Connection
Satish Garg to Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Satish Garg has written about Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring.
|
|
Connection Strength |
|
 |
|
 |
|
12.593 |
|
|
|
-
Garg SK, Bailey TS, Castorino K, Christiansen MP, Liljenquist DR, Salazar H, Akturk HK, Gao S, Johnson ML, Beck SE. Accuracy of the 15.5-Day G7 iCGM in Adults with Diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2025 Jun; 27(6):430-438.
Score: 0.647
-
Garg SK, Hirsch IB, Repetto E, Snell-Bergeon J, Ulmer B, Perkins C, Bergenstal RM. Impact of continuous glucose monitoring on hospitalizations and glucose control in people with type 2 diabetes: real-world analysis. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2024 Nov; 26(11):5202-5210.
Score: 0.624
-
Garg SK. Emerging Landscape of Continuous Glucose Monitoring. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2021 09; 23(S3):S1-S4.
Score: 0.506
-
van der Linden J, Welsh JB, Hirsch IB, Garg SK. Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic and Its Impact on Time in Range. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2021 03; 23(S1):S1-S7.
Score: 0.488
-
Rodbard D, Garg SK. Standardizing Reporting of Glucose and Insulin Data for Patients on Multiple Daily Injections Using Connected Insulin Pens and Continuous Glucose Monitoring. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2021 03; 23(3):221-226.
Score: 0.487
-
Peters AL, Garg SK. The Silver Lining to COVID-19: Avoiding Diabetic Ketoacidosis Admissions with Telehealth. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2020 Jun; 22(6):449-453.
Score: 0.461
-
Garg SK, Hirsch IB. Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2019 02; 21(S1):S4-S12.
Score: 0.423
-
Garg SK, Akturk HK. A New Era in Continuous Glucose Monitoring: Food and Drug Administration Creates a New Category of Factory-Calibrated Nonadjunctive, Interoperable Class II Medical Devices. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2018 06; 20(6):391-394.
Score: 0.405
-
Wadwa RP, Laffel LM, Shah VN, Garg SK. Accuracy of a Factory-Calibrated, Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring System During 10 Days of Use in Youth and Adults with Diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2018 06; 20(6):395-402.
Score: 0.405
-
Shah VN, Laffel LM, Wadwa RP, Garg SK. Performance of a Factory-Calibrated Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring System Utilizing an Automated Sensor Applicator. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2018 06; 20(6):428-433.
Score: 0.404
-
Garg SK, Hirsch IB. Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2018 02; 20(S1):S3-S12.
Score: 0.395
-
Garg SK, Polsky S. Continuous glucose monitoring in pregnant women with type 1 diabetes. Lancet. 2017 11 25; 390(10110):2329-2331.
Score: 0.384
-
Garg SK, Akturk HK. The Future of Continuous Glucose Monitoring. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2017 06; 19(S3):S1-S2.
Score: 0.377
-
Garg SK, Akturk HK. Flash Glucose Monitoring: The Future Is Here. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2017 May; 19(S2):S1-S3.
Score: 0.375
-
Garg SK, Hirsch IB. Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2017 02; 19(S1):S3-S10.
Score: 0.368
-
Garg SK. The Future of Glucose Monitoring. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2016 Feb; 18 Suppl 2:S2iv-22.
Score: 0.344
-
Garg SK, Hirsch IB. Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2016 Feb; 18 Suppl 1:S3-9.
Score: 0.344
-
Garg SK. Standardization of self-monitoring of blood glucose and continuous glucose monitoring reporting. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2013 Mar; 15(3):193.
Score: 0.281
-
Garg SK, Hirsch IB. Self-monitoring of blood glucose--an overview. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2013 Feb; 15 Suppl 1:S3-12.
Score: 0.279
-
Garg SK, Voelmle M, Gottlieb PA. Time lag characterization of two continuous glucose monitoring systems. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2010 Mar; 87(3):348-53.
Score: 0.228
-
Rodbard D, Jovanovic L, Garg SK. Responses to continuous glucose monitoring in subjects with type 1 diabetes using continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion or multiple daily injections. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2009 Dec; 11(12):757-65.
Score: 0.224
-
Rodbard D, Bailey T, Jovanovic L, Zisser H, Kaplan R, Garg SK. Improved quality of glycemic control and reduced glycemic variability with use of continuous glucose monitoring. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2009 Nov; 11(11):717-23.
Score: 0.223
-
Garg SK, Smith J, Beatson C, Lopez-Baca B, Voelmle M, Gottlieb PA. Comparison of accuracy and safety of the SEVEN and the Navigator continuous glucose monitoring systems. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2009 Feb; 11(2):65-72.
