Connection
Tin Su to Animals
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Tin Su has written about Animals.
|
|
Connection Strength |
|
 |
|
 |
|
1.120 |
|
|
|
-
Brown J, Su TT. E2F1, DIAP1, and the presence of a homologous chromosome promote while JNK inhibits radiation-induced loss of heterozygosity in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 2024 01 03; 226(1).
Score: 0.051
-
Ledru M, Clark CA, Brown J, Verghese S, Ferrara S, Goodspeed A, Su TT. Differential gene expression analysis identified determinants of cell fate plasticity during radiation-induced regeneration in Drosophila. PLoS Genet. 2022 01; 18(1):e1009989.
Score: 0.045
-
Brown J, Bush I, Bozon J, Su TT. Cells with loss-of-heterozygosity after exposure to ionizing radiation in Drosophila are culled by p53-dependent and p53-independent mechanisms. PLoS Genet. 2020 10; 16(10):e1009056.
Score: 0.041
-
Su TT. Non-apoptotic roles of apoptotic proteases: new tricks for an old dog. Open Biol. 2020 08; 10(8):200130.
Score: 0.041
-
Myat MM, Louis D, Mavrommatis A, Collins L, Mattis J, Ledru M, Verghese S, Su TT. Regulators of cell movement during development and regeneration in Drosophila. Open Biol. 2019 05 31; 9(5):180245.
Score: 0.037
-
Su TT. Drug screening in Drosophila; why, when, and when not? Wiley Interdiscip Rev Dev Biol. 2019 11; 8(6):e346.
Score: 0.037
-
Su TT. What Drosophila Can Teach Us About Radiation Biology of Human Cancers. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2019; 1167:225-236.
Score: 0.036
-
Su TT. Cellular plasticity, caspases and autophagy; that which does not kill us, well, makes us different. Open Biol. 2018 11 28; 8(11).
Score: 0.036
-
Verghese S, Su TT. Ionizing radiation induces stem cell-like properties in a caspase-dependent manner in Drosophila. PLoS Genet. 2018 11; 14(11):e1007659.
Score: 0.036
-
Duronio RJ, O'Farrell PH, Sluder G, Su TT. Sophisticated lessons from simple organisms: appreciating the value of curiosity-driven research. Dis Model Mech. 2017 12 19; 10(12):1381-1389.
Score: 0.034
-
Verghese S, Su TT. STAT, Wingless, and Nurf-38 determine the accuracy of regeneration after radiation damage in Drosophila. PLoS Genet. 2017 Oct; 13(10):e1007055.
Score: 0.033
-
Su T, Ludwig MZ, Xu J, Fehon RG. Kibra and Merlin Activate the Hippo Pathway Spatially Distinct from and Independent of Expanded. Dev Cell. 2017 03 13; 40(5):478-490.e3.
Score: 0.032
-
Verghese S, Su TT. Drosophila Wnt and STAT Define Apoptosis-Resistant Epithelial Cells for Tissue Regeneration after Irradiation. PLoS Biol. 2016 09; 14(9):e1002536.
Score: 0.031
-
Bilak A, Uyetake L, Su TT. Dying cells protect survivors from radiation-induced cell death in Drosophila. PLoS Genet. 2014 Mar; 10(3):e1004220.
Score: 0.026
-
van Bergeijk P, Heimiller J, Uyetake L, Su TT. Genome-wide expression analysis identifies a modulator of ionizing radiation-induced p53-independent apoptosis in Drosophila melanogaster. PLoS One. 2012; 7(5):e36539.
Score: 0.023
-
Gladstone M, Frederick B, Zheng D, Edwards A, Yoon P, Stickel S, DeLaney T, Chan DC, Raben D, Su TT. A translation inhibitor identified in a Drosophila screen enhances the effect of ionizing radiation and taxol in mammalian models of cancer. Dis Model Mech. 2012 May; 5(3):342-50.
Score: 0.023
-
Gladstone M, Su TT. Radiation responses and resistance. Int Rev Cell Mol Biol. 2012; 299:235-53.
Score: 0.022
-
Su TT. Safeguarding genetic information in Drosophila. Chromosoma. 2011 Dec; 120(6):547-55.
Score: 0.022
-
Gladstone M, Su TT. Chemical genetics and drug screening in Drosophila cancer models. J Genet Genomics. 2011 Oct 20; 38(10):497-504.
