 Connection
Lisa Bero to Research Design
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Lisa Bero has written about Research Design.
|
|
| |
Connection Strength |
|
 |
|
 |
| |
5.689 |
|
|
|
-
Bero LA. Improving the Quality of Systematic Reviews in Public Health: Introduction to the Series. Am J Public Health. 2020 11; 110(11):1601-1602.
Score: 0.479
-
Dai Z, Kroeger CM, McDonald S, Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Allman-Farinelli M, Raubenheimer D, Bero L. Methodological quality of public health guideline recommendations on vitamin D and calcium : a systematic review protocol. BMJ Open. 2019 11 07; 9(11):e031840.
Score: 0.447
-
Baur X, Soskolne CL, Bero LA. How can the integrity of occupational and environmental health research be maintained in the presence of conflicting interests? Environ Health. 2019 11 04; 18(1):93.
Score: 0.447
-
Parker L, Grundy Q, Bero L. Interpreting evidence in general practice: Bias and conflicts of interest. Aust J Gen Pract. 2018 06; 47(6):337-340.
Score: 0.405
-
Bero L. Meta-research matters: Meta-spin cycles, the blindness of bias, and rebuilding trust. PLoS Biol. 2018 04; 16(4):e2005972.
Score: 0.400
-
Bero L. Getting the systematic review basics right helps clinical practice: 4 common pitfalls for systematic review authors to avoid. Br J Sports Med. 2019 Jan; 53(1):6-8.
Score: 0.392
-
Bero L. Systematic Review: A Method at Risk for Being Corrupted. Am J Public Health. 2017 Jan; 107(1):93-96.
Score: 0.364
-
Krauth D, Woodruff TJ, Bero L. Instruments for assessing risk of bias and other methodological criteria: Krauth et al. Respond. Environ Health Perspect. 2014 Mar; 122(3):A67.
Score: 0.302
-
Krauth D, Woodruff TJ, Bero L. Instruments for assessing risk of bias and other methodological criteria of published animal studies: a systematic review. Environ Health Perspect. 2013 Sep; 121(9):985-92.
Score: 0.287
-
Walleser S, Hill SR, Bero LA. Characteristics and quality of reporting of cluster randomized trials in children: reporting needs improvement. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Dec; 64(12):1331-40.
Score: 0.252
-
Page MJ, Sterne JAC, Boutron I, Hr?bjartsson A, Kirkham JJ, Li T, Lundh A, Mayo-Wilson E, McKenzie JE, Stewart LA, Sutton AJ, Bero L, Dunn AG, Dwan K, Elbers RG, Kanukula R, Meerpohl JJ, Turner EH, Higgins JPT. ROB-ME: a tool for assessing risk of bias due to missing evidence in systematic reviews with meta-analysis. BMJ. 2023 11 20; 383:e076754.
Score: 0.148
-
Kanukula R, McKenzie JE, Bero L, Dai Z, McDonald S, Kroeger CM, Korevaar E, Page MJ. Methods used to select results to include in meta-analyses of nutrition research: A meta-research study. J Clin Epidemiol. 2022 02; 142:171-183.
Score: 0.129
-
Helfer B, Leonardi-Bee J, Mundell A, Parr C, Ierodiakonou D, Garcia-Larsen V, Kroeger CM, Dai Z, Man A, Jobson J, Dewji F, Kunc M, Bero L, Boyle RJ. Conduct and reporting of formula milk trials: systematic review. BMJ. 2021 10 13; 375:n2202.
Score: 0.128
-
Soskolne CL, Kramer S, Ramos-Bonilla JP, Mandrioli D, Sass J, Gochfeld M, Cranor CF, Advani S, Bero LA. Toolkit for detecting misused epidemiological methods. Environ Health. 2021 08 19; 20(1):90.
Score: 0.127
-
Verbeek J, Hoving J, Boschman J, Chong LY, Livingstone-Banks J, Bero L. Systematic Reviews Should Consider Effects From Both the Population and the Individual Perspective. Am J Public Health. 2021 05; 111(5):820-825.
Score: 0.124
-
Dai Z, Kroeger CM, Lawrence M, Scrinis G, Bero L. Comparison of methodological quality between the 2007 and 2019 Canadian dietary guidelines. Public Health Nutr. 2020 11; 23(16):2879-2885.
