 Connection
Leaf Van Boven to Humans
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Leaf Van Boven has written about Humans.
|
|
| |
Connection Strength |
|
 |
|
 |
| |
0.225 |
|
|
|
-
Grant MD, Markowitz DM, Sherman DK, Flores A, Dickert S, Eom K, Jiga-Boy GM, Kogut T, Mayorga M, Oonk D, Pedersen EJ, Pereira B, Rubaltelli E, Slovic P, V?stfj?ll D, Van Boven L. Ideological diversity of media consumption predicts COVID-19 vaccination. Sci Rep. 2024 11 22; 14(1):28948.
Score: 0.024
-
Flores A, Cole JC, Dickert S, Eom K, Jiga-Boy GM, Kogut T, Loria R, Mayorga M, Pedersen EJ, Pereira B, Rubaltelli E, Sherman DK, Slovic P, V?stfj?ll D, Van Boven L. Politicians polarize and experts depolarize public support for COVID-19 management policies across countries. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 01 18; 119(3).
Score: 0.020
-
Grant MD, Flores A, Pedersen EJ, Sherman DK, Van Boven L. When election expectations fail: Polarized perceptions of election legitimacy increase with accumulating evidence of election outcomes and with polarized media. PLoS One. 2021; 16(12):e0259473.
Score: 0.020
-
Fernbach PM, Van Boven L. False polarization: Cognitive mechanisms and potential solutions. Curr Opin Psychol. 2022 02; 43:1-6.
Score: 0.019
-
Van Boven L, Ramos J, Montal-Rosenberg R, Kogut T, Sherman DK, Slovic P. It depends: Partisan evaluation of conditional probability importance. Cognition. 2019 07; 188:51-63.
Score: 0.016
-
Van Boven L, Ehret PJ, Sherman DK. Psychological Barriers to Bipartisan Public Support for Climate Policy. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2018 07; 13(4):492-507.
Score: 0.015
-
Van Boven L, Ehret PJ, Sherman DK. Toward Surmounting the Psychological Barriers to Climate Policy-Appreciating Contexts and Acknowledging Challenges: A Reply to Weber (2018). Perspect Psychol Sci. 2018 07; 13(4):512-517.
Score: 0.015
-
Mrkva K, Travers M, Van Boven L. Simulational fluency reduces feelings of psychological distance. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2018 03; 147(3):354-376.
Score: 0.015
-
Mrkva K, Van Boven L. Attentional accounting: Voluntary spatial attention increases budget category prioritization. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2017 Sep; 146(9):1296-1306.
Score: 0.014
-
Van Boven L, Judd CM, Sherman DK. Political polarization projection: social projection of partisan attitude extremity and attitudinal processes. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2012 Jul; 103(1):84-100.
Score: 0.010
-
Van Boven L, Kane J, McGraw AP, Dale J. Feeling close: emotional intensity reduces perceived psychological distance. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2010 Jun; 98(6):872-85.
Score: 0.009
-
Van Boven L, Campbell MC, Gilovich T. Stigmatizing materialism: on stereotypes and impressions of materialistic and experiential pursuits. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2010 Apr; 36(4):551-63.
Score: 0.009
-
Van Boven L, White K, Huber M. Immediacy bias in emotion perception: current emotions seem more intense than previous emotions. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2009 Aug; 138(3):368-82.
Score: 0.008
-
Van Boven L, Ashworth L. Looking forward, looking back: anticipation is more evocative than retrospection. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2007 May; 136(2):289-300.
Score: 0.007
-
Van Boven L, Gilovich T. To do or to have? That is the question. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003 Dec; 85(6):1193-202.
Score: 0.006
-
Van Boven L, Loewenstein G. Social projection of transient drive states. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2003 Sep; 29(9):1159-68.
Score: 0.006
-
Van Boven L, White K, Kamada A, Gilovich T. Intuitions about situational correction in self and others. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003 Aug; 85(2):249-58.
Score: 0.006
-
Westfall J, Van Boven L, Chambers JR, Judd CM. Perceiving political polarization in the United States: party identity strength and attitude extremity exacerbate the perceived partisan divide. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2015 Mar; 10(2):145-58.
Score: 0.003
-
Oskarsson AT, Van Boven L, McClelland GH, Hastie R. What's next? Judging sequences of binary events. Psychol Bull. 2009 Mar; 135(2):262-85.
Score: 0.002
|
Connection Strength
The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.
Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.
|