 Connection
Lisa Bero to Research Support as Topic
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Lisa Bero has written about Research Support as Topic.
|
|
| |
Connection Strength |
|
 |
|
 |
| |
9.698 |
|
|
|
-
Fabbri A, Lai A, Grundy Q, Bero LA. The Influence of Industry Sponsorship on the Research Agenda: A Scoping Review. Am J Public Health. 2018 11; 108(11):e9-e16.
Score: 0.618
-
Fabbri A, Holland TJ, Bero LA. Food industry sponsorship of academic research: investigating commercial bias in the research agenda. Public Health Nutr. 2018 12; 21(18):3422-3430.
Score: 0.615
-
Lundh A, Lexchin J, Mintzes B, Schroll JB, Bero L. Industry sponsorship and research outcome: systematic review with meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med. 2018 10; 44(10):1603-1612.
Score: 0.614
-
Lundh A, Lexchin J, Mintzes B, Schroll JB, Bero L. Industry sponsorship and research outcome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 02 16; 2:MR000033.
Score: 0.553
-
Chartres N, Fabbri A, Bero LA. Association of Industry Sponsorship With Outcomes of Nutrition Studies: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Intern Med. 2016 Dec 01; 176(12):1769-1777.
Score: 0.545
-
Mandrioli D, Kearns CE, Bero LA. Relationship between Research Outcomes and Risk of Bias, Study Sponsorship, and Author Financial Conflicts of Interest in Reviews of the Effects of Artificially Sweetened Beverages on Weight Outcomes: A Systematic Review of Reviews. PLoS One. 2016; 11(9):e0162198.
Score: 0.536
-
Bero L, Anglemyer A, Vesterinen H, Krauth D. The relationship between study sponsorship, risks of bias, and research outcomes in atrazine exposure studies conducted in non-human animals: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Environ Int. 2016 Jul-Aug; 92-93:597-604.
Score: 0.509
-
Bero LA. Why the Cochrane risk of bias tool should include funding source as a standard item. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Dec 20; (12):ED000075.
Score: 0.444
-
Bero L. Industry sponsorship and research outcome: a Cochrane review. JAMA Intern Med. 2013 Apr 08; 173(7):580-1.
Score: 0.423
-
Lundh A, Sismondo S, Lexchin J, Busuioc OA, Bero L. Industry sponsorship and research outcome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Dec 12; 12:MR000033.
Score: 0.414
-
Nkansah N, Nguyen T, Iraninezhad H, Bero L. Randomized trials assessing calcium supplementation in healthy children: relationship between industry sponsorship and study outcomes. Public Health Nutr. 2009 Oct; 12(10):1931-7.
Score: 0.318
-
Bero L. "Experimental" institutional models for corporate funding of academic research: unknown effects on the research enterprise. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 Jul; 61(7):629-33.
Score: 0.304
-
Boyd EA, Bero LA. Defining financial conflicts and managing research relationships: an analysis of university conflict of interest committee decisions. Sci Eng Ethics. 2007 Dec; 13(4):415-35.
Score: 0.291
-
Bero L. [Shall we ban industrial funds for research?]. Epidemiol Prev. 2007 Jul-Aug; 31(4):171-4.
Score: 0.283
-
Hong MK, Bero LA. Tobacco industry sponsorship of a book and conflict of interest. Addiction. 2006 Aug; 101(8):1202-11.
Score: 0.266
-
Glaser BE, Bero LA. Attitudes of academic and clinical researchers toward financial ties in research: a systematic review. Sci Eng Ethics. 2005 Oct; 11(4):553-73.
Score: 0.251
-
Bero LA. Tobacco industry manipulation of research. Public Health Rep. 2005 Mar-Apr; 120(2):200-8.
Score: 0.241
-
Bero LA. Managing financial conflicts of interest in research. J Am Coll Dent. 2005; 72(2):4-9.
Score: 0.238
-
Malone RE, Bero LA. Chasing the dollar: why scientists should decline tobacco industry funding. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2003 Aug; 57(8):546-8.
Score: 0.216
-
Lexchin J, Bero LA, Davis C, Gagnon MA. Achieving greater independence from commercial influence in research. BMJ. 2021 03 09; 372:n370.
Score: 0.183
-
Boyd EA, Bero LA. Assessing faculty financial relationships with industry: A case study. JAMA. 2000 Nov 01; 284(17):2209-14.