Score: 0.212
-
Garg SK, Bookout TR, McFann KK, Kelly WC, Beatson C, Ellis SL, Gutin RS, Gottlieb PA. Improved glycemic control in intensively treated adult subjects with type 1 diabetes using insulin guidance software. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2008 Oct; 10(5):369-75.
Score: 0.207
-
Bailey TS, Zisser HC, Garg SK. Reduction in hemoglobin A1C with real-time continuous glucose monitoring: results from a 12-week observational study. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2007 Jun; 9(3):203-10.
Score: 0.188
-
Garg S, Zisser H, Schwartz S, Bailey T, Kaplan R, Ellis S, Jovanovic L. Improvement in glycemic excursions with a transcutaneous, real-time continuous glucose sensor: a randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Care. 2006 Jan; 29(1):44-50.
Score: 0.171
-
Garg SK, Carter JA, Mullen L, Folker AC, Parkes JL, Tideman AM. The clinical performance and ease of use of a blood glucose meter that uses a 10-test disk. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2004 Aug; 6(4):495-502.
Score: 0.155
-
Weinzimer SA, Tamborlane WV, Chase HP, Garg SK. Continuous glucose monitoring in type 1 diabetes. Curr Diab Rep. 2004 Apr; 4(2):95-100.
Score: 0.151
-
Garg SK, Hoff HK, Chase HP. The role of continuous glucose sensors in diabetes care. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 2004 Mar; 33(1):163-73, x-xi.
Score: 0.150
-
Garg SK, McVean JJ. Development and Future of Automated Insulin Delivery (AID) Systems. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2024 Mar; 26(S3):1-6.
Score: 0.150
-
Garg SK. Past, Present, and Future of Continuous Glucose Monitors. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2023 06; 25(S3):S1-S4.
Score: 0.143
-
Carroll J, Heverly J, Phillip M, Battelino T, Garg S. International Consensus of Continuous Glucose Monitor Use in Pharmacological Clinical Trials in Diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2023 04; 25(4):217-218.
Score: 0.140
-
Garg SK, Grunberger G, Weinstock R, Lawson ML, Hirsch IB, DiMeglio LA, Pop-Busui R, Philis-Tsimikas A, Kipnes M, Liljenquist DR, Brazg RL, Kudva YC, Buckingham BA, McGill JB, Carlson AL, Criego AB, Christiansen MP, Kaiserman KB, Griffin KJ, Forlenza GP, Bode BW, Slover RH, Keiter A, Ling C, Marinos B, Cordero TL, Shin J, Lee SW, Rhinehart AS, Vigersky RA. Improved Glycemia with Hybrid Closed-Loop Versus Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion Therapy: Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2023 01; 25(1):1-12.
Score: 0.138
-
Garg SK, Kipnes M, Castorino K, Bailey TS, Akturk HK, Welsh JB, Christiansen MP, Balo AK, Brown SA, Reid JL, Beck SE. Accuracy and Safety of Dexcom G7 Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Adults with Diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2022 06; 24(6):373-380.
Score: 0.131
-
Garg SK, Liljenquist D, Bode B, Christiansen MP, Bailey TS, Brazg RL, Denham DS, Chang AR, Akturk HK, Dehennis A, Tweden KS, Kaufman FR. Evaluation of Accuracy and Safety of the Next-Generation Up to 180-Day Long-Term Implantable Eversense Continuous Glucose Monitoring System: The PROMISE Study. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2022 02; 24(2):84-92.
Score: 0.127
-
Shah VN, Garg SK. Standardized Hybrid Closed-Loop System Reporting. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2021 05; 23(5):323-331.
Score: 0.120
-
Akturk HK, Garg S. Technological advances shaping diabetes care. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes. 2019 04; 26(2):84-89.
Score: 0.107
-
Akturk HK, Snell-Bergeon JK, Rewers A, Klaff LJ, Bode BW, Peters AL, Bailey TS, Garg SK. Improved Postprandial Glucose with Inhaled Technosphere Insulin Compared with Insulin Aspart in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes on Multiple Daily Injections: The STAT Study. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2018 10; 20(10):639-647.
