 Connection
Laura Dee to Conservation of Natural Resources
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Laura Dee has written about Conservation of Natural Resources.
|
|
| |
Connection Strength |
|
 |
|
 |
| |
6.356 |
|
|
|
-
Kaiser A, Resasco J, Dee LE. Synthetic control methods enable stronger causal inference using participatory science data in cities. Nat Ecol Evol. 2026 06; 10(6):1204-1215.
Score: 0.850
-
Dee LE, Miller SJ, Helmstedt KJ, Boersma KS, Polasky S, Reich PB. Quantifying disturbance effects on ecosystem services in a changing climate. Nat Ecol Evol. 2025 Mar; 9(3):436-447.
Score: 0.781
-
Van Cleemput E, Adler PB, Suding KN, Rebelo AJ, Poulter B, Dee LE. Scaling-up ecological understanding with remote sensing and causal inference. Trends Ecol Evol. 2025 Feb; 40(2):122-135.
Score: 0.764
-
Van Kleunen LB, Peterson KA, Hayden MT, Keyes A, Schwartz AJ, Li H, Dee LE. Decision-making under uncertainty for species introductions into ecological networks. Ecol Lett. 2023 Jun; 26(6):983-1004.
Score: 0.685
-
Felipe-Lucia MR, Guerrero AM, Alexander SM, Ashander J, Baggio JA, Barnes ML, Bodin Ö, Bonn A, Fortin MJ, Friedman RS, Gephart JA, Helmstedt KJ, Keyes AA, Kroetz K, Massol F, Pocock MJO, Sayles J, Thompson RM, Wood SA, Dee LE. Conceptualizing ecosystem services using social-ecological networks. Trends Ecol Evol. 2022 03; 37(3):211-222.
Score: 0.627
-
Dee LE, De Lara M, Costello C, Gaines SD. To what extent can ecosystem services motivate protecting biodiversity? Ecol Lett. 2017 08; 20(8):935-946.
Score: 0.459
-
Dee LE, Thompson R, Massol F, Guerrero A, Bohan DA. Do Social-Ecological Syndromes Predict Outcomes for Ecosystem Services? - a Reply to Bodin et al. Trends Ecol Evol. 2017 08; 32(8):549-552.
Score: 0.458
-
Dee LE, Allesina S, Bonn A, Eklöf A, Gaines SD, Hines J, Jacob U, McDonald-Madden E, Possingham H, Schröter M, Thompson RM. Operationalizing Network Theory for Ecosystem Service Assessments. Trends Ecol Evol. 2017 02; 32(2):118-130.
Score: 0.439
-
Lynch AJ, Ashander JD, Ciocco TW, Cravens AE, Dassow CJ, Dee LE, Dunham JB, Eaton MJ, Embke HS, Hennessy J, Latzka AW, Lawrence DJ, Littell JS, Miller BW, Palasti LA, Runge MC, Sass GG, Shultz AD, Siegel KJ, Svancara LK, Thompson LM, Thurman LL, Valler JB, Weiskopf SR, Yocum HM. RAD (Resist-Accept-Direct) switch points and triggers for adaptation planning. J Environ Manage. 2025 Sep; 392:126419.
Score: 0.201
-
Siegel KJ, Cavanaugh KC, Dee LE. Balancing multiple management objectives as climate change transforms ecosystems. Trends Ecol Evol. 2024 04; 39(4):381-395.
