 Connection
Anna Duloy to Colonic Polyps
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Anna Duloy has written about Colonic Polyps.
|
|
| |
Connection Strength |
|
 |
|
 |
| |
3.361 |
|
|
|
-
Keswani RN, Kahi CJ, Benson M, Gawron AJ, Kaltenbach TR, Yadlapati RH, Gregory DL, Duloy A. Cecal retroflexion is infrequently performed in routine practice and the retroflexed view is of poor quality. BMC Gastroenterol. 2021 Jul 31; 21(1):307.
Score: 0.667
-
Duloy AM, Keswani RN. Assessing the Quality of Polypectomy and Teaching Polypectomy. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2019 Oct; 29(4):587-601.
Score: 0.577
-
Keswani RN, Benson M, Beveridge C, Gawron AJ, Gluskin AB, Kahi CJ, Kaltenbach TR, McClure J, Schenck R, Yadlapati RH, Duloy A. Colonoscopy-Na?ve Raters Can Be Trained to Assess Colonoscopy Quality. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 04; 18(4):989-991.e1.
Score: 0.576
-
Duloy AM, Kaltenbach TR, Wood M, Gregory DL, Keswani RN. Colon polypectomy report card improves polypectomy competency: results of a prospective quality improvement study (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2019 06; 89(6):1212-1221.
Score: 0.564
-
Duloy AM, Kaltenbach TR, Keswani RN. Assessing colon polypectomy competency and its association with established quality metrics. Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Mar; 87(3):635-644.
Score: 0.509
-
Lam AY, Duloy AM, Keswani RN. Quality Indicators for the Detection and Removal of Colorectal Polyps and Interventions to Improve Them. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2022 Apr; 32(2):329-349.
Score: 0.173
-
Muething L, Wani S, Hall M, Simon V, Ezekwe E, Nguyen-Vu T, Malvar C, Duloy A, Kaltenbach T, Keswani R, Patel SG. Adding efficiency to proficiency: a study of trainee polypectomy efficiency metrics. Endoscopy. 2020 12; 52(12):1122-1126.
Score: 0.155
-
Patel SG, Duloy A, Kaltenbach T, Hall M, Kahi C, Pohl H, Rastogi A, Hammad H, Soetikno R, Shergill A, Simon V, Nguyen T, Ezekwe E, Ahi T, Keswani RN, Wani S. Development and validation of a video-based cold snare polypectomy assessment tool (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2019 06; 89(6):1222-1230.e2.
Score: 0.141
|
Connection Strength
The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.
Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.
|