Score: 0.103
-
Danne T, Nimri R, Battelino T, Bergenstal RM, Close KL, DeVries JH, Garg S, Heinemann L, Hirsch I, Amiel SA, Beck R, Bosi E, Buckingham B, Cobelli C, Dassau E, Doyle FJ, Heller S, Hovorka R, Jia W, Jones T, Kordonouri O, Kovatchev B, Kowalski A, Laffel L, Maahs D, Murphy HR, N?rgaard K, Parkin CG, Renard E, Saboo B, Scharf M, Tamborlane WV, Weinzimer SA, Phillip M. International Consensus on Use of Continuous Glucose Monitoring. Diabetes Care. 2017 12; 40(12):1631-1640.
Score: 0.098
-
Garg SK, Wernicke-Panten K, Rojeski M, Pierre S, Kirchhein Y, Jedynasty K. Efficacy and Safety of Biosimilar SAR342434 Insulin Lispro in Adults with Type 1 Diabetes Also Using Insulin Glargine-SORELLA 1 Study. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2017 09; 19(9):516-526.
Score: 0.096
-
Christiansen MP, Garg SK, Brazg R, Bode BW, Bailey TS, Slover RH, Sullivan A, Huang S, Shin J, Lee SW, Kaufman FR. Accuracy of a Fourth-Generation Subcutaneous Continuous Glucose Sensor. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2017 08; 19(8):446-456.
Score: 0.095
-
Schnell O, Barnard K, Bergenstal R, Bosi E, Garg S, Guerci B, Haak T, Hirsch IB, Ji L, Joshi SR, Kamp M, Laffel L, Mathieu C, Polonsky WH, Snoek F, Home P. Role of Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Clinical Trials: Recommendations on Reporting. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2017 07; 19(7):391-399.
Score: 0.094
-
Schnell O, Barnard K, Bergenstal R, Bosi E, Garg S, Guerci B, Haak T, Hirsch IB, Ji L, Joshi SR, Kamp M, Laffel L, Mathieu C, Polonsky WH, Snoek F, Home P. Clinical Utility of SMBG: Recommendations on the Use and Reporting of SMBG in Clinical Research. Diabetes Care. 2015 Sep; 38(9):1627-33.
Score: 0.083
-
Weiss R, Garg SK, Bode BW, Bailey TS, Ahmann AJ, Schultz KA, Welsh JB, Shin JJ. Hypoglycemia Reduction and Changes in Hemoglobin A1c in the ASPIRE In-Home Study. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2015 Aug; 17(8):542-7.
Score: 0.082
-
Shah VN, Shoskes A, Tawfik B, Garg SK. Closed-loop system in the management of diabetes: past, present, and future. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2014 Aug; 16(8):477-90.
Score: 0.077
-
Bailey TS, Ahmann A, Brazg R, Christiansen M, Garg S, Watkins E, Welsh JB, Lee SW. Accuracy and acceptability of the 6-day Enlite continuous subcutaneous glucose sensor. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2014 May; 16(5):277-83.
Score: 0.076
-
Bergenstal RM, Ahmann AJ, Bailey T, Beck RW, Bissen J, Buckingham B, Deeb L, Dolin RH, Garg SK, Goland R, Hirsch IB, Klonoff DC, Kruger DF, Matfin G, Mazze RS, Olson BA, Parkin C, Peters A, Powers MA, Rodriguez H, Southerland P, Strock ES, Tamborlane W, Wesley DM. Recommendations for standardizing glucose reporting and analysis to optimize clinical decision making in diabetes: the Ambulatory Glucose Profile (AGP). Diabetes Technol Ther. 2013 Mar; 15(3):198-211.
Score: 0.070
-
Garg SK, Moser EG, Bode BW, Klaff LJ, Hiatt WR, Beatson C, Snell-Bergeon JK. Effect of sitagliptin on post-prandial glucagon and GLP-1 levels in patients with type 1 diabetes: investigator-initiated, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Endocr Pract. 2013 Jan-Feb; 19(1):19-28.
Score: 0.069
-
Moser EG, Morris AA, Garg SK. Emerging diabetes therapies and technologies. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2012 Jul; 97(1):16-26.
Score: 0.065
-
Garg SK, Voelmle MK, Gottlieb P. Feasibility of 10-day use of a continuous glucose-monitoring system in adults with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2009 Mar; 32(3):436-8.
Score: 0.052
-
Ellis SL, Naik RG, Gemperline K, Garg SK. Use of continuous glucose monitoring in patients with type 1 diabetes. Curr Diabetes Rev. 2008 Aug; 4(3):207-17.
Score: 0.051
-
Garg SK, Rosenstock J, Ways K. Optimized Basal-bolus insulin regimens in type 1 diabetes: insulin glulisine versus regular human insulin in combination with Basal insulin glargine. Endocr Pract. 2005 Jan-Feb; 11(1):11-7.