Score: 0.022
-
Edwards A, Gladstone M, Yoon P, Raben D, Frederick B, Su TT. Combinatorial effect of maytansinol and radiation in Drosophila and human cancer cells. Dis Model Mech. 2011 Jul; 4(4):496-503.
Score: 0.021
-
Gladstone M, Su TT. Screening for radiation sensitizers of Drosophila checkpoint mutants. Methods Mol Biol. 2011; 782:105-17.
Score: 0.021
-
Su TT. Heterochromatin replication: better late than ever. Curr Biol. 2010 Dec 07; 20(23):R1018-20.
Score: 0.021
-
Wichmann A, Uyetake L, Su TT. E2F1 and E2F2 have opposite effects on radiation-induced p53-independent apoptosis in Drosophila. Dev Biol. 2010 Oct 01; 346(1):80-9.
Score: 0.020
-
Su TT. The effect of a DNA damaging agent on embryonic cell cycles of the cnidarian Hydractinia echinata. PLoS One. 2010 Jul 23; 5(7):e11760.
Score: 0.020
-
Garcia K, Stumpff J, Duncan T, Su TT. Tyrosines in the kinesin-5 head domain are necessary for phosphorylation by Wee1 and for mitotic spindle integrity. Curr Biol. 2009 Oct 13; 19(19):1670-6.
Score: 0.019
-
Bilak A, Su TT. Regulation of Drosophila melanogaster pro-apoptotic gene hid. Apoptosis. 2009 Aug; 14(8):943-9.
Score: 0.019
-
Garcia K, Su TT. Cell cycle regulation. Fly (Austin). 2008 May-Jun; 2(3):133-7.
Score: 0.017
-
Jaklevic B, Uyetake L, Wichmann A, Bilak A, English CN, Su TT. Modulation of ionizing radiation-induced apoptosis by bantam microRNA in Drosophila. Dev Biol. 2008 Aug 01; 320(1):122-30.
Score: 0.017
-
Garcia K, Wichmann A, Su TT. Cell cycle regulation. Fly (Austin). 2007 Mar-Apr; 1(2):125-31.
Score: 0.016
-
Garcia K, Duncan T, Su TT. Analysis of the cell division cycle in Drosophila. Methods. 2007 Feb; 41(2):198-205.
Score: 0.016
-
Wichmann A, Jaklevic B, Su TT. Ionizing radiation induces caspase-dependent but Chk2- and p53-independent cell death in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Jun 27; 103(26):9952-7.
Score: 0.015
-
Su TT. Cellular responses to DNA damage: one signal, multiple choices. Annu Rev Genet. 2006; 40:187-208.
Score: 0.015
-
Stumpff J, Kellogg DR, Krohne KA, Su TT. Drosophila Wee1 interacts with members of the gammaTURC and is required for proper mitotic-spindle morphogenesis and positioning. Curr Biol. 2005 Sep 06; 15(17):1525-34.
Score: 0.014
-
Purdy A, Uyetake L, Cordeiro MG, Su TT. Regulation of mitosis in response to damaged or incompletely replicated DNA require different levels of Grapes (Drosophila Chk1). J Cell Sci. 2005 Aug 01; 118(Pt 15):3305-15.
Score: 0.014
-
Stumpff J, Duncan T, Homola E, Campbell SD, Su TT. Drosophila Wee1 kinase regulates Cdk1 and mitotic entry during embryogenesis. Curr Biol. 2004 Dec 14; 14(23):2143-8.
Score: 0.014
-
Duncan T, Su TT. Embryogenesis: coordinating cell division with gastrulation. Curr Biol. 2004 Apr 20; 14(8):R305-7.
Score: 0.013
-
Su TT, Stumpff J. Promiscuity rules? The dispensability of cyclin E and Cdk2. Sci STKE. 2004 Mar 09; 2004(224):pe11.
Score: 0.013
-
Jaklevic BR, Su TT. Relative contribution of DNA repair, cell cycle checkpoints, and cell death to survival after DNA damage in Drosophila larvae. Curr Biol. 2004 Jan 06; 14(1):23-32.
Score: 0.013
-
O'Farrell PH, Stumpff J, Su TT. Embryonic cleavage cycles: how is a mouse like a fly? Curr Biol. 2004 Jan 06; 14(1):R35-45.
Score: 0.013
-
Jaklevic B, Purdy A, Su TT. Control of mitotic entry after DNA damage in Drosophila. Methods Mol Biol. 2004; 280:245-56.