Score: 0.179
-
Turner K, Carboni-Jim?nez A, Benea C, Elder K, Levis B, Boruff J, Roseman M, Bero L, Lexchin J, Turner EH, Benedetti A, Thombs BD. Reporting of drug trial funding sources and author financial conflicts of interest in Cochrane and non-Cochrane meta-analyses: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2020 05 11; 10(5):e035633.
Score: 0.173
-
Moynihan R, Bero L, Hill S, Johansson M, Lexchin J, Macdonald H, Mintzes B, Pearson C, Rodwin MA, Stavdal A, Stegenga J, Thombs BD, Thornton H, Vandvik PO, Wieseler B, Godlee F. Pathways to independence: towards producing and using trustworthy evidence. BMJ. 2019 Dec 03; 367:l6576.
Score: 0.168
-
Bero LA. Accepting commercial sponsorship. Disclosure helps--but is not a panacea. BMJ. 1999 Sep 11; 319(7211):653-4.
Score: 0.165
-
Chartres N, Fabbri A, McDonald S, Turton J, Allman-Farinelli M, McKenzie J, Bero L. Association of industry ties with outcomes of studies examining the effect of wholegrain foods on cardiovascular disease and mortality: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2019 05 19; 9(5):e022912.
Score: 0.161
-
Bero LA. Disclosure policies for gifts from industry to academic faculty. JAMA. 1998 Apr 01; 279(13):1031-2.
Score: 0.149
-
Bero L. Addressing Bias and Conflict of Interest Among Biomedical Researchers. JAMA. 2017 May 02; 317(17):1723-1724.
Score: 0.140
-
Barnes DE, Bero LA. Industry-funded research and conflict of interest: an analysis of research sponsored by the tobacco industry through the Center for Indoor Air Research. J Health Polit Policy Law. 1996; 21(3):515-42.
Score: 0.128
-
Cataldo JK, Bero LA, Malone RE. "A delicate diplomatic situation": tobacco industry efforts to gain control of the Framingham Study. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010 Aug; 63(8):841-53.
Score: 0.088
-
Yank V, Rennie D, Bero LA. Financial ties and concordance between results and conclusions in meta-analyses: retrospective cohort study. BMJ. 2007 Dec 08; 335(7631):1202-5.
Score: 0.073
-
Bero L, Oostvogel F, Bacchetti P, Lee K. Factors associated with findings of published trials of drug-drug comparisons: why some statins appear more efficacious than others. PLoS Med. 2007 Jun; 4(6):e184.
Score: 0.070
-
Lee KP, Boyd EA, Holroyd-Leduc JM, Bacchetti P, Bero LA. Predictors of publication: characteristics of submitted manuscripts associated with acceptance at major biomedical journals. Med J Aust. 2006 Jun 19; 184(12):621-6.
Score: 0.066
-
Boyd EA, Cho MK, Bero LA. Financial conflict-of-interest policies in clinical research: issues for clinical investigators. Acad Med. 2003 Aug; 78(8):769-74.
Score: 0.054
-
Lexchin J, Bero LA, Djulbegovic B, Clark O. Pharmaceutical industry sponsorship and research outcome and quality: systematic review. BMJ. 2003 May 31; 326(7400):1167-70.
Score: 0.053
-
Hong MK, Bero LA. How the tobacco industry responded to an influential study of the health effects of secondhand smoke. BMJ. 2002 Dec 14; 325(7377):1413-6.
Score: 0.052
-
Nejstgaard CH, Bero L, Hr?bjartsson A, J?rgensen AW, J?rgensen KJ, Le M, Lundh A. Association between conflicts of interest and favourable recommendations in clinical guidelines, advisory committee reports, opinion pieces, and narrative reviews: systematic review. BMJ. 2020 12 09; 371:m4234.
Score: 0.045
-
Bero LA, Rennie D. Influences on the quality of published drug studies. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1996; 12(2):209-37.
Score: 0.032
-
Roseman M, Milette K, Bero LA, Coyne JC, Lexchin J, Turner EH, Thombs BD. Reporting of conflicts of interest in meta-analyses of trials of pharmacological treatments. JAMA. 2011 Mar 09; 305(10):1008-17.
Score: 0.023
-
Schick SF, Bero LA, Cook DM. The tobacco industry and the Data Quality Act. Science. 2007 Aug 17; 317(5840):898.
Score: 0.018
|
Connection Strength
The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.
Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.
|