Score: 0.179
-
Cazzolla Gatti R, Reich PB, Gamarra JGP, Crowther T, Hui C, Morera A, Bastin JF, de-Miguel S, Nabuurs GJ, Svenning JC, Serra-Diaz JM, Merow C, Enquist B, Kamenetsky M, Lee J, Zhu J, Fang J, Jacobs DF, Pijanowski B, Banerjee A, Giaquinto RA, Alberti G, Almeyda Zambrano AM, Alvarez-Davila E, Araujo-Murakami A, Avitabile V, Aymard GA, Balazy R, Baraloto C, Barroso JG, Bastian ML, Birnbaum P, Bitariho R, Bogaert J, Bongers F, Bouriaud O, Brancalion PHS, Brearley FQ, Broadbent EN, Bussotti F, Castro da Silva W, César RG, Ce?ljar G, Chama Moscoso V, Chen HYH, Cienciala E, Clark CJ, Coomes DA, Dayanandan S, Decuyper M, Dee LE, Del Aguila Pasquel J, Derroire G, Djuikouo MNK, Van Do T, Dolezal J, Ðordevic IÐ, Engel J, Fayle TM, Feldpausch TR, Fridman JK, Harris DJ, Hemp A, Hengeveld G, Herault B, Herold M, Ibanez T, Jagodzinski AM, Jaroszewicz B, Jeffery KJ, Johannsen VK, Jucker T, Kangur A, Karminov VN, Kartawinata K, Kennard DK, Kepfer-Rojas S, Keppel G, Khan ML, Khare PK, Kileen TJ, Kim HS, Korjus H, Kumar A, Kumar A, Laarmann D, Labrière N, Lang M, Lewis SL, Lukina N, Maitner BS, Malhi Y, Marshall AR, Martynenko OV, Monteagudo Mendoza AL, Ontikov PV, Ortiz-Malavasi E, Pallqui Camacho NC, Paquette A, Park M, Parthasarathy N, Peri PL, Petronelli P, Pfautsch S, Phillips OL, Picard N, Piotto D, Poorter L, Poulsen JR, Pretzsch H, Ramírez-Angulo H, Restrepo Correa Z, Rodeghiero M, Rojas Gonzáles RDP, Rolim SG, Rovero F, Rutishauser E, Saikia P, Salas-Eljatib C, Schepaschenko D, Scherer-Lorenzen M, ?eben V, Silveira M, Slik F, Sonké B, Souza AF, Sterenczak KJ, Svoboda M, Taedoumg H, Tchebakova N, Terborgh J, Tikhonova E, Torres-Lezama A, van der Plas F, Vásquez R, Viana H, Vibrans AC, Vilanova E, Vos VA, Wang HF, Westerlund B, White LJT, Wiser SK, Zawila-Niedzwiecki T, Zemagho L, Zhu ZX, Zo-Bi IC, Liang J. The number of tree species on Earth. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 02 08; 119(6).
Score: 0.158
-
Dee LE, Keyes AA. Analyzing ecosystem services as part of ecological networks in three salt marsh ecosystems. Ecology. 2022 03; 103(3):e3609.
Score: 0.158
-
O'Connor MI, Mori AS, Gonzalez A, Dee LE, Loreau M, Avolio M, Byrnes JEK, Cheung W, Cowles J, Clark AT, Hautier Y, Hector A, Komatsu K, Newbold T, Outhwaite CL, Reich PB, Seabloom E, Williams L, Wright A, Isbell F. Grand challenges in biodiversity-ecosystem functioning research in the era of science-policy platforms require explicit consideration of feedbacks. Proc Biol Sci. 2021 10 13; 288(1960):20210783.
Score: 0.154
-
Jacob U, Beckerman A, Antonijevic M, Dee LE, Eklöf A, Possingham HP, Thompson R, Webb TJ, Halpern BS. Marine conservation: towards a multi-layered network approach. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2020 12 21; 375(1814):20190459.
Score: 0.145
-
Dee LE, Cowles J, Isbell F, Pau S, Gaines SD, Reich PB. When Do Ecosystem Services Depend on Rare Species? Trends Ecol Evol. 2019 08; 34(8):746-758.
Score: 0.131
-
Runting RK, Bryan BA, Dee LE, Maseyk FJ, Mandle L, Hamel P, Wilson KA, Yetka K, Possingham HP, Rhodes JR. Incorporating climate change into ecosystem service assessments and decisions: a review. Glob Chang Biol. 2017 01; 23(1):28-41.
Score: 0.108
-
Xiao H, McDonald-Madden E, Sabbadin R, Peyrard N, Dee LE, Chadès I. The value of understanding feedbacks from ecosystem functions to species for managing ecosystems. Nat Commun. 2019 08 29; 10(1):3901.
Score: 0.033
-
Boersma KS, Dee LE, Miller SJ, Bogan MT, Lytle DA, Gitelman AI. Linking multidimensional functional diversity to quantitative methods: a graphical hypothesis--evaluation framework. Ecology. 2016 Mar; 97(3):583-93.
Score: 0.026
|
Connection Strength
The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.
Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.
|