 Connection
Connection
 
																	
																		
 Hal  Wortzel  to  Forensic Psychiatry 
																	
																		
																	
																	
																		 This is a "connection" page, showing publications  Hal  Wortzel  has written about  Forensic Psychiatry. 
 
																	
																		
																	
																	
																			
																					
	
						
				
		
			
			
			|  | 
				
					|  | Connection Strength |  |  
					|  |   |  |  
					|  | 2.465 |  |  |  | 
			
		 
	 	
	
	
		
		
			- 
				Vasile M, Hamalian G, Wortzel HS. New Guidelines for Forensic Assessment. J Psychiatr Pract. 2016 03; 22(2):124-7.	
				
				
					Score: 0.499
				 
- 
				Richards PM, Wortzel HS. Avoiding Dual Agency in Clinical and Medicolegal Practice. J Psychiatr Pract. 2015 Sep; 21(5):370-3.	
				
				
					Score: 0.482
				 
- 
				Wortzel HS, Brenner LA, Arciniegas DB. Traumatic brain injury and chronic traumatic encephalopathy: a forensic neuropsychiatric perspective. Behav Sci Law. 2013 Nov-Dec; 31(6):721-38.	
				
				
					Score: 0.420
				 
- 
				Wortzel HS. The DSM-5 and forensic psychiatry. J Psychiatr Pract. 2013 May; 19(3):238-41.	
				
				
					Score: 0.410
				 
- 
				Wortzel HS, Filley CM, Anderson CA, Oster T, Arciniegas DB. Forensic applications of cerebral single photon emission computed tomography in mild traumatic brain injury. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2008; 36(3):310-22.	
				
				
					Score: 0.283
				 
- 
				Wortzel HS. Forensic Neurology and the Role of Neurologists in Forensic Evaluations. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2024 06 04; 52(2):149-152.	
				
				
					Score: 0.221
				 
- 
				Matarazzo BB, Homaifar BY, Wortzel HS. Therapeutic risk management of the suicidal patient: safety planning. J Psychiatr Pract. 2014 May; 20(3):220-4.	
				
				
					Score: 0.110
				 
- 
				Stanley IH, Simpson S, Wortzel HS, Joiner TE. Documenting suicide risk assessments and proportionate clinical actions to improve patient safety and mitigate legal risk. Behav Sci Law. 2019 May; 37(3):304-312.	
				
				
					Score: 0.039