 Connection
John Fluke to Canada
This is a "connection" page, showing publications John Fluke has written about Canada.
|
|
| |
Connection Strength |
|
 |
|
 |
| |
0.346 |
|
|
|
-
Leeb RT, Fluke JD. Child maltreatment surveillance: enumeration, monitoring, evaluation and insight. Health Promot Chronic Dis Prev Can. 2015 Oct-Nov; 35(8-9):138-40.
Score: 0.124
-
Fluke JD, Chabot M, Fallon B, MacLaurin B, Blackstock C. Placement decisions and disparities among aboriginal groups: an application of the decision making ecology through multi-level analysis. Child Abuse Negl. 2010 Jan; 34(1):57-69.
Score: 0.083
-
Lwin K, Fluke J, Trocm? N, Fallon B, Mishna F. Ongoing child welfare services: Understanding the relationship of worker and organizational characteristics to service provision. Child Abuse Negl. 2018 06; 80:324-334.
Score: 0.037
-
Fallon B, Chabot M, Fluke J, Blackstock C, Sinha V, Allan K, MacLaurin B. Exploring alternate specifications to explain agency-level effects in placement decisions regarding Aboriginal children: Further analysis of the Canadian Incidence Study of Reported Child Abuse and Neglect Part C. Child Abuse Negl. 2015 Nov; 49:97-106.
Score: 0.030
-
Chabot M, Fallon B, Tonmyr L, MacLaurin B, Fluke J, Blackstock C. Exploring alternate specifications to explain agency-level effects in placement decisions regarding aboriginal children: further analysis of the Canadian Incidence Study of Reported Child Abuse and Neglect Part B. Child Abuse Negl. 2013 Jan; 37(1):61-76.
Score: 0.025
-
Fallon B, Chabot M, Fluke J, Blackstock C, MacLaurin B, Tonmyr L. Placement decisions and disparities among Aboriginal children: further analysis of the Canadian incidence study of reported child abuse and neglect part A: comparisons of the 1998 and 2003 surveys. Child Abuse Negl. 2013 Jan; 37(1):47-60.
Score: 0.025
-
Fallon B, Trocm? N, Fluke J, MacLaurin B, Tonmyr L, Yuan YY. Methodological challenges in measuring child maltreatment. Child Abuse Negl. 2010 Jan; 34(1):70-9.
Score: 0.021
|
Connection Strength
The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.
Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.
|