 Connection
Lisa Bero to Bias
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Lisa Bero has written about Bias.
|
|
| |
Connection Strength |
|
 |
|
 |
| |
3.503 |
|
|
|
-
Bero L, Chartres N, Diong J, Fabbri A, Ghersi D, Lam J, Lau A, McDonald S, Mintzes B, Sutton P, Turton JL, Woodruff TJ. The risk of bias in observational studies of exposures (ROBINS-E) tool: concerns arising from application to observational studies of exposures. Syst Rev. 2018 12 21; 7(1):242.
Score: 0.569
-
Fox DM, Bero L. Systematic reviews: perhaps "the answer to policy makers' prayers"? Environ Health Perspect. 2014 Oct; 122(10):A262-3.
Score: 0.425
-
Krauth D, Woodruff TJ, Bero L. Instruments for assessing risk of bias and other methodological criteria: Krauth et al. Respond. Environ Health Perspect. 2014 Mar; 122(3):A67.
Score: 0.408
-
Krauth D, Woodruff TJ, Bero L. Instruments for assessing risk of bias and other methodological criteria of published animal studies: a systematic review. Environ Health Perspect. 2013 Sep; 121(9):985-92.
Score: 0.388
-
Odierna DH, Forsyth SR, White J, Bero LA. The cycle of bias in health research: a framework and toolbox for critical appraisal training. Account Res. 2013; 20(2):127-41.
Score: 0.376
-
Kanukula R, McKenzie JE, Bero L, Dai Z, McDonald S, Kroeger CM, Korevaar E, Forbes A, Page MJ. Investigation of bias due to selective inclusion of study effect estimates in meta-analyses of nutrition research. Res Synth Methods. 2024 Jul; 15(4):524-542.
Score: 0.203
-
Toews I, Anglemyer A, Nyirenda JL, Alsaid D, Balduzzi S, Grummich K, Schwingshackl L, Bero L. Healthcare outcomes assessed with observational study designs compared with those assessed in randomized trials: a meta-epidemiological study. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 01 04; 1:MR000034.
Score: 0.202
-
Taylor KW, Wang Z, Walker VR, Rooney AA, Bero LA. Using interactive data visualization to facilitate user selection and comparison of risk of bias tools for observational studies of exposures. Environ Int. 2020 09; 142:105806.
Score: 0.157
-
Bero L, Chiu K, Grundy Q. The SSSPIN study-spin in studies of spin: meta-research analysis. BMJ. 2019 Dec 18; 367:l6202.
Score: 0.152
-
Bero L. Meta-research matters: Meta-spin cycles, the blindness of bias, and rebuilding trust. PLoS Biol. 2018 04; 16(4):e2005972.
Score: 0.135
-
Walleser S, Hill SR, Bero LA. Characteristics and quality of reporting of cluster randomized trials in children: reporting needs improvement. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Dec; 64(12):1331-40.
Score: 0.085
-
Qureshi R, Naaman K, Quan NG, Mayo-Wilson E, Page MJ, Cornelius V, Chou R, Boutron I, Golder S, Bero L, Doshi P, Vassar M, Meursinge Reynders R, Li T. Development and Evaluation of a Framework for Identifying and Addressing Spin for Harms in Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Ann Intern Med. 2024 Aug; 177(8):1089-1098.
Score: 0.052
-
Page MJ, Sterne JAC, Boutron I, Hr?bjartsson A, Kirkham JJ, Li T, Lundh A, Mayo-Wilson E, McKenzie JE, Stewart LA, Sutton AJ, Bero L, Dunn AG, Dwan K, Elbers RG, Kanukula R, Meerpohl JJ, Turner EH, Higgins JPT. ROB-ME: a tool for assessing risk of bias due to missing evidence in systematic reviews with meta-analysis. BMJ. 2023 11 20; 383:e076754.
Score: 0.050
-
Hong MK, Bero LA. How the tobacco industry responded to an influential study of the health effects of secondhand smoke. BMJ. 2002 Dec 14; 325(7377):1413-6.
Score: 0.047
-
Korevaar E, Karahalios A, Turner SL, Forbes AB, Taljaard M, Cheng AC, Grimshaw JM, Bero L, McKenzie JE. Methodological systematic review recommends improvements to conduct and reporting when meta-analyzing interrupted time series studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 2022 05; 145:55-69.
Score: 0.044
-
Lexchin J, Bero LA, Davis C, Gagnon MA. Achieving greater independence from commercial influence in research. BMJ. 2021 03 09; 372:n370.
Score: 0.041
-
Nejstgaard CH, Bero L, Hr?bjartsson A, J?rgensen AW, J?rgensen KJ, Le M, Lundh A. Association between conflicts of interest and favourable recommendations in clinical guidelines, advisory committee reports, opinion pieces, and narrative reviews: systematic review. BMJ. 2020 12 09; 371:m4234.
Score: 0.041
-
Nejstgaard CH, Bero L, Hr?bjartsson A, J?rgensen AW, J?rgensen KJ, Le M, Lundh A. Conflicts of interest in clinical guidelines, advisory committee reports, opinion pieces, and narrative reviews: associations with recommendations. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 12 08; 12:MR000040.
Score: 0.041
-
Pega F, Norris SL, Backes C, Bero LA, Descatha A, Gagliardi D, Godderis L, Loney T, Modenese A, Morgan RL, Pachito D, Paulo MBS, Scheepers PTJ, Schl?nssen V, Sgargi D, Silbergeld EK, S?rensen K, Sutton P, Tenkate T, Torre?o Corr?a da Silva D, Ujita Y, van Deventer E, Woodruff TJ, Mandrioli D. RoB-SPEO: A tool for assessing risk of bias in studies estimating the prevalence of exposure to occupational risk factors from the WHO/ILO Joint Estimates of the Work-related Burden of Disease and Injury. Environ Int. 2020 02; 135:105039.
Score: 0.038
-
Elliott JH, Grimshaw J, Altman R, Bero L, Goodman SN, Henry D, Macleod M, Tovey D, Tugwell P, White H, Sim I. Informatics: Make sense of health data. Nature. 2015 Nov 05; 527(7576):31-2.
Score: 0.029
-
Dhruva SS, Bero LA, Redberg RF. Strength of study evidence examined by the FDA in premarket approval of cardiovascular devices. JAMA. 2009 Dec 23; 302(24):2679-85.
Score: 0.019
|
Connection Strength
The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.
Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.
|