Connection
Lisa Bero to Periodicals as Topic
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Lisa Bero has written about Periodicals as Topic.
|
|
| |
Connection Strength |
|
 |
|
 |
| |
2.553 |
|
|
|
-
Grundy Q, Dunn AG, Bourgeois FT, Coiera E, Bero L. Prevalence of Disclosed Conflicts of Interest in Biomedical Research and Associations With Journal Impact Factors and Altmetric Scores. JAMA. 2018 01 23; 319(4):408-409.
Score: 0.466
-
Finley PR, Bero L. Clarification of study and citation. Arch Intern Med. 2007 Dec 10; 167(22):2531; author reply 2531-2.
Score: 0.231
-
Lee KP, Boyd EA, Holroyd-Leduc JM, Bacchetti P, Bero LA. Predictors of publication: characteristics of submitted manuscripts associated with acceptance at major biomedical journals. Med J Aust. 2006 Jun 19; 184(12):621-6.
Score: 0.208
-
Korfitsen CB, Van Beersel Krejcíková H, Nejstgaard CH, Boutron I, Bero L, Hróbjartsson A, Lundh A. Conflict of interest policies for editors and peer reviewers in medical journals: cross-sectional study. J Clin Epidemiol. 2025 Dec; 188:111980.
Score: 0.198
-
Lee KP, Schotland M, Bacchetti P, Bero LA. Association of journal quality indicators with methodological quality of clinical research articles. JAMA. 2002 Jun 05; 287(21):2805-8.
Score: 0.158
-
Wenger LD, Malone RE, George A, Bero LA. Cigar magazines: using tobacco to sell a lifestyle. Tob Control. 2001 Sep; 10(3):279-84.
Score: 0.149
-
Wenger L, Malone R, Bero L. The cigar revival and the popular press: a content analysis, 1987-1997. Am J Public Health. 2001 Feb; 91(2):288-91.
Score: 0.144
-
Benea C, Turner KA, Roseman M, Bero LA, Lexchin J, Turner EH, Thombs BD. Reporting of financial conflicts of interest in meta-analyses of drug trials published in high-impact medical journals: comparison of results from 2017 to 2018 and 2009. Syst Rev. 2020 04 08; 9(1):77.
Score: 0.136
-
Ding D, Nguyen B, Gebel K, Bauman A, Bero L. Duplicate and salami publication: a prevalence study of journal policies. Int J Epidemiol. 2020 02 01; 49(1):281-288.
Score: 0.134
-
Bero L. Getting the systematic review basics right helps clinical practice: 4 common pitfalls for systematic review authors to avoid. Br J Sports Med. 2019 Jan; 53(1):6-8.
Score: 0.115
-
Mandrioli D, Kearns CE, Bero LA. Relationship between Research Outcomes and Risk of Bias, Study Sponsorship, and Author Financial Conflicts of Interest in Reviews of the Effects of Artificially Sweetened Beverages on Weight Outcomes: A Systematic Review of Reviews. PLoS One. 2016; 11(9):e0162198.
Score: 0.106
-
Mahady SE, Schlub T, Bero L, Moher D, Tovey D, George J, Craig JC. Side effects are incompletely reported among systematic reviews in gastroenterology. J Clin Epidemiol. 2015 Feb; 68(2):144-53.
Score: 0.092
-
Glantz SA, Bero LA. Inappropriate and appropriate selection of 'peers' in grant review. JAMA. 1994 Jul 13; 272(2):114-6.
Score: 0.091
-
Bero LA, Galbraith A, Rennie D. The publication of sponsored symposiums in medical journals. N Engl J Med. 1992 Oct 15; 327(16):1135-40.
Score: 0.081
-
Rennie D, Bero LA. Throw it away, Sam: the controlled circulation journals. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1990 Oct; 155(4):889-92.
Score: 0.070
-
Bero LA, Glantz S, Hong MK. The limits of competing interest disclosures. Tob Control. 2005 Apr; 14(2):118-26.
Score: 0.048
-
Rochon PA, Bero LA, Bay AM, Gold JL, Dergal JM, Binns MA, Streiner DL, Gurwitz JH. Comparison of review articles published in peer-reviewed and throwaway journals. JAMA. 2002 Jun 05; 287(21):2853-6.
Score: 0.039
-
Montini T, Mangurian C, Bero LA. Assessing the evidence submitted in the development of a workplace smoking regulation: the case of Maryland. Public Health Rep. 2002 May-Jun; 117(3):291-8.
Score: 0.039
-
Barnes DE, Bero LA. Scientific quality of original research articles on environmental tobacco smoke. Tob Control. 1997; 6(1):19-26.
Score: 0.027
-
Bero LA, Galbraith A, Rennie D. Sponsored symposia on environmental tobacco smoke. JAMA. 1994 Feb 23; 271(8):612-7.
Score: 0.022
|
Connection Strength
The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.
Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.
|