Score: 0.040
-
Garg SK. Health impact from frequent and continuous glucose monitoring. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2004 Aug; 6(4):523-4.
Score: 0.039
-
Chase HP, Roberts MD, Wightman C, Klingensmith G, Garg SK, Van Wyhe M, Desai S, Harper W, Lopatin M, Bartkowiak M, Tamada J, Eastman RC. Use of the GlucoWatch biographer in children with type 1 diabetes. Pediatrics. 2003 Apr; 111(4 Pt 1):790-4.
Score: 0.035
-
Phillip M, Nimri R, Bergenstal RM, Barnard-Kelly K, Danne T, Hovorka R, Kovatchev BP, Messer LH, Parkin CG, Ambler-Osborn L, Amiel SA, Bally L, Beck RW, Biester S, Biester T, Blanchette JE, Bosi E, Boughton CK, Breton MD, Brown SA, Buckingham BA, Cai A, Carlson AL, Castle JR, Choudhary P, Close KL, Cobelli C, Criego AB, Davis E, de Beaufort C, de Bock MI, DeSalvo DJ, DeVries JH, Dovc K, Doyle FJ, Ekhlaspour L, Shvalb NF, Forlenza GP, Gallen G, Garg SK, Gershenoff DC, Gonder-Frederick LA, Haidar A, Hartnell S, Heinemann L, Heller S, Hirsch IB, Hood KK, Isaacs D, Klonoff DC, Kordonouri O, Kowalski A, Laffel L, Lawton J, Lal RA, Leelarathna L, Maahs DM, Murphy HR, N?rgaard K, O'Neal D, Oser S, Oser T, Renard E, Riddell MC, Rodbard D, Russell SJ, Schatz DA, Shah VN, Sherr JL, Simonson GD, Wadwa RP, Ward C, Weinzimer SA, Wilmot EG, Battelino T. Consensus Recommendations for the Use of Automated Insulin Delivery Technologies in Clinical Practice. Endocr Rev. 2023 03 04; 44(2):254-280.
Score: 0.035
-
Battelino T, Alexander CM, Amiel SA, Arreaza-Rubin G, Beck RW, Bergenstal RM, Buckingham BA, Carroll J, Ceriello A, Chow E, Choudhary P, Close K, Danne T, Dutta S, Gabbay R, Garg S, Heverly J, Hirsch IB, Kader T, Kenney J, Kovatchev B, Laffel L, Maahs D, Mathieu C, Mauricio D, Nimri R, Nishimura R, Scharf M, Del Prato S, Renard E, Rosenstock J, Saboo B, Ueki K, Umpierrez GE, Weinzimer SA, Phillip M. Continuous glucose monitoring and metrics for clinical trials: an international consensus statement. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2023 01; 11(1):42-57.
Score: 0.035
-
Pettus J, Boeder SC, Christiansen MP, Denham DS, Bailey TS, Akturk HK, Klaff LJ, Rosenstock J, Cheng MHM, Bode BW, Bautista ED, Xu R, Yan H, Thai D, Garg SK, Klein S. Glucagon receptor antagonist volagidemab in type 1 diabetes: a 12-week, randomized, double-blind, phase 2 trial. Nat Med. 2022 10; 28(10):2092-2099.
Score: 0.034
-
Weinstock RS, Bode BW, Garg SK, Klonoff DC, El Sanadi C, Geho WB, Muchmore DB, Penn MS. Reduced hypoglycaemia using liver-targeted insulin in individuals with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2022 09; 24(9):1762-1769.
Score: 0.033
-
Carlson AL, Sherr JL, Shulman DI, Garg SK, Pop-Busui R, Bode BW, Lilenquist DR, Brazg RL, Kaiserman KB, Kipnes MS, Thrasher JR, Reed JHC, Slover RH, Philis-Tsimikas A, Christiansen M, Grosman B, Roy A, Vella M, Jonkers RAM, Chen X, Shin J, Cordero TL, Lee SW, Rhinehart AS, Vigersky RA. Safety and Glycemic Outcomes During the MiniMed? Advanced Hybrid Closed-Loop System Pivotal Trial in Adolescents and Adults with Type 1 Diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2022 03; 24(3):178-189.
Score: 0.032
-
Phillip M, Bergenstal RM, Close KL, Danne T, Garg SK, Heinemann L, Hirsch IB, Kovatchev BP, Laffel LM, Mohan V, Parkin CG, Battelino T. The Digital/Virtual Diabetes Clinic: The Future Is Now-Recommendations from an International Panel on Diabetes Digital Technologies Introduction. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2021 02; 23(2):146-154.
