 Connection
Donald Nease Jr to Female
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Donald Nease Jr has written about Female.
|
|
| |
Connection Strength |
|
 |
|
 |
| |
0.307 |
|
|
|
-
Kondrad EC, Reed AJ, Simpson MJ, Nease DE. Lack of Communication about Medical Marijuana Use between Doctors and Their Patients. J Am Board Fam Med. 2018 Sep-Oct; 31(5):805-808.
Score: 0.025
-
Kwan BM, Jortberg B, Warman MK, Kane I, Wearner R, Koren R, Carrigan T, Martinez V, Nease DE. Stakeholder engagement in diabetes self-management: patient preference for peer support and other insights. Fam Pract. 2017 06 01; 34(3):358-363.
Score: 0.023
-
Westfall JM, Zittleman L, Felzien M, Norman N, Tamez M, Backlund-Jarquin P, Nease D. Reinventing The Wheel Of Medical Evidence: How The Boot Camp Translation Process Is Making Gains. Health Aff (Millwood). 2016 Apr; 35(4):613-8.
Score: 0.021
-
Aikens JE, Klinkman MS, Sen A, Nease DE. Improving the assessment of depression remission with the Remission Evaluation and Mood Inventory Tool. Int J Psychiatry Med. 2015; 50(4):383-97.
Score: 0.021
-
Nease DE. Addressing the health care needs of patients with serious mental illness - it takes a system. J Prim Health Care. 2014 Mar 01; 6(1):6.
Score: 0.019
-
Ross SE, Radcliff TA, Leblanc WG, Dickinson LM, Libby AM, Nease DE. Effects of health information exchange adoption on ambulatory testing rates. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013 Nov-Dec; 20(6):1137-42.
Score: 0.018
-
Ruffin MT, Nease DE. Using patient monetary incentives and electronically derived patient lists to recruit patients to a clinical trial. J Am Board Fam Med. 2011 Sep-Oct; 24(5):569-75.
Score: 0.016
-
Nease DE, Aikens JE, Klinkman MS, Kroenke K, Sen A. Toward a more comprehensive assessment of depression remission: the Remission Evaluation and Mood Inventory Tool (REMIT). Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2011 May-Jun; 33(3):279-86.
Score: 0.015
-
Nease DE, Ruffin MT, Klinkman MS, Jimbo M, Braun TM, Underwood JM. Impact of a generalizable reminder system on colorectal cancer screening in diverse primary care practices: a report from the prompting and reminding at encounters for prevention project. Med Care. 2008 Sep; 46(9 Suppl 1):S68-73.
Score: 0.013
-
Nease DE, Klinkman MS, Aikens JE. Severity and criteria based prompting for treatment of depressed patients. Int J Psychiatry Med. 2005; 35(2):149-59.
Score: 0.010
-
Nease DE, Klinkman MS, Volk RJ. Improved detection of depression in primary care through severity evaluation. J Fam Pract. 2002 Dec; 51(12):1065-70.
Score: 0.009
-
Dickinson WP, Nease DE, Rhyne RL, Knierim KE, Fernald DH, de la Cerda DR, Dickinson LM. Practice Transformation Support and Patient Engagement to Improve Cardiovascular Care: From EvidenceNOW Southwest (ENSW). J Am Board Fam Med. 2020 Sep-Oct; 33(5):675-686.
Score: 0.007
-
Loeb DF, Monson SP, Lockhart S, Depue C, Ludman E, Nease DE, Binswanger IA, Kline DM, de Gruy FV, Good DG, Bayliss EA. Mixed method evaluation of Relational Team Development (RELATED) to improve team-based care for complex patients with mental illness in primary care. BMC Psychiatry. 2019 10 15; 19(1):299.
Score: 0.007
-
Nease DE, Volk RJ, Cass AR. Does the severity of mood and anxiety symptoms predict health care utilization? J Fam Pract. 1999 Oct; 48(10):769-77.
Score: 0.007
-
Knierim KE, Hall TL, Dickinson LM, Nease DE, de la Cerda DR, Fernald D, Bleecker MJ, Rhyne RL, Dickinson WP. Primary Care Practices' Ability to Report Electronic Clinical Quality Measures in the EvidenceNOW Southwest Initiative to Improve Heart Health. JAMA Netw Open. 2019 08 02; 2(8):e198569.
Score: 0.007
-
Mullen RA, Tong S, Sabo RT, Liaw WR, Marshall J, Nease DE, Krist AH, Frey JJ. Loneliness in Primary Care Patients: A Prevalence Study. Ann Fam Med. 2019 03; 17(2):108-115.
Score: 0.007
-
Holtrop JS, Fisher M, Martinez DE, Simpson M, Awadallah NS, Nease DE, Zittleman L, Westfall JM. What Works for Managing Chronic Pain: An Appreciative Inquiry Qualitative Analysis. J Prim Care Community Health. 2019 Jan-Dec; 10:2150132719885286.
