 Connection
Mark Earnest to Interprofessional Relations
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Mark Earnest has written about Interprofessional Relations.
|
|
| |
Connection Strength |
|
 |
|
 |
| |
2.861 |
|
|
|
-
Earnest M, Madigosky WS, Yamashita T, Hanson JL. Validity evidence for using an online peer-assessment tool (CATME) to assess individual contributions to interprofessional student teamwork in a longitudinal team-based learning course. J Interprof Care. 2022 Nov-Dec; 36(6):923-931.
Score: 0.636
-
Earnest MA, Williams J, Aagaard EM. Toward an Optimal Pedagogy for Teamwork. Acad Med. 2017 10; 92(10):1378-1381.
Score: 0.467
-
Earnest MA, Pfeifle AL. Addressing the Irreducible Needs of Interprofessional Education: Creating and Sustaining an Institutional Commons for Health Professions Training. Acad Med. 2016 06; 91(6):754-6.
Score: 0.426
-
Pfeifle A, Earnest M. The creation of an institutional commons: institutional and individual benefits and risks in global health interprofessional education. J Law Med Ethics. 2014 Dec; 42 Suppl 2:45-9.
Score: 0.384
-
Earnest M, Brandt B. Aligning practice redesign and interprofessional education to advance triple aim outcomes. J Interprof Care. 2014 Nov; 28(6):497-500.
Score: 0.374
-
Lee RS, Long J, Wong S, Federico S, Battaglia C, Kennedy KI, Earnest M. Interprofessional education in leadership and advocacy. Med Teach. 2012; 34(2):179-80.
Score: 0.314
-
Earnest M. Capsule Commentary on Hsien et al., "Getting Everyone on the Same Page": Interprofessional Team Training to Develop Shared Mental Models on Interprofessional Rounds. J Gen Intern Med. 2020 03; 35(3):981.
Score: 0.138
-
Dow A, Blue A, Konrad SC, Earnest M, Reeves S. The moving target: outcomes of interprofessional education. J Interprof Care. 2013 Sep; 27(5):353-5.
Score: 0.087
-
Fink RM, Arora K, Gleason SE, Morrison KT, Robertson N, Knudson J, Sanute L, Abbott JT, Earnest M, Bailey FA. Interprofessional Master of Science in Palliative Care: On Becoming a Palliative Care Community Specialist. J Palliat Med. 2020 10; 23(10):1370-1376.
Score: 0.034
|
Connection Strength
The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.
Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.
|