Score: 0.013
-
Jaklevic B, Su TT. Cell turnover: flexible coupling meets the needs of development. Curr Biol. 2003 Oct 14; 13(20):R805-7.
Score: 0.013
-
De Felice B, Wilson RR, Mondola P, Matrone G, Damiano S, Garbi C, Nezi L, Su TT. Characterization of DIP1, a novel nuclear protein in Drosophila melanogaster. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2003 Jul 25; 307(2):224-8.
Score: 0.012
-
Lauren?on A, Purdy A, Sekelsky J, Hawley RS, Su TT. Phenotypic analysis of separation-of-function alleles of MEI-41, Drosophila ATM/ATR. Genetics. 2003 Jun; 164(2):589-601.
Score: 0.012
-
Tin Su T. Cell cycle: how, when and why cells get rid of cyclin A. Curr Biol. 2001 Jun 26; 11(12):R467-9.
Score: 0.011
-
Tokamov SA, Su T, Ullyot A, Fehon RG. Negative feedback couples Hippo pathway activation with Kibra degradation independent of Yorkie-mediated transcription. Elife. 2021 02 08; 10.
Score: 0.011
-
Su TT, Jaklevic B. DNA damage leads to a Cyclin A-dependent delay in metaphase-anaphase transition in the Drosophila gastrula. Curr Biol. 2001 Jan 09; 11(1):8-17.
Score: 0.010
-
Frederick BA, Gupta R, Atilano-Roque A, Su TT, Raben D. Combined EGFR1 and PARP1 Inhibition Enhances the Effect of Radiation in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Models. Radiat Res. 2020 11 10; 194(5):519-531.
Score: 0.010
-
Ni Q, Zhang F, Liu Y, Wang Z, Yu G, Liang B, Niu G, Su T, Zhu G, Lu G, Zhang L, Chen X. A bi-adjuvant nanovaccine that potentiates immunogenicity of neoantigen for combination immunotherapy of colorectal cancer. Sci Adv. 2020 03; 6(12):eaaw6071.
Score: 0.010
-
Su TT, Walker J, Stumpff J. Activating the DNA damage checkpoint in a developmental context. Curr Biol. 2000 Feb 10; 10(3):119-26.
Score: 0.010
-
Keysar SB, Gomes N, Miller B, Jackson BC, Le PN, Morton JJ, Reisinger J, Chimed TS, Gomez KE, Nieto C, Frederick B, Pronk GJ, Somerset HL, Tan AC, Wang XJ, Raben D, Su TT, Jimeno A. Inhibiting Translation Elongation with SVC112 Suppresses Cancer Stem Cells and Inhibits Growth in Head and Neck Squamous Carcinoma. Cancer Res. 2020 03 01; 80(5):1183-1198.
Score: 0.010
-
Su TT. The regulation of cell growth and proliferation during organogenesis. In Vivo. 2000 Jan-Feb; 14(1):141-8.
Score: 0.010
-
Xu J, Su T, Tokamov SA, Fehon RG. Live Imaging of Hippo Pathway Components in Drosophila Imaginal Discs. Methods Mol Biol. 2019; 1893:53-59.
Score: 0.009
-
Xing Y, Su TT, Ruohola-Baker H. Tie-mediated signal from apoptotic cells protects stem cells in Drosophila melanogaster. Nat Commun. 2015 May 11; 6:7058.
Score: 0.007
-
Yi X, Lemstra W, Vos MJ, Shang Y, Kampinga HH, Su TT, Sibon OC. A long-term flow cytometry assay to analyze the role of specific genes of Drosophila melanogaster S2 cells in surviving genotoxic stress. Cytometry A. 2008 Jul; 73(7):637-42.
Score: 0.004
-
LaRocque JR, Jaklevic B, Su TT, Sekelsky J. Drosophila ATR in double-strand break repair. Genetics. 2007 Mar; 175(3):1023-33.
Score: 0.004
-
de Vries HI, Uyetake L, Lemstra W, Brunsting JF, Su TT, Kampinga HH, Sibon OC. Grp/DChk1 is required for G2-M checkpoint activation in Drosophila S2 cells, whereas Dmnk/DChk2 is dispensable. J Cell Sci. 2005 May 01; 118(Pt 9):1833-42.
Score: 0.004
|
Connection Strength
The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.
Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.
|