Colorado PROFILES, The Colorado Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute (CCTSI)
Keywords
Last Name
Institution

Contact Us
If you have any questions or feedback please contact us.

Connection

Lisa Bero to Research

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Lisa Bero has written about Research.

 
Connection Strength
 
 
 
1.584
 
  1. Fabbri A, Chartres N, Bero LA. Study sponsorship and the nutrition research agenda: analysis of cohort studies examining the association between nutrition and obesity. Public Health Nutr. 2017 Dec; 20(17):3193-3199.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.479
  2. Bero LA. Tobacco industry manipulation of research. Public Health Rep. 2005 Mar-Apr; 120(2):200-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.201
  3. Bero LA. Managing financial conflicts of interest in research. J Am Coll Dent. 2005; 72(2):4-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.199
  4. Kennedy GE, Bero LA. Print media coverage of research on passive smoking. Tob Control. 1999; 8(3):254-60.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.131
  5. Bero LA, Grilli R, Grimshaw JM, Harvey E, Oxman AD, Thomson MA. Closing the gap between research and practice: an overview of systematic reviews of interventions to promote the implementation of research findings. The Cochrane Effective Practice and Organization of Care Review Group. BMJ. 1998 Aug 15; 317(7156):465-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.128
  6. Bero L, Grundy Q. Conflicts of Interest in Nutrition Research. JAMA. 2018 07 03; 320(1):93-94.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.127
  7. Bero L, Barnes DE, Hanauer P, Slade J, Glantz SA. Lawyer control of the tobacco industry's external research program. The Brown and Williamson documents. JAMA. 1995 Jul 19; 274(3):241-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.103
  8. Lexchin J, Bero LA, Djulbegovic B, Clark O. Pharmaceutical industry sponsorship and research outcome and quality: systematic review. BMJ. 2003 May 31; 326(7400):1167-70.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.045
  9. Montini T, Bero LA. Policy makers' perspectives on tobacco control advocates' roles in regulation development. Tob Control. 2001 Sep; 10(3):218-24.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  10. Wang Z, Bero L, Grundy Q. Understanding professional stakeholders' active resistance to guideline implementation: The case of Canadian breast screening guidelines. Soc Sci Med. 2021 01; 269:113586.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  11. Barnes DE, Bero LA. Scientific quality of original research articles on environmental tobacco smoke. Tob Control. 1997; 6(1):19-26.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  12. Rennie D, Bero LA. Throw it away, Sam: the controlled circulation journals. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1990 Oct; 155(4):889-92.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  13. Steinman MA, Bero LA, Chren MM, Landefeld CS. Narrative review: the promotion of gabapentin: an analysis of internal industry documents. Ann Intern Med. 2006 Aug 15; 145(4):284-93.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  14. Granados A, Jonsson E, Banta HD, Bero L, Bonair A, Cochet C, Freemantle N, Grilli R, Grimshaw J, Harvey E, Levi R, Marshall D, Oxman A, Pasart L, R?is?nen V, Rius E, Espinas JA. EUR-ASSESS Project Subgroup Report on Dissemination and Impact. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1997; 13(2):220-86.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  15. Glantz SA, Barnes DE, Bero L, Hanauer P, Slade J. Looking through a keyhole at the tobacco industry. The Brown and Williamson documents. JAMA. 1995 Jul 19; 274(3):219-24.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  16. Slade J, Bero LA, Hanauer P, Barnes DE, Glantz SA. Nicotine and addiction. The Brown and Williamson documents. JAMA. 1995 Jul 19; 274(3):225-33.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  17. Hanauer P, Slade J, Barnes DE, Bero L, Glantz SA. Lawyer control of internal scientific research to protect against products liability lawsuits. The Brown and Williamson documents. JAMA. 1995 Jul 19; 274(3):234-40.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  18. Barnes DE, Hanauer P, Slade J, Bero LA, Glantz SA. Environmental tobacco smoke. The Brown and Williamson documents. JAMA. 1995 Jul 19; 274(3):248-53.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.

Copyright © 2024 The Regents of the University of Colorado, a body corporate. All rights reserved. (Harvard PROFILES RNS software version: 2.11.1)