 Connection
Co-Authors
This is a "connection" page, showing publications co-authored by Jodi Holtrop and Russell Glasgow.
|
|
| |
Connection Strength |
|
 |
|
 |
| |
3.835 |
|
|
|
-
Holtrop JS, Estabrooks PA, Gaglio B, Harden SM, Kessler RS, King DK, Kwan BM, Ory MG, Rabin BA, Shelton RC, Glasgow RE. Understanding and applying the RE-AIM framework: Clarifications and resources. J Clin Transl Sci. 2021; 5(1):e126.
Score: 0.779
-
Holtrop JS, Rabin BA, Glasgow RE. Dissemination and Implementation Science in Primary Care Research and Practice: Contributions and Opportunities. J Am Board Fam Med. 2018 May-Jun; 31(3):466-478.
Score: 0.631
-
Holtrop JS, Rabin BA, Glasgow RE. Qualitative approaches to use of the RE-AIM framework: rationale and methods. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 03 13; 18(1):177.
Score: 0.625
-
Holtrop JS, Hall TL, Rubinson C, Dickinson LM, Glasgow RE. What Makes for Successful Registry Implementation: A Qualitative Comparative Analysis. J Am Board Fam Med. 2017 Sep-Oct; 30(5):657-665.
Score: 0.602
-
Gomes R, Nederveld A, Glasgow RE, Studts JL, Holtrop JS. Lung cancer screening in rural primary care practices in Colorado: time for a more team-based approach? BMC Prim Care. 2023 03 03; 24(1):62.
Score: 0.221
-
Glasgow RE, Battaglia C, McCreight M, Ayele R, Maw AM, Fort MP, Holtrop JS, Gomes RN, Rabin BA. Use of the reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance (RE-AIM) framework to guide iterative adaptations: Applications, lessons learned, and future directions. Front Health Serv. 2022; 2:959565.
Score: 0.215
-
Holtrop JS, Nederveld A, Lum HD, Glasgow RE, Gomes R. Values and Meaning in Rural Primary Care Practices: Implications for Interventions Within Context. J Prim Care Community Health. 2022 Jan-Dec; 13:21501319221139371.
Score: 0.203
-
Holtrop JS, Scherer LD, Matlock DD, Glasgow RE, Green LA. The Importance of Mental Models in Implementation Science. Front Public Health. 2021; 9:680316.
Score: 0.197
-
Hall TL, Holtrop JS, Dickinson LM, Glasgow RE. Understanding adaptations to patient-centered medical home activities: The PCMH adaptations model. Transl Behav Med. 2017 12; 7(4):861-872.
Score: 0.153
-
Ritchie ND, Gurfinkel D, Sajatovic M, Carter M, Glasgow RE, Holtrop JS, Waxmonsky JA, Kwan BM. A Multi-Method Study of Patient Reach and Attendance in a Pragmatic Trial of Diabetes Shared Medical Appointments. Clin Diabetes. 2023; 41(4):526-538.
Score: 0.057
-
Kwan BM, Dickinson LM, Glasgow RE, Sajatovic M, Gritz M, Holtrop JS, Nease DE, Ritchie N, Nederveld A, Gurfinkel D, Waxmonsky JA. Correction to: The Invested in Diabetes Study Protocol: a cluster randomized pragmatic trial comparing standardized and patient-driven diabetes shared medical appointments. Trials. 2020 Feb 18; 21(1):195.
Score: 0.045
-
Kwan BM, Dickinson LM, Glasgow RE, Sajatovic M, Gritz M, Holtrop JS, Nease DE, Ritchie N, Nederveld A, Gurfinkel D, Waxmonsky JA. The Invested in Diabetes Study Protocol: a cluster randomized pragmatic trial comparing standardized and patient-driven diabetes shared medical appointments. Trials. 2020 Jan 10; 21(1):65.
Score: 0.044
-
Fernald DH, Dickinson LM, Froshaug DB, Balasubramanian BA, Holtrop JS, Krist AH, Glasgow RE, Green LA. Improving multiple health risk behaviors in primary care: lessons from the Prescription for Health Common Measures, Better Outcomes (COMBO) study. J Am Board Fam Med. 2012 Sep-Oct; 25(5):701-11.
Score: 0.027
-
Fernald DH, Froshaug DB, Dickinson LM, Balasubramanian BA, Dodoo MS, Holtrop JS, Hung DY, Glasgow RE, Niebauer LJ, Green LA. Common measures, better outcomes (COMBO): a field test of brief health behavior measures in primary care. Am J Prev Med. 2008 Nov; 35(5 Suppl):S414-22.
Score: 0.020
-
Woolf SH, Glasgow RE, Krist A, Bartz C, Flocke SA, Holtrop JS, Rothemich SF, Wald ER. Putting it together: finding success in behavior change through integration of services. Ann Fam Med. 2005 Jul-Aug; 3 Suppl 2:S20-7.
Score: 0.016
|
Connection Strength
The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.
Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.
|