Score: 0.030
-
Akturk HK, Giordano D, Champakanath A, Brackett S, Garg S, Snell-Bergeon J. Long-term real-life glycaemic outcomes with a hybrid closed-loop system compared with sensor-augmented pump therapy in patients with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2020 04; 22(4):583-589.
Score: 0.028
-
Battelino T, Danne T, Bergenstal RM, Amiel SA, Beck R, Biester T, Bosi E, Buckingham BA, Cefalu WT, Close KL, Cobelli C, Dassau E, DeVries JH, Donaghue KC, Dovc K, Doyle FJ, Garg S, Grunberger G, Heller S, Heinemann L, Hirsch IB, Hovorka R, Jia W, Kordonouri O, Kovatchev B, Kowalski A, Laffel L, Levine B, Mayorov A, Mathieu C, Murphy HR, Nimri R, N?rgaard K, Parkin CG, Renard E, Rodbard D, Saboo B, Schatz D, Stoner K, Urakami T, Weinzimer SA, Phillip M. Clinical Targets for Continuous Glucose Monitoring Data Interpretation: Recommendations From the International Consensus on Time in Range. Diabetes Care. 2019 08; 42(8):1593-1603.
Score: 0.027
-
Danne T, Cariou B, Buse JB, Garg SK, Rosenstock J, Banks P, Kushner JA, McGuire DK, Peters AL, Sawhney S, Strumph P. Improved Time in Range and Glycemic Variability With Sotagliflozin in Combination With Insulin in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes: A Pooled Analysis of 24-Week Continuous Glucose Monitoring Data From the inTandem Program. Diabetes Care. 2019 05; 42(5):919-930.
Score: 0.027
-
Cordero TL, Garg SK, Brazg R, Bailey TS, Shin J, Lee SW, Kaufman FR. The Effect of Prior Continuous Glucose Monitoring Use on Glycemic Outcomes in the Pivotal Trial of the MiniMed? 670G Hybrid Closed-Loop System. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2017 Dec; 19(12):749-752.
Score: 0.024
-
Fonseca VA, Grunberger G, Anhalt H, Bailey TS, Blevins T, Garg SK, Handelsman Y, Hirsch IB, Orzeck EA, Roberts VL, Tamborlane W. CONTINUOUS GLUCOSE MONITORING: A CONSENSUS CONFERENCE OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGISTS AND AMERICAN COLLEGE OF ENDOCRINOLOGY. Endocr Pract. 2016 Aug; 22(8):1008-21.
Score: 0.022
-
Weiss R, Garg SK, Bergenstal RM, Klonoff DC, Bode BW, Bailey TS, Thrasher J, Schwartz F, Welsh JB, Kaufman FR. Predictors of Hypoglycemia in the ASPIRE In-Home Study and Effects of Automatic Suspension of Insulin Delivery. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2015 May 18; 9(5):1016-20.
Score: 0.020
-
Bergenstal RM, Ahmann AJ, Bailey T, Beck RW, Bissen J, Buckingham B, Deeb L, Dolin RH, Garg SK, Goland R, Hirsch IB, Klonoff DC, Kruger DF, Matfin G, Mazze RS, Olson BA, Parkin C, Peters A, Powers MA, Rodriguez H, Southerland P, Strock ES, Tamborlane W, Wesley DM. Recommendations for standardizing glucose reporting and analysis to optimize clinical decision making in diabetes: the ambulatory glucose profile. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2013 Mar 01; 7(2):562-78.
Score: 0.018
-
Bolli GB, Deeb LC, Garg SK, Leahy JL, Mazze RS, Owens DR, Riddle MC, Southerland P, Strock ES. International Forum for the Advancement of Diabetes Research and Care, April 29-30, 2011, Athens, Greece. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2011 Sep; 13(9):967-79.
Score: 0.016
-
Blevins TC, Bode BW, Garg SK, Grunberger G, Hirsch IB, Jovanovic L, Nardacci E, Orzeck EA, Roberts VL, Tamborlane WV, Rothermel C. Statement by the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists Consensus Panel on continuous glucose monitoring. Endocr Pract. 2010 Sep-Oct; 16(5):730-45.
Score: 0.015
-
Ellis SL, Bookout T, Garg SK, Izuora KE. Use of continuous glucose monitoring to improve diabetes mellitus management. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 2007 Dec; 36 Suppl 2:46-68.
Score: 0.012
|
Connection Strength
The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.
Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.
|