 Connection
Lisa Bero to Evidence-Based Medicine
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Lisa Bero has written about Evidence-Based Medicine.
|
|
| |
Connection Strength |
|
 |
|
 |
| |
4.736 |
|
|
|
-
Bero LA. Improving the Quality of Systematic Reviews in Public Health: Introduction to the Series. Am J Public Health. 2020 11; 110(11):1601-1602.
Score: 0.518
-
Bero LA. Producing Independent, Systematic Review Evidence: Cochrane's Response to COVID-19. Am J Public Health. 2020 07; 110(7):952-953.
Score: 0.502
-
Wang Z, Norris SL, Bero L. The advantages and limitations of guideline adaptation frameworks. Implement Sci. 2018 05 29; 13(1):72.
Score: 0.438
-
Norris SL, Bero L. GRADE Methods for Guideline Development: Time to Evolve? Ann Intern Med. 2016 Dec 06; 165(11):810-811.
Score: 0.390
-
Tovey D, Churchill R, Bero L. Evidence based medicine: looking forward and building on what we have learnt. BMJ. 2014 Jul 09; 349:g4508.
Score: 0.335
-
Odierna DH, White J, Forsyth S, Bero LA. Critical appraisal training increases understanding and confidence and enhances the use of evidence in diverse categories of learners. Health Expect. 2015 Apr; 18(2):273-87.
Score: 0.300
-
Jewell CJ, Bero LA. "Developing good taste in evidence": facilitators of and hindrances to evidence-informed health policymaking in state government. Milbank Q. 2008 Jun; 86(2):177-208.
Score: 0.219
-
Dickersin K, Straus SE, Bero LA. Evidence based medicine: increasing, not dictating, choice. BMJ. 2007 Jan 06; 334 Suppl 1:s10.
Score: 0.199
-
Wilkinson J, Heal C, Antoniou GA, Flemyng E, Alfirevic Z, Avenell A, Barbour G, Brown NJL, Carlisle J, Clarke M, Dicker P, Dumville JC, Grey A, Grohmann S, Gurrin L, Hayden JA, Heathers J, Hunter KE, Lasserson T, Lam E, Lensen S, Li T, Li W, Loder E, Lundh A, Meyerowitz-Katz G, Mol BW, O'Connell NE, Parker L, Redman BK, Seidler L, Sheldrick KA, Sydenham E, Torgerson D, van Wely M, Wang R, Bero L, Kirkham JJ. Protocol for the development of a tool (INSPECT-SR) to identify problematic randomised controlled trials in systematic reviews of health interventions. BMJ Open. 2024 03 11; 14(3):e084164.
Score: 0.164
-
Langford AV, Bero L, Lin CC, Blyth FM, Doctor JN, Holliday S, Jeon YH, Moullin JC, Murnion B, Nielsen S, Penm J, Reeve E, Reid S, Wale J, Osman R, Gnjidic D, Schneider CR. Context matters: using an Evidence to Decision (EtD) framework to develop and encourage uptake of opioid deprescribing guideline recommendations at the point-of-care. J Clin Epidemiol. 2024 Jan; 165:111204.
Score: 0.160
-
Dai Z, McKenzie JE, McDonald S, Baram L, Page MJ, Allman-Farinelli M, Raubenheimer D, Bero LA. Assessment of the Methods Used to Develop Vitamin D and Calcium Recommendations-A Systematic Review of Bone Health Guidelines. Nutrients. 2021 Jul 15; 13(7).
Score: 0.136
-
Wang Z, Bero L, Grundy Q. Understanding professional stakeholders' active resistance to guideline implementation: The case of Canadian breast screening guidelines. Soc Sci Med. 2021 01; 269:113586.
Score: 0.130
-
Chartres N, Grundy Q, Parker LM, Bero LA. "It's Not Smooth Sailing": Bridging the Gap Between Methods and Content Expertise in Public Health Guideline Development. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2020 08 01; 9(8):335-343.
Score: 0.127
-
Bero LA, Norris SL, Lawrence MA. Making nutrition guidelines fit for purpose. BMJ. 2019 Apr 16; 365:l1579.
