Connection
Russell Glasgow to Program Development
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Russell Glasgow has written about Program Development.
|
|
Connection Strength |
|
 |
|
 |
|
1.346 |
|
|
|
-
Sivaram S, Sanchez MA, Rimer BK, Samet JM, Glasgow RE. Implementation science in cancer prevention and control: a framework for research and programs in low- and middle-income countries. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2014 Nov; 23(11):2273-84.
Score: 0.404
-
Estabrooks PA, Glasgow RE. Translating effective clinic-based physical activity interventions into practice. Am J Prev Med. 2006 Oct; 31(4 Suppl):S45-56.
Score: 0.233
-
Glasgow RE, Hollis JF, McRae SG, Lando HA, LaChance P. Providing an integrated program of low intensity tobacco cessation services in a health maintenance organization. Health Educ Res. 1991 Mar; 6(1):87-99.
Score: 0.079
-
Glasgow RE, Hollis JF, Pettigrew L, Foster L, Givi MJ, Morrisette G. Implementing a year-long, worksite-based incentive program for smoking cessation. Am J Health Promot. 1991 Jan-Feb; 5(3):192-9.
Score: 0.078
-
Green LW, Glasgow RE, Atkins D, Stange K. Making evidence from research more relevant, useful, and actionable in policy, program planning, and practice slips "twixt cup and lip". Am J Prev Med. 2009 Dec; 37(6 Suppl 1):S187-91.
Score: 0.073
-
Glasgow RE, Christiansen S, Smith KS, Stevens VJ, Toobert DJ. Development and implementation of an integrated, multi-modality, user-centered interactive dietary change program. Health Educ Res. 2009 Jun; 24(3):461-71.
Score: 0.066
-
Feldstein AC, Glasgow RE. A practical, robust implementation and sustainability model (PRISM) for integrating research findings into practice. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2008 Apr; 34(4):228-43.
Score: 0.065
-
Brownson CA, Miller D, Crespo R, Neuner S, Thompson J, Wall JC, Emont S, Fazzone P, Fisher EB, Glasgow RE. A quality improvement tool to assess self-management support in primary care. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2007 Jul; 33(7):408-16.
Score: 0.061
-
Rabin BA, Brownson RC, Kerner JF, Glasgow RE. Methodologic challenges in disseminating evidence-based interventions to promote physical activity. Am J Prev Med. 2006 Oct; 31(4 Suppl):S24-34.
Score: 0.058
-
Barrera M, Toobert DJ, Angell KL, Glasgow RE, Mackinnon DP. Social support and social-ecological resources as mediators of lifestyle intervention effects for type 2 diabetes. J Health Psychol. 2006 May; 11(3):483-95.
Score: 0.057
-
Glasgow RE, Dzewaltowski DA, Estabrooks PA, Klesges LM, Bull SS. Response from the Behavior Change Consortium Representatives and Translation Work Group: the issue is one of impact, not of world view or preferred approach. Health Educ Res. 2002 Dec; 17(6):696-9.
Score: 0.045
-
Glasgow RE, Vogt TM, Boles SM. Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework. Am J Public Health. 1999 Sep; 89(9):1322-7.
Score: 0.036
-
Ruiz S, Brady TJ, Glasgow RE, Birkel R, Spafford M. Chronic condition self-management surveillance: what is and what should be measured? Prev Chronic Dis. 2014 Jun 19; 11:E103.
Score: 0.025
-
Chambers DA, Glasgow RE, Stange KC. The dynamic sustainability framework: addressing the paradox of sustainment amid ongoing change. Implement Sci. 2013 Oct 02; 8:117.
Score: 0.024
-
Dickinson WP, Glasgow RE, Fisher L, Dickinson LM, Christensen SM, Estabrooks PA, Miller BF. Use of a website to accomplish health behavior change: if you build it, will they come? And will it work if they do? J Am Board Fam Med. 2013 Mar-Apr; 26(2):168-76.
Score: 0.023
-
Toobert DJ, Strycker LA, Glasgow RE, Barrera M, Angell K. Effects of the mediterranean lifestyle program on multiple risk behaviors and psychosocial outcomes among women at risk for heart disease. Ann Behav Med. 2005 04; 29(2):128-37.
Score: 0.013
-
Stevens VJ, Glasgow RE, Hollis JF, Lichtenstein E, Vogt TM. A smoking-cessation intervention for hospital patients. Med Care. 1993 Jan; 31(1):65-72.
Score: 0.006
|
Connection Strength
The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.
Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.
|