Colorado PROFILES, The Colorado Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute (CCTSI)
Keywords
Last Name
Institution

Connection

Daniel Bowles to Disease-Free Survival

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Daniel Bowles has written about Disease-Free Survival.

 
Connection Strength
 
 
 
0.713
 
  1. Bowles DW, Kochenderfer M, Cohn A, Sideris L, Nguyen N, Cline-Burkhardt V, Schnadig I, Choi M, Nabell L, Chaudhry A, Ruxer R, Ucar A, Hausman D, Walker L, Spira A, Jimeno A. A Randomized, Phase II Trial of Cetuximab With or Without PX-866, an Irreversible Oral Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase Inhibitor, in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Carcinoma. Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2016 12; 15(4):337-344.e2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.122
  2. Bowles DW, Keysar SB, Eagles JR, Wang G, Glogowska MJ, McDermott JD, Le PN, Gao D, Ray CE, Rochon PJ, Roop DR, Tan AC, Serracino HS, Jimeno A. A pilot study of cetuximab and the hedgehog inhibitor IPI-926 in recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Oral Oncol. 2016 Feb; 53:74-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.119
  3. Levy B, Spira A, Becker D, Evans T, Schnadig I, Camidge DR, Bauman JE, Hausman D, Walker L, Nemunaitis J, Rudin CM, Halmos B, Bowles DW. A randomized, phase 2 trial of Docetaxel with or without PX-866, an irreversible oral phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase inhibitor, in patients with relapsed or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2014 Jul; 9(7):1031-1035.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.108
  4. Bowles DW, Senzer N, Hausman D, Peterson S, Vo A, Walker L, Cohen RB, Jimeno A. A multicenter phase 1 study of PX-866 and cetuximab in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma or recurrent/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Invest New Drugs. 2014 Dec; 32(6):1197-203.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.107
  5. Bowles DW, Ma WW, Senzer N, Brahmer JR, Adjei AA, Davies M, Lazar AJ, Vo A, Peterson S, Walker L, Hausman D, Rudin CM, Jimeno A. A multicenter phase 1 study of PX-866 in combination with docetaxel in patients with advanced solid tumours. Br J Cancer. 2013 Sep 03; 109(5):1085-92.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.101
  6. Necchi A, Pond GR, Pal SK, Agarwal N, Bowles DW, Plimack ER, Yu EY, Ladoire S, Baniel J, Crabb S, Niegisch G, Srinivas S, Berthold DR, Rosenberg JE, Powles T, Bamias A, Harshman LC, Bellmunt J, Galsky MD. Bone Metastases as the Only Metastatic Site in Patients With Urothelial Carcinoma: Focus on a Special Patient Population. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2018 04; 16(2):e483-e490.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
  7. Necchi A, Pond GR, Smaldone MC, Pal SK, Chan K, Wong YN, Viterbo R, Sonpavde G, Harshman LC, Crabb S, Alva A, Chowdhury S, De Giorgi U, Srinivas S, Agarwal N, Bamias A, Baniel J, Golshayan AR, Ladoire S, Sternberg CN, Cerbone L, Yu EY, Bellmunt J, Vaishampayan U, Niegisch G, Hussain S, Bowles DW, Morales-Barrera R, Milowsky MI, Theodore C, Berthold DR, Sridhar SS, Powles T, Rosenberg JE, Galsky MD. Robot-assisted Versus Open Radical Cystectomy in Patients Receiving Perioperative Chemotherapy for Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer: The Oncologist's Perspective from a Multicentre Study. Eur Urol Focus. 2018 12; 4(6):937-945.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  8. Stokes WA, Amini A, Jones BL, McDermott JD, Raben D, Ghosh D, Goddard JA, Bowles DW, Karam SD. Survival impact of induction chemotherapy in advanced head and neck cancer: A National Cancer Database analysis. Head Neck. 2017 06; 39(6):1113-1121.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  9. Stokes WA, Jones BL, Bhatia S, Oweida AJ, Bowles DW, Raben D, Goddard JA, McDermott JD, Karam SD. A comparison of overall survival for patients with T4 larynx cancer treated with surgical versus organ-preservation approaches: A National Cancer Data Base analysis. Cancer. 2017 Feb 15; 123(4):600-608.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  10. Berge EM, Bowles DW, Flaig TW, Lam ET, Jimeno A. Tivozanib: practical implications for renal cell carcinoma and other solid tumors. Drugs Today (Barc). 2013 May; 49(5):303-15.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.

Copyright © 2024 The Regents of the University of Colorado, a body corporate. All rights reserved. (Harvard PROFILES RNS software version: 2.11.1)