Score: 0.116
-
Apollonio DE, Bero LA. Interpretation and use of evidence in state policymaking: a qualitative analysis. BMJ Open. 2017 02 20; 7(2):e012738.
Score: 0.100
-
Bero L. Systematic Review: A Method at Risk for Being Corrupted. Am J Public Health. 2017 Jan; 107(1):93-96.
Score: 0.099
-
Morgan RL, Thayer KA, Bero L, Bruce N, Falck-Ytter Y, Ghersi D, Guyatt G, Hooijmans C, Langendam M, Mandrioli D, Mustafa RA, Rehfuess EA, Rooney AA, Shea B, Silbergeld EK, Sutton P, Wolfe MS, Woodruff TJ, Verbeek JH, Holloway AC, Santesso N, Sch?nemann HJ. GRADE: Assessing the quality of evidence in environmental and occupational health. Environ Int. 2016 Jul-Aug; 92-93:611-6.
Score: 0.093
-
Alexander PE, Gionfriddo MR, Li SA, Bero L, Stoltzfus RJ, Neumann I, Brito JP, Djulbegovic B, Montori VM, Norris SL, Sch?nemann HJ, Thabane L, Guyatt GH. A number of factors explain why WHO guideline developers make strong recommendations inconsistent with GRADE guidance. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Feb; 70:111-22.
Score: 0.091
-
Alexander PE, Brito JP, Neumann I, Gionfriddo MR, Bero L, Djulbegovic B, Stoltzfus R, Montori VM, Norris SL, Sch?nemann HJ, Guyatt GH. World Health Organization strong recommendations based on low-quality evidence (study quality) are frequent and often inconsistent with GRADE guidance. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Apr; 72:98-106.
Score: 0.086
-
Alexander PE, Bero L, Montori VM, Brito JP, Stoltzfus R, Djulbegovic B, Neumann I, Rave S, Guyatt G. World Health Organization recommendations are often strong based on low confidence in effect estimates. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014 Jun; 67(6):629-34.
Score: 0.081
-
Odierna DH, Forsyth SR, White J, Bero LA. The cycle of bias in health research: a framework and toolbox for critical appraisal training. Account Res. 2013; 20(2):127-41.
Score: 0.075
-
Bero LA, Binder L. The Cochrane Collaboration review prioritization projects show that a variety of approaches successfully identify high-priority topics. J Clin Epidemiol. 2013 May; 66(5):472-3.
Score: 0.074
-
Bero LA, Ghersi D. Making systematic reviews global. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Feb 16; (8):ED000020.
Score: 0.066
-
Odierna DH, Bero LA. Systematic reviews reveal unrepresentative evidence for the development of drug formularies for poor and nonwhite populations. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Dec; 62(12):1268-78.
Score: 0.058
-
Blaxall M, Richardson R, Schoonees A, Metzendorf MI, Dur?o S, Naude C, Bero L, Farquhar C. Obesity intervention evidence synthesis: Where are the gaps and which should we address first? Obes Rev. 2024 Apr; 25(4):e13685.
Score: 0.040
-
Mowatt G, Shirran L, Grimshaw JM, Rennie D, Flanagin A, Yank V, MacLennan G, G?tzsche PC, Bero LA. Prevalence of honorary and ghost authorship in Cochrane reviews. JAMA. 2002 Jun 05; 287(21):2769-71.
Score: 0.036
-
Montini T, Mangurian C, Bero LA. Assessing the evidence submitted in the development of a workplace smoking regulation: the case of Maryland. Public Health Rep. 2002 May-Jun; 117(3):291-8.
Score: 0.036
-
Ober M, Shohara R, Rennie D, Yank V, Bero LA. The Criticism Management System for the Cochrane Library. Eval Health Prof. 2002 Mar; 25(1):98-115.
Score: 0.036
-
Johansson M, Bero L, Bonfill X, Bruschettini M, Garner S, Glenton C, Harris R, J?rgensen KJ, Levinson W, Lotfi T, Montori V, Meng DM, Sch?nemann H, Vaz Carneiro A, Woloshin S, Moynihan R. Cochrane Sustainable Healthcare: evidence for action on too much medicine. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 12 06; 12:ED000143.
Score: 0.030
|
Connection Strength
The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.
Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.
|