Score: 0.117
-
Turner SL, Karahalios A, Forbes AB, Taljaard M, Grimshaw JM, Cheng AC, Bero L, McKenzie JE. Design characteristics and statistical methods used in interrupted time series studies evaluating public health interventions: a review. J Clin Epidemiol. 2020 06; 122:1-11.
Score: 0.114
-
Korevaar E, Karahalios A, Forbes AB, Turner SL, McDonald S, Taljaard M, Grimshaw JM, Cheng AC, Bero L, McKenzie JE. Methods used to meta-analyse results from interrupted time series studies: A methodological systematic review protocol. F1000Res. 2020; 9:110.
Score: 0.114
-
Turner SL, Karahalios A, Forbes AB, Taljaard M, Grimshaw JM, Cheng AC, Bero L, McKenzie JE. Design characteristics and statistical methods used in interrupted time series studies evaluating public health interventions: protocol for a review. BMJ Open. 2019 01 28; 9(1):e024096.
Score: 0.106
-
Rasmussen K, Bero L, Redberg R, G?tzsche PC, Lundh A. Collaboration between academics and industry in clinical trials: cross sectional study of publications and survey of lead academic authors. BMJ. 2018 Oct 03; 363:k3654.
Score: 0.104
-
Misakian AL, Bero LA. Publication bias and research on passive smoking: comparison of published and unpublished studies. JAMA. 1998 Jul 15; 280(3):250-3.
Score: 0.102
-
Bero LA, Grundy Q. Not All Influences on Science Are Conflicts of Interest. Am J Public Health. 2018 05; 108(5):632-633.
Score: 0.101
-
Fabbri A, Chartres N, Bero LA. Study sponsorship and the nutrition research agenda: analysis of cohort studies examining the association between nutrition and obesity. Public Health Nutr. 2017 Dec; 20(17):3193-3199.
Score: 0.096
-
Fabbri A, Chartres N, Scrinis G, Bero LA. Study sponsorship and the nutrition research agenda: analysis of randomized controlled trials included in systematic reviews of nutrition interventions to address obesity. Public Health Nutr. 2017 May; 20(7):1306-1313.
Score: 0.092
-
Mahady SE, Schlub T, Bero L, Moher D, Tovey D, George J, Craig JC. Side effects are incompletely reported among systematic reviews in gastroenterology. J Clin Epidemiol. 2015 Feb; 68(2):144-53.
Score: 0.078
-
Krle?a-Jeri? K, Lemmens T, Reveiz L, Cuervo LG, Bero LA. Prospective registration and results disclosure of clinical trials in the Americas: a roadmap toward transparency. Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2011 Jul; 30(1):87-96.
Score: 0.063
-
Rattinger G, Bero L. Factors associated with results and conclusions of trials of thiazolidinediones. PLoS One. 2009 Jun 08; 4(6):e5826.
Score: 0.054
-
Lee KP, Boyd EA, Holroyd-Leduc JM, Bacchetti P, Bero LA. Predictors of publication: characteristics of submitted manuscripts associated with acceptance at major biomedical journals. Med J Aust. 2006 Jun 19; 184(12):621-6.
Score: 0.044
-
Lawrence M, Naude C, Armstrong R, Bero L, Covic N, Durao S, Ghersi D, Macdonald G, MacLehose H, Margetts B, Tovey D, Volmink J, Young T. A call to action to reshape evidence synthesis and use for nutrition policy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Nov 21; 11:ED000118.
Score: 0.023
-
Cho MK, Bero LA. The quality of drug studies published in symposium proceedings. Ann Intern Med. 1996 Mar 01; 124(5):485-9.
Score: 0.022
-
Bero LA, Rennie D. Influences on the quality of published drug studies. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1996; 12(2):209-37.
Score: 0.021
-
Grimshaw J, McAuley LM, Bero LA, Grilli R, Oxman AD, Ramsay C, Vale L, Zwarenstein M. Systematic reviews of the effectiveness of quality improvement strategies and programmes. Qual Saf Health Care. 2003 Aug; 12(4):298-303.
Score: 0.009
|
Connection Strength
The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.
Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.
|