. 2013 Sep; 36(9):2551-8.
Score: 0.089
-
Bennett GG, Warner ET, Glasgow RE, Askew S, Goldman J, Ritzwoller DP, Emmons KM, Rosner BA, Colditz GA. Obesity treatment for socioeconomically disadvantaged patients in primary care practice. Arch Intern Med. 2012 Apr 09; 172(7):565-74.
Score: 0.082
-
Glasgow RE, Toobert DJ, Hampson SE, Brown JE, Lewinsohn PM, Donnelly J. Improving self-care among older patients with type II diabetes: the "Sixty Something..." Study. Patient Educ Couns. 1992 Feb; 19(1):61-74.
Score: 0.081
-
Fisher L, Glasgow RE, Strycker LA. The relationship between diabetes distress and clinical depression with glycemic control among patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2010 May; 33(5):1034-6.
Score: 0.071
-
King DK, Glasgow RE, Toobert DJ, Strycker LA, Estabrooks PA, Osuna D, Faber AJ. Self-efficacy, problem solving, and social-environmental support are associated with diabetes self-management behaviors. Diabetes Care. 2010 Apr; 33(4):751-3.
Score: 0.071
-
Kingery PM, Glasgow RE. Self-efficacy and outcome expectations in the self-regulation of non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus. Health Educ. 1989 Dec; 20(7):13-9.
Score: 0.070
-
Glasgow RE, Toobert DJ, Riddle M, Donnelly J, Mitchell DL, Calder D. Diabetes-specific social learning variables and self-care behaviors among persons with type II diabetes. Health Psychol. 1989; 8(3):285-303.
Score: 0.065
-
Schmittdiel J, Mosen DM, Glasgow RE, Hibbard J, Remmers C, Bellows J. Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC) and improved patient-centered outcomes for chronic conditions. J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Jan; 23(1):77-80.
Score: 0.061
-
Glasgow RE, McCaul KD, Schafer LC. Self-care behaviors and glycemic control in type I diabetes. J Chronic Dis. 1987; 40(5):399-412.
Score: 0.057
-
Nutting PA, Dickinson WP, Dickinson LM, Nelson CC, King DK, Crabtree BF, Glasgow RE. Use of chronic care model elements is associated with higher-quality care for diabetes. Ann Fam Med. 2007 Jan-Feb; 5(1):14-20.
Score: 0.057
-
Glasgow RE, Wilson W, McCaul KD. Regimen adherence: a problematic construct in diabetes research. Diabetes Care. 1985 May-Jun; 8(3):300-1.
Score: 0.051
-
Glasgow RE, Nutting PA, King DK, Nelson CC, Cutter G, Gaglio B, Rahm AK, Whitesides H. Randomized effectiveness trial of a computer-assisted intervention to improve diabetes care. Diabetes Care. 2005 Jan; 28(1):33-9.
Score: 0.050
-
Amthauer H, Gaglio B, Glasgow RE, Dortch W, King DK. Lessons learned: patient recruitment strategies for a type 2 diabetes intervention in a primary care setting [corrected]. Diabetes Educ. 2003 Jul-Aug; 29(4):673-81.
Score: 0.045
-
Norris SL, Nichols PJ, Caspersen CJ, Glasgow RE, Engelgau MM, Jack L, Snyder SR, Carande-Kulis VG, Isham G, Garfield S, Briss P, McCulloch D. Increasing diabetes self-management education in community settings. A systematic review. Am J Prev Med. 2002 May; 22(4 Suppl):39-66.
Score: 0.041
-
Eakin EG, Bull SS, Glasgow RE, Mason M. Reaching those most in need: a review of diabetes self-management interventions in disadvantaged populations. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2002 Jan-Feb; 18(1):26-35.
Score: 0.040
-
Glasgow RE, Orleans CT, Wagner EH. Does the chronic care model serve also as a template for improving prevention? Milbank Q. 2001; 79(4):579-612, iv-v.
Score: 0.038
-
Feil EG, Glasgow RE, Boles S, McKay HG. Who participates in Internet-based self-management programs? A study among novice computer users in a primary care setting. Diabetes Educ. 2000 Sep-Oct; 26(5):806-11.
Score: 0.037
-
Glasgow RE, Fisher EB, Anderson BJ, LaGreca A, Marrero D, Johnson SB, Rubin RR, Cox DJ. Behavioral science in diabetes. Contributions and opportunities. Diabetes Care. 1999 May; 22(5):832-43.
Score: 0.033
-
Toobert DJ, Glasgow RE, Nettekoven LA, Brown JE. Behavioral and psychosocial effects of intensive lifestyle management for women with coronary heart disease. Patient Educ Couns. 1998 Nov; 35(3):177-88.
