 Connection
John Rumsfeld to Models, Statistical
This is a "connection" page, showing publications John Rumsfeld has written about Models, Statistical.
|
|
| |
Connection Strength |
|
 |
|
 |
| |
1.072 |
|
|
|
-
Allen LA, Rumsfeld JS. Can we predict who will be alive and well after transcatheter aortic valve replacement? Is that useful to individual patients? Circulation. 2014 Jun 24; 129(25):2636-7.
Score: 0.354
-
Inohara T, Kohsaka S, Miyata H, Ueda I, Maekawa Y, Fukuda K, Cohen DJ, Kennedy KF, Rumsfeld JS, Spertus JA. Performance and Validation of the U.S. NCDR Acute Kidney Injury Prediction Model in Japan. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Apr 12; 67(14):1715-22.
Score: 0.101
-
Edwards FH, Cohen DJ, O'Brien SM, Peterson ED, Mack MJ, Shahian DM, Grover FL, Tuzcu EM, Thourani VH, Carroll J, Brennan JM, Brindis RG, Rumsfeld J, Holmes DR. Development and Validation of a Risk Prediction Model for In-Hospital Mortality After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement. JAMA Cardiol. 2016 04 01; 1(1):46-52.
Score: 0.101
-
Rumsfeld JS, Joynt KE, Maddox TM. Big data analytics to improve cardiovascular care: promise and challenges. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2016 06; 13(6):350-9.
Score: 0.100
-
Arnold SV, Masoudi FA, Rumsfeld JS, Li Y, Jones PG, Spertus JA. Derivation and validation of a risk standardization model for benchmarking hospital performance for health-related quality of life outcomes after acute myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2014 Jan 21; 129(3):313-20.
Score: 0.085
-
Chin CT, Chen AY, Wang TY, Alexander KP, Mathews R, Rumsfeld JS, Cannon CP, Fonarow GC, Peterson ED, Roe MT. Risk adjustment for in-hospital mortality of contemporary patients with acute myocardial infarction: the acute coronary treatment and intervention outcomes network (ACTION) registry-get with the guidelines (GWTG) acute myocardial infarction mortality model and risk score. Am Heart J. 2011 Jan; 161(1):113-122.e2.
Score: 0.070
-
Klein LW, Kolm P, Xu X, Krone RJ, Anderson HV, Rumsfeld JS, Brindis RG, Weintraub WS. A longitudinal assessment of coronary interventional program quality: a report from the American College of Cardiology-National Cardiovascular Data Registry. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Feb; 2(2):136-43.
Score: 0.061
-
Singh M, Peterson ED, Milford-Beland S, Rumsfeld JS, Spertus JA. Validation of the Mayo clinic risk score for in-hospital mortality after percutaneous coronary interventions using the national cardiovascular data registry. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2008 Aug; 1(1):36-44.
Score: 0.059
-
Singh M, Gersh BJ, Li S, Rumsfeld JS, Spertus JA, O'Brien SM, Suri RM, Peterson ED. Mayo Clinic Risk Score for percutaneous coronary intervention predicts in-hospital mortality in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Circulation. 2008 Jan 22; 117(3):356-62.
Score: 0.057
-
Huang C, Li SX, Mahajan S, Testani JM, Wilson FP, Mena CI, Masoudi FA, Rumsfeld JS, Spertus JA, Mortazavi BJ, Krumholz HM. Development and Validation of a Model for Predicting the Risk of Acute Kidney Injury Associated With Contrast Volume Levels During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. JAMA Netw Open. 2019 11 01; 2(11):e1916021.
Score: 0.032
-
Wimmer NJ, Spertus JA, Kennedy KF, Anderson HV, Curtis JP, Weintraub WS, Singh M, Rumsfeld JS, Masoudi FA, Yeh RW. Clinical prediction model suitable for assessing hospital quality for patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy. J Am Heart Assoc. 2014 Jun 17; 3(3):e000728.
Score: 0.022
-
Amin AP, Spertus JA, Cohen DJ, Chhatriwalla A, Kennedy KF, Vilain K, Salisbury AC, Venkitachalam L, Lai SM, Mauri L, Normand SL, Rumsfeld JS, Messenger JC, Yeh RW. Use of drug-eluting stents as a function of predicted benefit: clinical and economic implications of current practice. Arch Intern Med. 2012 Aug 13; 172(15):1145-52.
Score: 0.020
-
Gardner SC, Grunwald GK, Rumsfeld JS, Cleveland JC, Schooley LM, Gao D, Grover FL, McDonald GO, Shroyer AL. Comparison of short-term mortality risk factors for valve replacement versus coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004 Feb; 77(2):549-56.
Score: 0.011
|
Connection Strength
The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.
Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.
|