Score: 0.006
-
Cass AR, Volk RJ, Nease DE. Health-related quality of life in primary care patients with recognized and unrecognized mood and anxiety disorders. Int J Psychiatry Med. 1999; 29(3):293-309.
Score: 0.006
-
Loeb DF, Leister E, Ludman E, Binswanger IA, Crane L, Dickinson M, Kline DM, deGruy FV, Nease D, Bayliss EA. Factors associated with physician self-efficacy in mental illness management and team-based care. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2018 Jan - Feb; 50:111-118.
Score: 0.006
-
Loeb DF, Crane LA, Leister E, Bayliss EA, Ludman E, Binswanger IA, Kline DM, Smith M, deGruy FV, Nease DE, Dickinson LM. Development and initial validation of primary care provider mental illness management and team-based care self-efficacy scales. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2017 Mar - Apr; 45:44-50.
Score: 0.006
-
Sipe TA, Finnie RK, Knopf JA, Qu S, Reynolds JA, Thota AB, Hahn RA, Goetzel RZ, Hennessy KD, McKnight-Eily LR, Chapman DP, Anderson CW, Azrin S, Abraido-Lanza AF, Gelenberg AJ, Vernon-Smiley ME, Nease DE. Effects of mental health benefits legislation: a community guide systematic review. Am J Prev Med. 2015 Jun; 48(6):755-66.
Score: 0.005
-
Green LA, Nease D, Klinkman MS. Clinical reminders designed and implemented using cognitive and organizational science principles decrease reminder fatigue. J Am Board Fam Med. 2015 May-Jun; 28(3):351-9.
Score: 0.005
-
Murphy DJ, Williamson PS, Nease DE. Supportive family members of diabetic adults. Fam Pract Res J. 1994 Dec; 14(4):323-31.
Score: 0.005
-
Jimbo M, Shultz CG, Nease DE, Fetters MD, Power D, Ruffin MT. Perceived barriers and facilitators of using a Web-based interactive decision aid for colorectal cancer screening in community practice settings: findings from focus groups with primary care clinicians and medical office staff. J Med Internet Res. 2013 Dec 18; 15(12):e286.
Score: 0.005
-
Nease DE. Mental health issues in rural settings. Kans Med. 1993 Sep; 94(9):246-8.
Score: 0.004
-
Jimbo M, Rana GK, Hawley S, Holmes-Rovner M, Kelly-Blake K, Nease DE, Ruffin MT. What is lacking in current decision aids on cancer screening? CA Cancer J Clin. 2013 May; 63(3):193-214.
Score: 0.004
-
Kales HC, Nease DE, Sirey JA, Zivin K, Kim HM, Kavanagh J, Lynn S, Chiang C, Neighbors HW, Valenstein M, Blow FC. Racial differences in adherence to antidepressant treatment in later life. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2013 Oct; 21(10):999-1009.
Score: 0.004
-
Wang C, Sen A, Ruffin MT, Nease DE, Gramling R, Acheson LS, O'Neill SM, Rubinstein WS. Family history assessment: impact on disease risk perceptions. Am J Prev Med. 2012 Oct; 43(4):392-8.
Score: 0.004
-
Ruffin MT, Nease DE, Sen A, Pace WD, Wang C, Acheson LS, Rubinstein WS, O'Neill S, Gramling R. Effect of preventive messages tailored to family history on health behaviors: the Family Healthware Impact Trial. Ann Fam Med. 2011 Jan-Feb; 9(1):3-11.
Score: 0.004
-
Acheson LS, Wang C, Zyzanski SJ, Lynn A, Ruffin MT, Gramling R, Rubinstein WS, O'Neill SM, Nease DE. Family history and perceptions about risk and prevention for chronic diseases in primary care: a report from the family healthware impact trial. Genet Med. 2010 Apr; 12(4):212-8.
Score: 0.004
-
Wang C, O'Neill SM, Rothrock N, Gramling R, Sen A, Acheson LS, Rubinstein WS, Nease DE, Ruffin MT. Comparison of risk perceptions and beliefs across common chronic diseases. Prev Med. 2009 Feb; 48(2):197-202.
Score: 0.003
-
Aikens JE, Kroenke K, Nease DE, Klinkman MS, Sen A. Trajectories of improvement for six depression-related outcomes. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2008 Jan-Feb; 30(1):26-31.
Score: 0.003
-
Aikens JE, Nease DE, Klinkman MS. Explaining patients' beliefs about the necessity and harmfulness of antidepressants. Ann Fam Med. 2008 Jan-Feb; 6(1):23-9.
Score: 0.003
-
Zazove P, Meador HE, Aikens JE, Nease DE, Gorenflo DW. Assessment of depressive symptoms in deaf persons. J Am Board Fam Med. 2006 Mar-Apr; 19(2):141-7.
Score: 0.003
-
Aikens JE, Nease DE, Nau DP, Klinkman MS, Schwenk TL. Adherence to maintenance-phase antidepressant medication as a function of patient beliefs about medication. Ann Fam Med. 2005 Jan-Feb; 3(1):23-30.
Score: 0.002
|
Connection Strength
The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.
Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.
|