Score: 0.032
-
McKay HG, Feil EG, Glasgow RE, Brown JE. Feasibility and use of an Internet support service for diabetes self-management. Diabetes Educ. 1998 Mar-Apr; 24(2):174-9.
Score: 0.031
-
Glasgow RE, La Chance PA, Toobert DJ, Brown J, Hampson SE, Riddle MC. Long-term effects and costs of brief behavioural dietary intervention for patients with diabetes delivered from the medical office. Patient Educ Couns. 1997 Nov; 32(3):175-84.
Score: 0.030
-
Ruggiero L, Glasgow R, Dryfoos JM, Rossi JS, Prochaska JO, Orleans CT, Prokhorov AV, Rossi SR, Greene GW, Reed GR, Kelly K, Chobanian L, Johnson S. Diabetes self-management. Self-reported recommendations and patterns in a large population. Diabetes Care. 1997 Apr; 20(4):568-76.
Score: 0.029
-
Glasgow RE, Perry JD, Toobert DJ, Hollis JF. Brief assessments of dietary behavior in field settings. Addict Behav. 1996 Mar-Apr; 21(2):239-47.
Score: 0.027
-
Glasgow RE, Anderson BJ. Future directions for research on pediatric chronic disease management: lessons from diabetes. J Pediatr Psychol. 1995 Aug; 20(4):389-402.
Score: 0.026
-
Hampson SE, Glasgow RE, Foster LS. Personal models of diabetes among older adults: relationship to self-management and other variables. Diabetes Educ. 1995 Jul-Aug; 21(4):300-7.
Score: 0.026
-
Hampson SE, Glasgow RE, Zeiss AM. Personal models of osteoarthritis and their relation to self-management activities and quality of life. J Behav Med. 1994 Apr; 17(2):143-58.
Score: 0.024
-
Hessler D, Fisher L, Glasgow RE, Strycker LA, Dickinson LM, Arean PA, Masharani U. Reductions in regimen distress are associated with improved management and glycemic control over time. Diabetes Care. 2014; 37(3):617-24.
Score: 0.023
-
Hampson SE, Glasgow RE, Zeiss AM, Birskovich SF, Foster L, Lines A. Self-management of osteoarthritis. Arthritis Care Res. 1993 Mar; 6(1):17-22.
Score: 0.022
-
Hessler DM, Fisher L, Mullan JT, Glasgow RE, Masharani U. Patient age: a neglected factor when considering disease management in adults with type 2 diabetes. Patient Educ Couns. 2011 Nov; 85(2):154-9.
Score: 0.019
-
Hampson SE, Glasgow RE, Toobert DJ. Personal models of diabetes and their relations to self-care activities. Health Psychol. 1990; 9(5):632-46.
Score: 0.018
-
Fisher L, Glasgow RE, Mullan JT, Skaff MM, Polonsky WH. Development of a brief diabetes distress screening instrument. Ann Fam Med. 2008 May-Jun; 6(3):246-52.
Score: 0.016
-
Glasgow RE, Toobert DJ. Social environment and regimen adherence among type II diabetic patients. Diabetes Care. 1988 May; 11(5):377-86.
Score: 0.016
-
Ary DV, Toobert D, Wilson W, Glasgow RE. Patient perspective on factors contributing to nonadherence to diabetes regimen. Diabetes Care. 1986 Mar-Apr; 9(2):168-72.
Score: 0.013
-
Glasgow RE, McCaul KD, Schafer LC. Barriers to regimen adherence among persons with insulin-dependent diabetes. J Behav Med. 1986 Feb; 9(1):65-77.
Score: 0.013
-
Toobert DJ, Glasgow RE, Strycker LA, Barrera M, Radcliffe JL, Wander RC, Bagdade JD. Biologic and quality-of-life outcomes from the Mediterranean Lifestyle Program: a randomized clinical trial. Diabetes Care. 2003 Aug; 26(8):2288-93.
Score: 0.011
-
Schafer LC, Glasgow RE, McCaul KD. Increasing the adherence of diabetic adolescents. J Behav Med. 1982 Sep; 5(3):353-62.
Score: 0.011
-
Von Korff M, Glasgow RE, Sharpe M. Organising care for chronic illness. BMJ. 2002 Jul 13; 325(7355):92-4.
Score: 0.010
-
Stevens VJ, Glasgow RE, Hollis JF, Lichtenstein E, Vogt TM. A smoking-cessation intervention for hospital patients. Med Care. 1993 Jan; 31(1):65-72.
Score: 0.005
-
Wilson W, Ary DV, Biglan A, Glasgow RE, Toobert DJ, Campbell DR. Psychosocial predictors of self-care behaviors (compliance) and glycemic control in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 1986 Nov-Dec; 9(6):614-22.
Score: 0.004
|
Connection Strength
The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.
Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.
|